First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy for Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer: LIGHT-NING study.

OBJECTIVE: As first-line treatment for stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, with or without chemotherapy, had demonstrated survival benefits over chemotherapy; however, data on Japanese patients are limited. METHODS: LIGHT-NING was a multicenter, observational study and retrospectively collected data. In this interim analysis, we analyzed patients who received combination immunotherapy between 27 November 2020 and 31 August 2021 for the treatment status, safety objectives (treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events incidences), and effectiveness objectives (objective response rate and progression-free survival) to determine the characteristics and early safety information. RESULTS: We analyzed 353 patients, with a median follow-up of 7.1 (interquartile range, 5.0-9.7) months. Overall, 60.1 and 39.9% received nivolumab plus ipilimumab with and without chemotherapy, respectively. In these cohorts, the median age was 67 and 72 years; 10.8 and 35.5% were aged ≥75 years; 80.2 and 79.4% were male; 5.2 and 13.5% had a performance score ≥ 2; 32.1 and 27.0% developed grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events; treatment-related deaths were observed in 6 (2.8%) and 5 (3.5%) patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse event incidence was the highest within the first month of treatment in both cohorts, although the immune-related adverse event risk persisted throughout. No new safety signals were observed at this interim analysis. The median progression-free survival was 6.0 (95% confidence interval, 5.2-7.6) and 5.8 (4.3-7.0) months in nivolumab plus ipilimumab with and without chemotherapy cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LIGHT-NING offers valuable insights into combination immunotherapy for untreated patients with stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in Japanese real-world settings.

Niacin restriction with NAMPT-inhibition is synthetic lethal to neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) plays a major role in NAD biosynthesis in many cancers and is an attractive potential cancer target. However, factors dictating therapeutic efficacy of NAMPT inhibitors (NAMPTi) are unclear. We report that neuroendocrine phenotypes predict lung and prostate carcinoma vulnerability to NAMPTi, and that NAMPTi therapy against those cancers is enhanced by dietary modification. Neuroendocrine differentiation of tumor cells is associated with down-regulation of genes relevant to quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase-dependent de novo NAD synthesis, promoting NAMPTi susceptibility in vitro. We also report that circulating nicotinic acid riboside (NAR), a non-canonical niacin absent in culture media, antagonizes NAMPTi efficacy as it fuels NAMPT-independent but nicotinamide riboside kinase 1-dependent NAD synthesis in tumors. In mouse transplantation models, depleting blood NAR by nutritional or genetic manipulations is synthetic lethal to tumors when combined with NAMPTi. Our findings provide a rationale for simultaneous targeting of NAR metabolism and NAMPT therapeutically in neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Multi-gene Liquid Biopsy to Detect Resistance to First-line Osimertinib in Patients With EGFR-mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Osimertinib is currently used as a first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer, and the emergence of drug resistance poses a substantial challenge. Liquid biopsy with a multi-gene panel can examine both the molecular mechanisms and possibility of early resistance diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used a molecular barcode library construction kit (Archer® LiquidPlex™) that allowed the analysis of multiple cancer-related genes using cell-free DNA from the plasma samples of patients. We collected plasma from 17 consecutive patients with lung adenocarcinoma at our hospital at various time points and cell-free DNA was extracted and subjected to LiquidPlex analysis. RESULTS: Plasma DNA concentration was not associated with the presence or absence of resistance to osimertinib. The pathological mutations detected using next-generation sequencing in the resistant specimens were in MAP2K1, PIK3CA, TP53, BRAF, and EGFR. Among the recurrent cases, EGFR mutations identified at the initial diagnosis were detected within 6 months before relapse confirmation in four cases (average 88 days). Many of the recurrent cases without detection of known EGFR mutations in the liquid biopsy showed a longer interval between the detection of relapse and the last blood draw for the liquid biopsy (average 255 days). CONCLUSION: Frequent liquid biopsies are useful for identifying known EGFR mutations as markers for early detection of relapse. Several cancer driver mutations were observed, suggesting a variety of mechanisms of resistance in first-line osimertinib-treated lung adenocarcinoma.

Monitoring of Plasma EGFR Mutations during Osimertinib Treatment for NSCLC Patients with Acquired T790M Mutation.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib was first approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients who have developed the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation after treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We routinely evaluated the plasma of NSCLC patients with the T790M mutation to more rapidly detect an increase in disease activity and resistance to treatment. METHODS: Eligible patients received osimertinib after resistance to the first- or second-generation of EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC harboring T790M mutation detectable in tumor tissue or plasma. Plasma samples were collected every 8 weeks during osimertinib treatment. The plasma analysis was performed using an improved PNA-LNA PCR clamp method. We tested samples for a resistance mechanism, including EGFR-activating, T790M, and C797S mutations, and assessed the association between the mutations and osimertinib treatment. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, 58 were eligible for this analysis. In plasma collected before osimertinib treatment, activating mutations were detected in 47 of 58 patients (81.0%) and T790M was detected in 44 patients (75.9%). Activating mutations were cleared in 60.9% (28/46) and T790M was cleared in 93.0% (40/43). Of these, 71.4% (20/28) of activating mutations and 87.5% (35/40) of T790M mutation were cleared within 8 weeks of treatment. The total response rate (RR) was 53.4% (31/58). The median duration of treatment was 259 days, with a trend toward longer treatment duration in patients who experienced the clearance of activating mutations with osimertinib. At the time of disease progression during osimertinib treatment, C797S was detected in 3 of 37 patients (8.1%). CONCLUSION: Plasma EGFR mutation analysis was effective in predicting the effect of osimertinib treatment.

A Prospective Cohort Study Assessing the Relationship between Plasma Levels of Osimertinib and Treatment Efficacy and Safety.

Osimertinib is a standard treatment for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). We evaluated the relationship between plasma osimertinib concentrations and treatment outcome in patients with NSCLC for this cohort study. The plasma levels of osimertinib and its metabolite AZ5104 were measured a week after the start of treatment (P1). The primary endpoint was to evaluate the correlation between plasma concentration and adverse events (AEs). The correlation with treatment efficacy was one of the secondary endpoints. In patients with CNS metastases, the concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid was also measured. Forty-one patients were enrolled. The frequency of AEs was highest for rash, followed by anorexia and thrombocytopenia. Thirty-eight cases provided measurements for P1. The median plasma concentration of osimertinib was 227 ng/mL, and that of AZ5104 was 16.5 ng/mL. The mean CNS penetration rate of two cases was 3.8%. The P1 in the group with anorexia was significantly higher than that in the group without anorexia (385.0 ng/mL vs. 231.5 ng/mL, p = 0.009). Divided into quartiles by P1 trough level, Q2 + Q3 (164-338 ng/mL) had longer PFS, while Q1 and Q4 had shorter PFS. An appropriate plasma level of osimertinib may avoid some adverse events and induce long PFS. Further large-scale trials are warranted.

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: 5-year outcomes in Japanese patients from CheckMate 227 Part 1.

BACKGROUND: In CheckMate 227 Part 1 (NCT02477826), first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated long-term durable overall survival (OS) benefit versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. We report results in Japanese patients with ≥ 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Adults with stage IV/recurrent NSCLC without EGFR/ALK aberrations were randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab alone, or chemotherapy (patients with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1%), or nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy (patients with tumor PD-L1 < 1%). Five-year efficacy and safety were assessed in Japanese patients. RESULTS: At 62.1 months' minimum follow-up, 143 Japanese patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% or < 1% were randomized to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 66) or chemotherapy (n = 77). Five-year OS rates were 46% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 34% with chemotherapy (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 36% versus 19% (PD-L1 < 1%). Median duration of response was 59.1 versus 7.1 months (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 17.3 versus 3.0 months (PD-L1 < 1%). Among 5-year survivors treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (PD-L1 ≥ 1% and < 1%; n = 27), 59% (95% CI, 39%-75%) were off treatment for ≥ 3 years without receiving subsequent therapy. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: At 5-year follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to show long-term durable clinical benefit versus chemotherapy, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. Consistent with findings for the global population, these data support the use of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with metastatic NSCLC.

Health Care Resource Use Among Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Japan, 2017-2019.

Background: First-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was introduced in Japan in February 2017. Limited information is available since that time regarding health care resource use for NSCLC in Japan, where the hospitalization burden is high. Objective: We evaluated health care resource use from first- through third-line systemic anticancer therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC included in a multicenter, retrospective chart review study. Methods: Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older with unresectable locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC with no known actionable genomic alteration who initiated first-line systemic anticancer therapy from July 1, 2017, to December 20, 2018, at 23 Japanese hospitals. We calculated the percentage of patients with a record of each resource used, the total number of each resource, and the resource use per 100 patient-weeks of follow-up from initiation of first-, second-, and third-line therapy, overall and by the 3 most common regimen categories, namely, ICI monotherapy, platinum-doublet chemotherapy (without concomitant ICI), and nonplatinum cytotoxic regimens (nonplatinum). Study follow-up ended September 30, 2019. Results: Among 1208 patients (median age = 70 years; 975 [81%] men), 463 patients (38%) received ICI monotherapy, 647 (54%) received platinum-doublet chemotherapy, and 98 (8%) received nonplatinum regimens as first-line therapy. During the study, 621 (51%) patients initiated second-line, and 281 (23%) initiated third-line therapy. The majority of patients experienced ≥1 hospitalization (76%-94%) and ≥1 outpatient visit (85%-90%) during each therapy line. The number of hospitalizations increased from 6.5 per 100 patient-weeks in first-line to 8.0 per 100 patient-weeks in third-line. During first-line therapy, the number of hospitalizations per 100 patient-weeks were 4.8, 8.4, and 6.5 for patients receiving ICI monotherapy, platinum-doublet chemotherapy, and nonplatinum regimens, respectively, and the percentages of hospitalizations categorized as attributable to NSCLC treatment administration (no surgery, procedure, treatment of metastasis, or palliative lung radiation) were 64%, 77%, and 73%, respectively. The number of outpatient visits increased from 43.0 per 100 patient-weeks in first-line to 51.4 per 100 patient-weeks in third-line therapy. During first-line therapy, outpatient visits per 100 patient-weeks were 41.0, 46.7, and 33.0 for patients receiving ICI monotherapy, platinum-doublet chemotherapy, and nonplatinum regimens, respectively, and the percentages of outpatient visits for infusion therapy were 48%, 34%, and 36%, respectively. Conclusions: The results of this study, although solely descriptive, showed differing patterns of health care resource use during first-line therapy among the 3 common systemic anticancer therapy regimens for advanced NSCLC in Japan and suggest that further research is needed to investigate these apparent differences by treatment regimen.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in KEYNOTE-407.

The global phase III KEYNOTE-407 (NCT02775435) trial showed that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy prolonged overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present outcomes of patients from Japan enrolled in KEYNOTE-407. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (Q3W) or nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 (weekly) plus carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg/mL/min Q3W for four cycles, followed by pembrolizumab or placebo Q3W for a total of 35 cycles. Primary end-points were OS and PFS per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Fifty patients were randomized at Japanese sites (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 22; placebo plus chemotherapy, n = 28). Median follow-up time at data cut-off (May 9, 2019) was 15.1 (range, 0.5-24.0) months. Median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 17.3 (12.5-not reached) versus 11.0 (8.6-19.5) months in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56; 95% CI, 0.27-1.15). Median PFS (95% CI) was 8.3 (6.1-13.0) versus 7.2 (3.9-8.8) months (HR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35-1.23). Grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 86% and 75% of patients, respectively. There were three fatal AEs, two of which were treatment-related (one from each treatment group, pneumonitis and pulmonary hemorrhage). Efficacy and safety outcomes were consistent with the global study and support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC.

Detection of multiple druggable mutations of lung cancer from cytology specimens by MINtS: An advanced medicine A trial.

Most multigene mutation tests require tissue specimens. However, cytological specimens are easily obtained in the clinical practice and provide high-quality DNA and RNA. We aimed to establish a test that utilizes cytological specimens and performed a multi-institutional study to investigate the performance of MINtS, a test based on next-generation sequencing. A standard procedure for specimen isolation was defined. The specimens were considered suitable for the test if >100 ng DNA and >50 ng RNA could be extracted from them. In total, 500 specimens from 19 institutions were investigated. MINtS detected druggable mutations in 63% (136 of 222) of adenocarcinomas. Discordant results between MINtS and the companion diagnostics were observed in 14 of 310 specimens for the EGFR gene, and 6 of 339 specimens for the ALK fusion genes. Confirmation by other companion diagnostics for the EGFR mutations or the clinical response to an ALK inhibitor all supported the results obtained by MINtS. MINtS along with the isolation procedure presented in the current study will be a platform to establish multigene mutation tests that utilize cytological specimens. UMIN000040415.

Phase II study of carboplatin-paclitaxel alone or with bevacizumab in advanced sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung: HOT1201/NEJ024.

OBJECTIVES: Only a few prospective studies have been conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of systemic chemotherapy for patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas (PSCs). There is, thus, a crucial need to develop novel treatment strategies for this rare tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically confirmed PSCs were assigned to receive either carboplatin/paclitaxel alone (CP) or with bevacizumab (CPB) followed by bevacizumab maintenance. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: This study was closed before accumulating the expected number of cases due to slow patient accrual. Eventually, 16 patients were enrolled. The ORR was 25.0% and disease control rate was 56.3%. CPB was administered in all four patients with an objective response [partial response (PR)]; among the four PR cases, two patients had pleomorphic carcinoma, and two had carcinosarcoma. Median PFS and median survival time (MST) in all the enrolled patients were 2.6 months and 8.8 months, respectively. Median PFS was 1.2 months in the CP group and 4.2 months in the CPB group. In addition, MST was 7.9 months in the CP group and 11.2 months in the CPB group. Hematological and non-hematological adverse events were common and reversible, although ileus (grade 4) and nasal bleeding (grade 3) occurred in one case each in the CPB group. CONCLUSIONS: CPB might be effective as first-line treatment for PSCs. Further study is warranted to clarify the role of cytotoxic chemotherapy for this rare and aggressive tumor. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000008707).

Bevacizumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in Japanese patients with advanced, metastatic, EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ026): overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab is a promising candidate for combination treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (eg, erlotinib), which could improve outcomes for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We have previously shown in NEJ026, a phase 3 trial, that the combination of bevacizumab plus erlotinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with erlotinib alone in these patients. In further analyses, we aimed to examine the effects of bevacizumab-erlotinib on overall survival, time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death, and quality of life. METHODS: This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial (NEJ026) was done in 69 hospitals and medical, community-based centres across Japan. Eligible patients had stage IIIB, stage IV, or postoperative recurrent, EGFR-mutant (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 Leu858Arg point mutation) NSCLC, had not previously received systemic chemotherapy, and were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation sequence and minimisation to receive either 150 mg oral erlotinib once daily plus 15 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab once every 21 days, or 150 mg oral erlotinib once daily, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified according to sex, smoking status, EGFR mutation subtype, and clinical disease stage. All participants, investigators, and study personnel (including those assessing outcomes) were unmasked to treatment allocation. We report the secondary outcomes of overall survival and quality of life (the period from enrolment to confirmation of a minimally important difference on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-C30), and the exploratory outcome of time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death. Overall survival and the exploratory outcome were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study drug and had response evaluations. Quality of life was analysed in patients in the modified intention-to-treat population who had completed the quality of life questionnaires. The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000017069, and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031180056, and is currently closed. FINDINGS: Between June 3, 2015, and Aug 31, 2016, 228 patients were enrolled. 112 patients who received bevacizumab-erlotinib and 112 who received erlotinib only were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. At data cutoff (Nov 30, 2019) and a median follow-up of 39·2 months (IQR 23·9-43·5), the median overall survival was 50·7 months (95% CI 37·3-not estimable [NE]) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group and 46·2 months (38·2-NE) in the erlotinib-only group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·007, 95% CI 0·681-1·490; p=0·97). In analysis of the exploratory outcome, after a median follow-up of 23·9 months (IQR 14·2-39·1), the median time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death was 28·6 months (95% CI 22·1-35·9) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group and 24·3 months (20·4-29·1) in the erlotinib-only group (HR 0·773, 95% CI 0·562-1·065). The median time between enrolment and confirmation of a minimally important difference on the EORTC QLQ-C30 was 6·0 months (95% CI 5·2-11·3) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group and 8·3 months (5·7-13·9) in the erlotinib-only group (p=0·47). INTERPRETATION: The addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib did not prolong survival in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC, but both treatment groups had relatively long survival durations. Why the addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib did not affect overall survival is unclear, but it is possible that the beneficial effects of combination therapy were not seen because overall survival was influenced by treatment regimens used after disease progression. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical.

Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors after EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have become the gold standard for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been developed for the treatment of several malignancies, including lung cancer. However, it is known that ICIs have poorer efficacy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. METHODS: We collected data for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC receiving monotherapy with ICIs after EGFR-TKIs between December 2015 and March 2020 in three institutions, and retrospectively analyzed the association between patient characteristics and efficacy of ICIs. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were included in this study. We defined responders as patients undergoing 90 days or longer of ICI treatment. Comparing characteristics between responders and non-responders, more tumors with L858R EGFR mutation were observed in responders than in non-responders (L858R: 66.7% and 25.0%, respectively, p < 0.05). There was no difference in incidence of T790M resistance mutation before ICI treatment. The PD-L1 positive rate was slightly higher in responders but not statistically significant (22.2% and 12.5%, respectively). Median duration of EGFR-TKI pretreatment was shorter in ICI responders compared with nonresponders (13.3 and 19.9 months, respectively). The survival of patients with L858R tumors was significantly longer than that of patients with exon 19 deletion (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.13-0.93, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: ICI treatment tends to have better efficacy in patients with L858R-mutated tumors. This study suggests that patients with L858R-mutated NSCLC are candidates for ICI treatment after EGFR-TKI treatment.

The CLIP1-LTK fusion is an oncogenic driver in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer is one of the most aggressive tumour types. Targeted therapies stratified by oncogenic drivers have substantially improved therapeutic outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)1. However, such oncogenic drivers are not found in 25-40% of cases of lung adenocarcinoma, the most common histological subtype of NSCLC2. Here we identify a novel fusion transcript of CLIP1 and LTK using whole-transcriptome sequencing in a multi-institutional genome screening platform (LC-SCRUM-Asia, UMIN000036871). The CLIP1-LTK fusion was present in 0.4% of NSCLCs and was mutually exclusive with other known oncogenic drivers. We show that kinase activity of the CLIP1-LTK fusion protein is constitutively activated and has transformation potential. Treatment of Ba/F3 cells expressing CLIP1-LTK with lorlatinib, an ALK inhibitor, inhibited CLIP1-LTK kinase activity, suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis. One patient with NSCLC harbouring the CLIP1-LTK fusion showed a good clinical response to lorlatinib treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first description of LTK alterations with oncogenic activity in cancers. These results identify the CLIP1-LTK fusion as a target in NSCLC that could be treated with lorlatinib.

First-line pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: KEYNOTE-024 Japan subset.

This prespecified subanalysis of the global, randomized controlled phase III KEYNOTE-024 study of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or greater evaluated clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in Japan. Treatment consisted of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (35 cycles) or platinum-based chemotherapy (four to six cycles). The primary end-point was progression-free survival; secondary end-points included overall survival and safety. Of 305 patients randomized in KEYNOTE-024 overall, 40 patients were enrolled in Japan (all received treatment: pembrolizumab, n = 21; chemotherapy, n = 19). The hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival by independent central review (data cut-off date, 10 July 2017) was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.64; one-sided, nominal P = .001). The HR for overall survival (data cut-off date, 15 February 2019) was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.17-0.91; one-sided, nominal P = .012). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21/21 (100%) pembrolizumab-treated and 18/19 (95%) chemotherapy-treated patients; eight patients (38%) and nine patients (47%), respectively, had grade 3-5 events. Immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 11 patients (52%) and four patients (21%), respectively; four patients (19%) and one patient (5%), respectively, had grade 3-5 events. Consistent with results from KEYNOTE-024 overall, first-line pembrolizumab improved progression-free survival and overall survival vs chemotherapy with manageable safety among Japanese patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or greater. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02142738.

MK-6, a novel not-α IL-2, elicits a potent antitumor activity by improving the effector to regulatory T cell balance.

IL-2 is a pleiotropic cytokine that regulates immune cell homeostasis. Its immunomodulatory function has been used clinically as an active immunotherapy agent for metastatic cancers. However, severe adverse effects, including the vascular leak syndrome and the preferential stimulation of anti-immunogenic Treg rather than effector T cells, have been obstacles. We newly designed a mutein IL-2, Mutakine-6 (MK-6), with reduced IL-2Rα-binding capability. MK-6 induced comparable cell growth potential toward IL-2Rßγ-positive T cells but was far less efficient in in vitro Treg proliferation and STAT5 activation. Unlike IL-2, in vivo administration of MK-6 produced minimal adverse effects. Using CT26 and B16F10-syngeneic tumor models, we found MK-6 was highly efficacious on tumor regression. Serum albumin conjugation to MK-6 prolonged in vivo half-life and accumulated in CT26 tumors, showing enhanced antitumor effect. Tumor-infiltrating leukocytes analysis revealed that albumin-fused MK-6 increased the ratio of effector CD8+ T cells to CD4+ Treg cells. These results demonstrated that MK-6 is an efficient immunomodulator potentially used for improved immunotherapy with decreased adverse effects and attenuated Treg stimulation.

Randomized phase 2 study comparing irinotecan versus amrubicin as maintenance therapy after first-line induction therapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer (HOT1401/NJLCG1401).

BACKGROUND: A cisplatin plus irinotecan (CPT-11) regimen is used for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Amrubicin (AMR) is primarily used for relapsed SCLC. The HOT1401/NJLCG1401 trial, an open-label randomized phase II trial, was designed to assess the benefit of maintenance therapy in patients with ED-SCLC who responded to induction therapy. METHODS: Patients with histologically- or cytologically-confirmed ED-SCLC were included and were treated with an induction therapy of four cycles of cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1) plus CPT-11 (60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15) every four weeks. After induction therapy, patients who had nonprogressive disease were randomized to receive either maintenance CPT-11 (60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) every three weeks, or AMR (35 mg/m2 on days 1-3) every three weeks. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled; 20 patients had progressive disease or received incomplete induction chemotherapy. Finally, 14 patients were randomly assigned to receive CPT-11 (n = 7) or AMR (n = 7). This study was terminated prematurely because of low patient accrual. The overall objective response rate was 73%, the median PFS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.6-11.8), and the median overall survival was 20.1 months (95% CI: 13.7-not reached). No statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) were noted between patients treated with CPT-11 and those treated with AMR. There were no treatment-related deaths in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance therapy with CPT-11 or AMR after induction therapy might be effective in some patients.

Randomized phase II trial of uracil/tegafur and cisplatin versus pemetrexed and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced unresectable stage III non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: NJLCG1001.

BACKGROUND: The optimal regimen for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) of locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was not definitive. We conducted randomized phase II study, NJLCG0601, and chemoradiotherapy with uracil/tegafur (UFT) and cisplatin achieved promising efficacy without severe toxicities. Here, we evaluated between this regimen and pemetrexed plus cisplatin in chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-squamous NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with inoperable stage III non-squamous NSCLC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to UFT 400 mg/m2 on days 1-14 and 29-42, and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on days 8 and 36 (UP), or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 (PP). Involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) underwent from day 1 to a total dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions. Consolidation chemotherapy after CCRT was prohibited for this study. The primary endpoint was defined as 2-year overall survival (OS). This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000003948). RESULTS: From November 2010 to June 2017, 86 patients were entered from 11 institutions. Median follow-up was 54 months. Of the 85 eligible patients, the 2-year OS rate was 78.6% (95% CI, 62.8-88.3%) in UP and 85.5% (95% CI, 70.5-93.2%) in PP. Median PFS and OS was 12.3 and 64.2 months in UP, 26.2 months and not reached in PP, respectively. Grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia was more frequent in the UP group (14.0% vs. 2.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Both UP and PP with IFRT achieved the expected 2-year OS. PP engendered more favorable OS and PFS compared to UP in terms.

First-line pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: KEYNOTE-024 Japan subset.

This prespecified subanalysis of the global, randomized controlled phase III KEYNOTE-024 study of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or higher evaluated clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in Japan. Treatment consisted of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (35 cycles) or platinum-based chemotherapy (four to six cycles). The primary end-point was progression-free survival; secondary end-points included overall survival and safety. Of 305 patients randomized in KEYNOTE-024 overall, 40 patients were enrolled in Japan (all received treatment: pembrolizumab, n = 21; chemotherapy, n = 19). Median progression-free survival was 41.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-42.5) months with pembrolizumab and 4.1 (95% CI, 2.8-8.3) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27 [95% CI, 0.11-0.65]; one-sided, nominal P = .001). Median overall survival was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 22.9-NR) and 21.5 (95% CI, 5.2-35.0) months, respectively (HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.17-0.91]; one-sided, nominal P = .012). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21/21 (100%) pembrolizumab-treated and 18/19 (95%) chemotherapy-treated patients; eight patients (38%) and nine patients (47%), respectively, had grade 3-5 events. Immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 11 pembrolizumab-treated patients (52%) and four chemotherapy-treated patients (21%), respectively; four patients (19%) and one patient (5%), respectively, had grade 3-5 events. Consistent with results from KEYNOTE-024 overall, first-line pembrolizumab improved progression-free survival and overall survival vs chemotherapy with manageable safety among Japanese patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or higher. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02142738.

Evaluation of plasma EGFR mutation as an early predictor of response of erlotinib plus bevacizumab treatment in the NEJ026 study.

BACKGROUND: The NEJ026 Phase 3 study demonstrated that erlotinib and bevacizumab (BE)-treated NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations had significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) than those treated with erlotinib alone (E). This study included a prospective analysis of the relationship between the mutational status of EGFR in plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and the efficacy of TKI monotherapy or combination therapy. We describe these results herein. METHODS: Plasma samples were collected from patients enrolled in NEJ026 at the start of treatment (P0), 6 weeks after the start of treatment (P1), and upon confirmation of progressive disease (P2). Plasma ctDNA was analyzed using a modified PNA-LNA PCR clamp method. PFS and OS according to EGFR status at the time of plasma collection were evaluated. FINDINGS: Plasma activating EGFR mutation (aEGFR) at P0 was detected in 68% of cases; patients without plasma aEGFR had longer PFS. The frequency of T790M mutation at P2 was similar in both arms: 8 (19.0%) in BE and 11 (20.8%) in E. Based on the aEGFR profiles, PFS was evaluated among three groups: type A [P0(-), P1(-)], type B [P0(+), P1(-)], and type C [P0(+), P1(+)]. This revealed that BE was more efficacious than E, and that BE was associated with improved PFS in all types. INTERPRETATION: Pre-treatment plasma aEGFR status have a potential of early predictor of response of TKI efficacy. Monitoring plasma aEGFR mutation will contribute to selection and continuation of treatment with BE or E. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical.