Esomeprazole with aspirin versus clopidogrel for prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal ulcer complications.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of clopidogrel in patients at risk for gastrointestinal complications is uncertain, although it has been recommended for patients who have gastrointestinal intolerance to aspirin. We tested the hypothesis that clopidogrel is as effective as esomeprazole and aspirin in preventing recurrences of ulcer complications. METHODS: This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study of 170 patients who developed ulcer bleeding after the use of low-dose aspirin between November 2002 and January 2005. After healing of ulcers and eradication of Helicobacter pylori, if present, patients were assigned randomly to treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg/day and aspirin 100 mg/day (n = 86) or clopidogrel 75 mg/day (n = 84) for 52 weeks. The primary end point was recurrent ulcer complications. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 52 weeks, no patient in the esomeprazole group, as compared with 9 patients in the clopidogrel group, developed recurrent ulcer complications. The cumulative incidences of recurrent ulcer complications were 0% in patients receiving esomeprazole and aspirin and 13.6% in patients receiving clopidogrel (absolute difference, 13.6%; 95% confidence interval for the difference, 6.3-20.9; log-rank test, P = .0019). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of esomeprazole and aspirin is superior to clopidogrel in preventing ulcer complications in patients who have a past history of aspirin-related peptic ulcer bleeding.

Hepatitis B virus infection in dialysis patients.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major issue among dialysis patients. It is associated with a high risk of hepatic complication. The liver disease runs a unique clinical course in dialysis patients, as it can progress with modest hepatic inflammation and prominent fibrosis. The conventional cut-off level of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) for commencing antiviral therapy may prove too high and inappropriate for dialysis patients, and liver biopsy appears to be the only definitive means to establish the activity of liver disease in dialysis patients. Liver biopsy should be considered in patients with a serum ALT level that is persistently greater than 30 IU/L, or 0.75-fold the upper limit of the normal level, and/or other clinical and laboratory findings that suggest active liver disease. For antiviral treatment, preliminary reports have shown that lamivudine is effective and well tolerated in dialysis patients. However, the long-term efficacy of lamivudine and its optimal effective dose in dialysis patients remain unknown. The prevention of nosocomial transmission among dialysis patients is also important. Universal precaution measures should be strictly observed and the segregation of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive hemodialysis patients should be considered. For HBV non-immune patients, the importance of HBV vaccination should not be overemphasized. Until a new generation of highly immunogenic vaccines that are proven to be safe and effective in patients with end-stage renal disease becomes available, early vaccination before the development of end-stage renal failure remains the best way to secure immunological protection against HBV infection in dialysis patients.

Hepatitis B associated fulminant polyarteritis nodosa: successful treatment with pulse cyclophosphamide, prednisolone and lamivudine following emergency surgery.

For hepatitis B virus associated polyarteritis nodosa, alpha interferon and plasma exchanges have been proposed to be the first-line treatment. We report a case of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive fulminant polyarteritis nodosa with predominant gastrointestinal involvement who showed good response to pulse cyclophosphamide, prednisolone, and lamivudine therapy. The patient, a 22-year-old man, presented with a short history of epigastric pain. Initial upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed gastritis and duodenal erosions. His pain did not respond to H2-receptor antagonists. He had slightly impaired liver function tests, and was HBsAg and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive. Around 3 weeks after initial presentation, he developed massive gastrointestinal haemorrhage requiring resuscitation and emergency laparotomy. Microscopic examination of the resection specimens revealed necrotizing vasculitis of small and medium-sized arteries in the submucosa compatible with polyarteritis nodosa. The patient was treated with pulse cyclophosphamide and prednisolone, with lamivudine being added when he showed an acute rise in liver enzymes. He subsequently developed HBeAg seroconversion, and remained well 18 months after cessation of all immunosuppressives. We believe that the efficacy of pulse cyclophosphamide, prednisolone, and lamivudine in the treatment of hepatitis B virus associated polyarteritis nodosa, especially in comparison with interferon and plasma exchanges, deserves further evaluation.