[Immediate fetal-maternal morbidity of first instrumental vaginal delivery using Thierry's spatulas. A prospective continuous study of 195 fetal extractions]. / Morbidité maternofoetale immédiate de l'accouchement assisté par spatules de Thierry chez la primipare. A propos d'une série prospective continue de 195 extractions.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the immediate fetal-maternal morbidity related to Thierry's spatula for first instrumental vaginal delivery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in Toulouse university hospital, including primiparas who vaginally delivered a live singleton cephalic infant>36 WG, between December 2005 and June 2006. Instrumental deliveries were performed using short spatulas in all cases. Outcome measures were: perineal complications (episiotomy, laceration and associated lesions, urinary retention, pain at H48), neonatal morbidity (cutaneous injuries, neonatal transfer, cord pH, Apgar score). Instrumental deliveries were compared with spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVD). RESULTS: Six hundred and eight primiparas were included, distributed in 195 extractions (32%) and 413 SVD (68%). Spatulas allowed fetal extraction in all cases. Main differences between the two groups were: length of labour, occiput posterior position (12.8% for spatulas vs 1.7% for SVD; p<0.0001), episiotomy rate (97.9% vs 51.3%; p<0.0001), severe perineal lacerations (3.6% vs 0.2%; p=0.0007), post-partum morbidity (pain, hematoma, and urinary retention). No case of early severe neonatal complication was related to the use of the spatulas. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Perineal complications (severe lacerations) associated with spatulas are increased with regard to SVD, but comparable to that reported with forceps. The main disadvantage is the high frequency of episiotomy, which should not be systematic. Neonatal morbidity is reduced. Comparative studies (spatulas vs. other procedures) are needed to confirm these data, but spatulas remain a multipurpose instrument which should continue to be taught.

[Characteristics of mepivacaine axillary brachial plexus block performed at 2800 m of altitude]. / Caractéristiques du bloc axillaire à la mépivacaïne réalisé à 2800 m d'altitude.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the feasibility and pharmacodynamic profile of axillary brachial plexus nerve blocks performed in high altitude. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study was performed in healthy volunteers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten male volunteers received 20 ml of 1.5% mepivacaine on radial and median nerves (total 40 ml), first at altitude of 150 then at 2877 m. Onset and offset times for sensory, motor and sympathetic blocks were recorded. Blood was sampled up to 60 min after injection to measure plasma concentrations of mepivacaine. RESULTS: At 150 and 2877 m of altitude, onset times for blocks were similar. Duration of sensory and motor blocks was not different at low and high altitude (193+/-35 min and 180+/-47 min; and 237+/-32 min and 217+/-44 min, respectively). Plasma mepivacaine concentrations were significantly lower at 20 minutes in high altitude (p<0.05). At higher altitude, one patient showed clinical signs of neurological toxicity, with plasma concentrations of mepivacaine ranging from 0.94 to 1.21 mug/ml. CONCLUSION: At altitude of 2877 m, axillary brachial plexus block with 1.5% mepivacaine is feasible, with onset and offset times for sensory and motor effects similar to those performed at 150 m.

Double- vs. single-injection infraclavicular plexus block in the emergency setting: higher success rate with lower volume of local anaesthetic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Infraclavicular plexus block has many advantages of particular interest in the emergency setting. However, the number of nerve stimulations needed to optimize the technique remains unclear. We evaluated both the local anaesthetic requirement and the success rate of Sim's derived infraclavicular plexus block performed with a nerve stimulator when either one or two responses were sought. METHODS: In this prospective study, 50 patients who presented for distal upper limb surgery were randomized into two groups: in Group 1, ropivacaine 0.75% 40 mL was injected when nerve stimulation elicited a distal motor response (median, ulnar or radial). In Group 2, only 30 mL of the same local anaesthetic was injected, 7 mL to the musculocutaneous nerve and 23 mL to the median, ulnar or radial nerves. Sensory and motor blocks were tested at 5-min intervals over 30 min. RESULTS: The time to perform the block was similar in both groups. The success rate of the block increased from 80% in the single-stimulation group to 92% in the double-stimulation group (not significant). The onset time of sensory and motor block was shorter and block extension was greater in ulnar, antebrachial cutaneous and brachial cutaneous nerve distributions in the multistimulation group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that only 30 mL of local anaesthetic seems to be sufficient to ensure a high level of success when performing an infraclavicular block with stimulation of both the musculocutaneous nerve and median, ulnar or radial nerve.

[Evaluation of regional anesthesia procedure in an emergency department]. / Evaluation de l'utilisation de l'anesthésie locorégionale dans un service d'urgence.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of regional anaesthesia procedures for limb traumatic surgery performed in an emergency department. METHOD: Anaesthetic procedures concerning traumatic emergencies have been studied from 1995 to 2000. RESULTS: A 32% increase in anaesthesia practice was observed from 1995 (221) to 2000 (292) with a 52% increase in regional anaesthesia. Since 1996, regional anaesthesia represents more than 80% of the anaesthetic procedures and 90% for the upper limb surgery (66% of the surgical procedures). Axillary block (50%), interscalene brachial plexus block (15%) and combined sciatic and femoral nerve block (17%) were the main regional anaesthesia procedures. Spinal anaesthesia (9 cases) and intravenous locoregional anaesthesia (12 cases) were rarely used. CONCLUSION: In our study, regional anaesthesia is the most used technique when compared to general anaesthesia for emergency procedure. The anaesthetic staff has to be motivated and trained.

[Management of acute respiratory distress syndrome in Midi-Pyrnees]. / Prise en charge du syndrome de détresse respiratoire aiguë en Midi-Pyrénées.

OBJECTIVE: To assess management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in Midi-Pyrénées, France. METHODS: A prospective study using a questionnaire divided into 10 parts, definition, etiology, radiography, computed tomography, management, was conducted in 26 intensive care units in the Midi-Pyrénées. Management of ARDS in Midi-Pyrénées was comparted with management elsewhere as described in the literature. RESULTS: Overall participation rate was 73%. Disparities were found concerning the definition. Four etiologies accounted for 75% of all ARDS cases. Chest x-rays were used for positive diagnosis and thoracic scans for complications. Ventilatory and hemodynamic optimizations were the first line therapy used. Twenty-nine percent and 41% of the intensive care unites used nitric oxide and prone position respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences between ARDS management in Midi-Pyrénées and that described in the current literature. Epidemiologic studies such as this one are necessary before publishing guidelines for the management of ARDS.