MHC-class-II are expressed in a subpopulation of human neural stem cells in vitro in an IFNγ-independent fashion and during development.

Expression of major histocompatibility antigens class-2 (MHC-II) under non-inflammatory conditions is not usually associated with the nervous system. Comparative analysis of immunogenicity of human embryonic/fetal brain-derived neural stem cells (hNSCs) and human mesenchymal stem cells with neurogenic potential from umbilical cord (UC-MSCs) and paediatric adipose tissue (ADSCs), while highlighting differences in their immunogenicity, led us to discover subsets of neural cells co-expressing the neural marker SOX2 and MHC-II antigen in vivo during human CNS development. MHC-II proteins in hNSCs are functional, and differently regulated upon differentiation along different lineages. Mimicking an inflammatory response using the inflammatory cytokine IFNγ induced MHC-II up-regulation in both astrocytes and hNSCs, but not in UC-MSCs and ADSCs, either undifferentiated or differentiated, though IFNγ receptor expression was comparable. Together, hypoimmunogenicity of both UC-MSCs and ADSCs supports their suitability for allogeneic therapy, while significant immunogenicity of hNSCs and their progeny may at least in part underlie negative effects reported in some patients following embryonic neural cell grafts. Crucially, we show for the first time that MHC-II expression in developing human brains is not restricted to microglia as previously suggested, but is present in discrete subsets of neural progenitors and appears to be regulated independently of inflammatory stimuli.

A matter of identity - Phenotype and differentiation potential of human somatic stem cells.

Human somatic stem cells with neural differentiation potential can be valuable for developing cell-based therapies, including treatment of birth-related defects, while avoiding issues associated with cell reprogramming. Precisely defining the "identity" and differentiation potential of somatic stem cells from different sources, has proven difficult, given differences in sets of specific markers, protocols used and lack of side-by-side characterization of these cells in different studies. Therefore, we set to compare expression of mesenchymal and neural markers in human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs), pediatric adipose-derived stem cells (p-ADSCs) in parallel with human neural stem cells (NSCs). We show that UC-MSCs at a basal level express mesenchymal and so-called "neural" markers, similar to that we previously reported for the p-ADSCs. All somatic stem cell populations studied, independently from tissue and patient of origin, displayed a remarkably similar expression of surface markers, with the main difference being the restricted expression of CD133 and CD34 to NSCs. Expression of certain surface and neural markers was affected by the expansion medium used. As predicted, UC-MSCs and p-ADSCs demonstrated tri-mesenchymal lineage differentiation potential, though p-ADSCs display superior chondrogenic differentiation capability. UC-MSCs and p-ADSCs responded also to neurogenic induction by up-regulating neuronal markers, but crucially they appeared morphologically immature when compared with differentiated NSCs. This highlights the need for further investigation into the use of these cells for neural therapies. Crucially, this study demonstrates the lack of simple means to distinguish between different cell types and the effect of culture conditions on their phenotype, and indicates that a more extensive set of markers should be used for somatic stem cell characterization, especially when developing therapeutic approaches.

Assessing the toxic effects of DMSO on cord blood to determine exposure time limits and the optimum concentration for cryopreservation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Advantages of using cord blood (CB) over other sources of haematopoietic progenitor cells, such as bone marrow, include the ability to cryopreserve and bank the samples until requested for a transplant. Cryopreservation requires the addition of a cryoprotectant to prevent the formation of intracellular ice during freezing. Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) is commonly used at a concentration of 10% (v/v); however, there is evidence to suggest this chemical is toxic to cells as well as to patients after infusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The toxic effects of DMSO were assessed through cell viability and in vitro functional assays in fresh and post-thaw CB samples before determining the maximum exposure time and optimal concentration for cryopreservation. RESULTS: A dose-dependent toxicity of DMSO was observed in fresh samples with 40% removing all viable and functional haematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC). In fresh and post-thaw analysis, minimal toxic effect was observed when cryopreservation was delayed for up to 1 h after 10% DMSO addition. After thawing, DMSO washout was superior to dilution or unmanipulated when maintained for long periods (advantage observed 1 h after thawing). Finally, the optimum concentration for cryopreserving CB was found to be 7.5 to 10% with detrimental effects observed outside of this range. CONCLUSION: These results support the use of 7.5-10% as the optimal DMSO concentration and the maximum exposure time should be limited to <1 h prior to freezing and 30 min post-thaw.

Quality rather than quantity: the cord blood bank dilemma.

Growing inventories of cord blood units have facilitated access to umbilical cord cell transplantation for many patients lacking conventional stem cell donors. They are in principle 'off-the-shelf', 'fit-for-use', as well as safe and effective therapy products. Cellular enumeration is used as a surrogate of graft potency, and users rely on the rigorous assessment carried out in banks to avoid poor engraftment after thawing (loss of cells or poor function), when the patient's situation is critical. However, in practice, when units are selected, initially on the basis of HLA matching and cell dose assessment, their absolute quality remains uncertain. Unfortunately, quality-related issues (particularly related to viability) are not uncommon in cord blood transplantation. The reasons for potency failures are diverse, but a lack of thorough validation during critical steps of the process and of appropriate use of quality-control tools for timely detection of problematic units are significant contributors. Moreover, incongruence between different sets of standards and regulations, and lack of common quality systems between banks result in a highly heterogeneous international inventory. Therefore, this complicates the matter for the end user of the product. To ameliorate this situation, it is essential to improve quality at each of the critical manufacturing steps wherein potency can be threatened, thereby creating homogeneous inventories of units with excellent quality and quantity.

In vitro hematotoxicity of Aplidine on human bone marrow and cord blood progenitor cells.

Aplidine is a cyclic depsipeptide that was isolated from a Mediterranean marine tunicate, Aplidium albicans. In experimental animals, Aplidine mediated an in vivo inhibitory effect in a number of tumor cell types. In humans, Aplidine is currently used in phase I clinical trials. Aiming to predict the hematotoxicity of Aplidine in humans, samples from human bone marrow (BM) and cord blood (CB) were exposed in vitro to increasing concentrations of the drug and then assayed for the clonogenic ability of myeloid (CFU-GM), erythroid (BFU-E), megakaryocitic (CFU-Meg) and pluripotent (CFU-Mix) hematopoietic progenitors. We investigated whether predictions of the hematotoxicity of Aplidine based on bone marrow (BM) cultures were reproduced when a more readily available source of human hematopoietic cells, cord blood cells, was used in experiments involving 24-h exposures. Although hematopoietic progenitors derived from bone marrow were generally more sensitive than those derived from cord blood, differences on the IC50, IC70 and IC90 varied within a relatively small range of 1.6-6.2-fold. Moreover, data obtained from cord blood cultures confirmed the observation made in bone marrow assays indicating that the myeloid (CFU-GM) and the erythroid (BFU-E) progenitors were the least sensitive to Aplidine. Regardless of the origin of the hematopoietic progenitors (bone marrow or cord blood) the toxicity of Aplidine in human hematopoietic progenitors (IC50: 150-2250 nM) was lower than that observed in previous studies with tumoral cell lines.