The John Hopkins classification system used in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures requires more experience than the Gartland system.

The Gartland classification is used to decide on surgery. In contrast, the John Hopkins classification system predicts clinical outcomes for patients undergoing surgery and determines the risk of reduction loss. This study aims to investigate the usability of the Gartland and the John Hopkins classification systems by pediatric and general orthopedic surgeons. The preoperative images of 200 patients who presented at a tertiary-level trauma center with a supracondylar humerus fracture were examined by 4 observers, twice at an interval of 6 weeks. The observers comprised 2 pediatric orthopedic surgeons and 2 orthopedics and traumatology surgeons. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were excellent for the first and second measurements of the Gartland classification. The inter-observer agreement of the pediatric orthopedic surgeons and the general orthopedic surgeons was found to be similar (ICC >90). Inter-observer reliability was excellent (ICC: 0.808) and good (ICC: 0.732) for the measurements of the John Hopkins classification, respectively. The inter-observer agreement of the pediatric orthopedic surgeons and the general orthopedic surgeons was not similar. The inter-observer agreement between the two pediatric orthopedic surgeons was excellent for the measurements (ICC: 0.868; ICC: 0.756, respectively). The inter-observer agreement between the two general orthopedic surgeons was good for the measurements (ICC: 0.605; ICC: 0.663, respectively). The John Hopkins classification system has good intra- and inter-observer reliability, and a high experience level increases the agreement. The Gartland classification system was not affected by experience. This should be considered when taking measurements in studies and patient management.

Reliability of Gordon Lateral Rotation Percentage and Prabhakar Percentage of Metaphyseal Overhang for Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture; Is it Clinically Reliable for John Hopkins Classification Coronal Fracture Subtypes?

BACKGROUND: Rotational malalignment is a common problem in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF). Several techniques have been described to evaluate the true rotation value. Although the Prabhakar and Gordon techniques are used frequently, their superiority to each other in terms of measurement quality is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical compatibility of the 2 techniques and to evaluate whether they are suitable for all subtypes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 40 patients with SCHF (including subtypes; Typical, Medial Oblique, Lateral Oblique, and High fracture pattern). The Gordon lateral rotation percentage and Prabhakar percentage of metaphyseal overhang were measured twice by 4 experienced Orthopedics and Traumatology surgeons at 8-week intervals. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability were examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The interobserver reliability for Gordon and Prabhakar technique was 0.816 and 0.762 for the first measurement and 0.811 and 0.811 for the second measurement, respectively.The medial oblique fracture pattern was determined to have the best interobserver agreement among the subtypes. The result was excellent for the medial and lateral oblique subtypes, good for the typical fracture pattern, and fair for the high fracture pattern. The intraobserver reliability for Gordon and Prabhakar technique was excellent, 0.924 and 0.922, respectively. CONCLUSION: The main finding of this study was that the Gordon and Prabhakar techniques have similar interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Although the Gordon technique tends to have higher interobserver reliability, the difference was clinically insignificant. These measurements should not be relied upon in cases of SCHF with a high fracture pattern because of the different anatomic features of that region. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Hawthorne Effect in Gait Analysis of Children with In-Toeing Caused by Increased Femoral Anteversion.

Background: In-toeing is one of the main reasons children are applying to the orthopedics clinic. In the clinical settings, during in-toeing gait assessment parents often define that their child does not walk same at the clinic as at home, linked possibly to Hawthorne effect. Research Question: How does the in-toeing angle differ when children are aware, versus when they are not aware of their gait inspection? Methods: This single center, clinical, cross-sectional, observational study looked into the variation in gait pattern of twelve children with in-toeing, with and without their awareness. Two videos for each child was recorded with a smart phone, once at the clinic while aware and once by the family without awareness, and uploaded into Kinovea software for gait analysis. The angle of foot in-toeing was measured and analyzed using SPSS comparison of means and correlations. Results: The gait pattern evaluated with the angle of in-toeing showed a significant difference between the two videos of the same child. The angle difference returned a p value of 0.000 using paired sample t test and a Cohen's d value of 1.4, representing the large significance between clinic and family recorded videos. The initial foot in-toeing angle showed a moderate positive Pearson's correlation of 0.031 when compared with the angle difference in both settings. Significance: These results highlight the importance of including family recorded videos in gait pattern analysis without the patient's awareness. The study not only shows the significant difference found which can be explained by Hawthorne Effect but also suggests a clearer path of understanding the child's condition with the family.