The Italian Fibromyalgia Registry: a new way of using routine real-world data concerning patient-reported disease status in healthcare research and clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: Fibromyalgia (FM), the most frequently encountered cause of widespread musculoskeletal pain, affects an estimated 2% of the general Italian population. However, it is not a homogeneous clinical entity, and a number of interacting factors can influence patient prognosis and the outcomes of standardised treatment programmes. Registries are a source of high-quality data for clinical research, but relating this information to individual patients is technically challenging. The aim of this article is to describe the structure and objectives of the first Italian Fibromyalgia Registry (IFR), a new web-based registry of patients with FM. METHODS: The IFR was developed to collect, store, and share information electronically entered by physicians throughout Italy who are members of the Italian Society of Rheumatology and have a particular interest in FM. It has a web-based architecture that uses two separate servers and an encryption algorithm to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of the exchanged data. The questionnaires included on the platform are the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status (ModFAS), and the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale (PDS). RESULTS: The registry includes data relating to 2,339 patients (93.2% female) who satisfied the 1990 or 2010/2011 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Fibromyalgia at the time of diagnosis. At the time of this analysis, the patients had a mean age of 51.9 years (SD 11.5) and a mean disease duration of 7.3 years (SD 6.9). The majority were married (71.3%), and generally well educated. The overall median FIQR, ModFAS and PDS scores and 25th-75th percentiles were respetively 61.16 (41.16-77.00), 8.91 (41.16-77.00), and 19.0 (13.00-24.00). The six highest scoring items indicating the greatest impact of the disease on the patients related to fatigue/energy (7.18), sleep quality (6.87), tenderness (6.69), pain (6.68), stiffness (6.66), and environmental sensitivity (6.35). A high proportion of the responding patients reported experiencing pain in the neck (80.46%), upper back (68.36%), and lower back (75.05%). CONCLUSIONS: The IFR is the most comprehensive FM registry in Italy, and provides healthcare professionals with a secure, reliable, and easy-to-use means of monitoring the patients' clinical progression, treatment history and treatment responses. This can help clinicians to plan patient management, facilitates research study patient recruitment, and provides the participating pain clinics with statistics based on real-world data. It also helps address the Italian Ministry of Health long-term goal of using precision medicine for chronic pain prevention and treatment. It is hoped that the IFR will enhance both scientific research and clinical practice.

The Presence of Uveitis Is Associated with a Sustained Response to the Interleukin (IL)-1 Inhibitors Anakinra and Canakinumab in Behçet's Disease.

Purpose: To identify factors associated with sustained response to interleukin (IL)-1 inhibition among demographic, clinical and therapeutic data in patients with Behçet disease (BD).Methods: BD patients treated with anakinra or canakinumab were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to the clinical response: group 1 included subjects showing a treatment duration of at least 52 weeks and no secondary inefficacy during the first follow-up year; the remaining patients were included in the group 2. Demographic, clinical and therapeutic data were analyzed to identify significant differences between groups.Results: Eighteen patients were included in group 1 and 18 patients in group 2. A better response to IL-1 inhibitors was significantly more common among patients with BD-related uveitis (p = 0.006) and patients with a longer disease duration (p = 0.03).Conclusion: IL-1 blockade is effective in BD, especially in the subset of patients presenting eye involvement and in those with long-lasting disease.

Abatacept retention and clinical outcomes in Austrian patients with rheumatoid arthritis: real-world data from the 2-year ACTION study.

BACKGROUND: AbataCepT In rOutiNe clinical practice (ACTION; NCT02109666) was a 2-year international observational study of patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Baseline characteristics, abatacept retention rates, and clinical outcomes were compared by treatment line in the Austrian cohort of ACTION. RESULTS: Of 100 patients enrolled in Austria, 98 (98.0%) were evaluable: 33/98 (33.7%) biologic naïve and 65/98 (66.3%) with ≥1 prior biologic failure. At baseline, biologic-naïve patients had shorter disease duration and lower concomitant corticosteroid use than biologic-failure patients. Overall crude abatacept retention rate was 60.5% and retention rate was higher in biologic-naïve (65.1%) versus biologic-failure (58.0%) patients. Good/moderate EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) response rates were 85.7% in biologic-naïve and 100% in biologic-failure patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the Austrian cohort of ACTION, overall abatacept retention at 2 years was high, with higher retention rates in patients receiving abatacept as an earlier treatment line. Good/moderate EULAR response rate was higher in biologic-failure than in biologic-naïve patients.

An observational prospective study on predictors of clinical response at six months in patients with active psoriatic arthritis treated with golimumab.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, research has been focused on the identification of predictors of response to treatment in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The objective of this study was to develop a model to predict the clinical response at 6 months in patients with PsA starting the anti-tumour necrosis factor-α golimumab. METHODS: This prospective observational study explored a range of factors, including demographic data and baseline characteristics of the disease, measures of disease activity and functional disability, and potential laboratory biomarkers in the prediction of response, defined as the achievement of modified-minimal disease activity (mMDA), to golimumab in PsA patients. RESULTS: We studied 151 PsA patients starting golimumab because of their active disease. After 6 months, the rate of drug persistence on golimumab was 80%, and mMDA was achieved in 44.3% of patients. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, lower disease activity in PsA score (DAPSA) at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.96, p<0.001) was independent predictor of mMDA at 6 months. High sensitivity C-reactive protein value (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00-1.13, p=0.026) at baseline also was a predictive factor of mMDA achievement at 6 months in the laboratory-enhanced prediction model. Golimumab was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of factors predictive of response to treatment may help in better understanding the response to golimumab and in identifying PsA patients that are most likely to achieve mMDA following therapy with golimumab.

Risk factors of damage in early diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus: results of the Italian multicentre Early Lupus Project inception cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors for damage development in a prospective inception cohort of early diagnosed SLE patients. METHODS: The Early Lupus Project recruited an inception cohort of patients within 12 months of SLE classification (1997 ACR criteria). At enrolment and every 6 months thereafter, the SLICC/ACR Damage Index was recorded. The contribution of baseline and time-varying covariates to the development of damage, defined as any SLICC/ACR Damage Index increase from 0 to ≥1, was assessed using univariate analysis. Forward-backward Cox regression models were fitted with covariates with P < 0.05 to identify factors independently associated with the risk of damage development. RESULTS: Overall, 230 patients with a mean (s.d.) age of 36.5 (14.4) years were eligible for this study; the mean number of visits per patient was 5.3 (2.7). There were 51 (22.2%) patients with SLICC/ACR Damage Index ≥1 after 12 months, 59 (25.6%) after 24 months and 67 (29.1%) after 36 months. Dyslipidaemia [P = 0.001; hazard ratio (HR) 2.9; 95% CI 1.5, 5.6], older age (P = 0.001; HR 3.0; 95% CI 1.6, 5.5), number of organs/systems involved (P = 0.002; HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1, 1.8) and cardiorespiratory involvement (P = 0.041; HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.0, 3.7) were independently associated with an increased risk of developing damage. Risk profiles for damage development differed for glucocorticoid-related and -unrelated damage. HCQ use (P = 0.005; HR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2, 0.8) reduced the risk of glucocorticoid-unrelated damage. CONCLUSION: We identified risk factors of damage development, but little effect of glucocorticoids, in this early SLE cohort. Addressing modifiable risk factors from the time of SLE diagnosis might improve patient outcomes.

Can we wean patients with inflammatory arthritis from biological therapies?

Biological therapies have represented a cornerstone in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Their advent combined with implementation of a treat-to-target approach has meant that remission or low disease activity are now realistic targets for treatment achieved by a significant number of patients. However, biologicals are not risk free and their elevated costs continue to present an important economic burden to national healthcare services. "Can we wean patients with inflammatory arthritis from biological therapies?" Over the last decade this question has become increasingly important as to define the best management strategies in terms of efficacy, safety and economic outcomes. Not surprisingly this has generated an interesting debate as to whether reasons to taper biologics outweigh reasons not to taper and evidence in support of either of these schools of thought is persistently growing. AIM: In this article we reviewed the contents of the relevant session from the 2019 Controversies in Rheumatology and Autoimmunity meeting in Florence.

Biosimilars vs originators: Are they the same?

Biological drugs have revolutionised the treatment of rheumatic diseases, and the recent expiry of the patents for many biological agents has generated considerable interest among pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies, and led to the marketing of highly similar, low-cost versions known as biosimilars. The increasing trend of switching patients from effective but expensive drugs to their biosimilar counterparts will have a considerable economic impact in the coming years. However, although this will greatly extend patient access the latest treatments, clinicians, scientific societies and the patients themselves have expressed a number of concerns about their long-term efficacy and safety, as well as the consequences of potentially multiple switches being dictated by economic pressure rather than medical needs. Thee aim of this review is to evaluate the pros and cons of choosing biosimilars, and whether and when they can really be considered clinically equivalent to the original drugs.

Antiphospholipid syndrome's genetic and epigenetic aspects.

Studies on last genetic and epigenetic predisposition to APS are summarized. It is well known that genetic predisposition is in HLA system (DR4 and DRw53) and that lupus anticoagulant (LA) and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) are both associated with the same HLA antigens. Other genes, outside the MHC, give their contribution to the development of this autoimmune syndrome, such as IRF5, STAT4 and those related to inherited thrombophilia - factor V Leiden and G20210A prothrombin polymorphisms. Finally, post-transcriptional modifications of anti-beta2GPI antibodies could be implicated too. The most important discovery of last years is that altered microRNAs' expression is linked to autoimmunity, thrombosis, early atherosclerosis, and oxidative stress in APS.

Rheumatic immune related adverse events in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors for immunotherapy of cancer.

Immune checkpoints are small molecules expressed by immune cells that play critical roles in maintaining immune homeostasis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) are new cancer drugs that target self-tolerance pathways exploited by tumors to escape immune destruction, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1). Several ICPIs have been approved by Food and Drug Administration, increasing overall survival with different cancers. However, their use can determine development of many different inflammatory side effects, that are defined immune-related adverse effects (irAEs); among others, rheumatological irAEs can develop in these patients. Currently, we have limited data about these adverse effects; particularly, few evidence come from clinical trials about patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases because they were excluded from them. Therefore we analysed the existing scientific literature dealing with this issue, in order to answer to different clinical questions. According to all reviewed data, rheumatological irAEs are not infrequent, in both previously diseased and undiseased patients, but they are often mild and reversible. Close monitoring and interdisciplinary management and monitoring is necessary in order to ensure best care. Many questions remain unanswered or not completely answered; further data are necessary to implement our knowledge in this field and to standardize and optimize clinical practice.

Correction to: Predictors of abatacept retention over 2 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the real-world ACTION study.

The article listed above was initially published with incorrect copyright information. Upon publication of this Correction, the copyright of this article changed to "The Author(s)". The original article has been corrected.

Different drug survival of first line tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a multicentre retrospective survey.

OBJECTIVES: Good drug survival of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) has been shown in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients treated in real-life setting. However, few studies have compared drug survival of the first TNF inhibitor between radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) and non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) patients in real-world clinical practice. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness by assessing the retention rate of first-line TNFi in r-axSpA and nr-axSpA patients. Baseline predictive factors for TNFi discontinuation were also evaluated. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed axSpA patients, who underwent first line therapy with TNFi. Demographic and clinical data was obtained through structured interview, review of medical records and physical examination. Disease activity indices such as the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score evaluating C Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP), Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) were assessed at baseline. Moreover Health Assessment QuestionnaireDisability Index (HAQ), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, mm/h), CRP (mg/dl) and HLA-B27 were recorded as well. Data on x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints were also collected. Drug retention rates were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves; log-rank test was performed to demonstrate differences in the survival functions. Cox regression models were used to estimate the inference of several disease and clinical characteristics on drug discontinuation. RESULTS: Drug survival of first-line TNFi was significantly lower in patients who had nr-axSpA than in those with r-axSpA (p=0.005). HLA-B27 frequency was higher in patients with x-ray sacroiliitis than in those with nr-axSpA (p=0.01) as well as mean CRP serum level (p=0.0001), whereas both mean BASDAI and LEI score were higher in patients with nr-axSpA than in those with r-axSpA (p=0.018 and p=0.007, respectively). Global retention rate in our cohort was 60.34% with mean survival time (MST) of 58.68 months (95% CI 47.93-69.42). MST for patients diagnosed with r-axSpA was 66.79 months (95% CI 53.54-80.04) and 39.05 months (95% CI 24.12-53.99) for those with nr-axSpA. Moreover, nr-axSpA (HR 1.620), higher BMI (HR 1.093) and BASFI, (HR 1.192) had an impact on drug discontinuation, whereas HLA-B27 presence (HR. 0.523) had protective effect. CONCLUSIONS: Effectiveness of TNFi, seems to be lower in nr-axSpA patients than in those with r-axSpA. In addition obesity and functional disability negatively impact the persistence on first line TNFi in axSpA patients in real life setting.

Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol and golimumab in the treatment of non-infectious uveitis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of golimumab (GOL) and certolizumab pegol (CZP) as additional treatment options for the treatment of uveitis. METHODS: Patients with longstanding uveitis receiving either GOL or CZP were retrospectively evaluated in terms of frequency of ocular flares, drug survival, changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and steroid-sparing effect. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (30 eyes), 17 of whom being female, were enrolled in the study; 16 out of 21 patients had been previously treated with other tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α blockers. A significant reduction in ocular flares (from 128.6 bouts for 100 patients-year to 42.9 events for 100 patients-year) was observed between the 12 months prior to the start of GOL or CZP and the 12 months thereafter (p=0.01). The 36-month drug survival was 54.5% for CZP and 50.0% for GOL with no statistically significant differences between the two biologic agents. No differences were detected concerning BCVA values and the mean corticosteroid intake between baseline and the last follow-up. The safety profile was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: GOL and CZP represent effective and safe treatment choices for patients with uveitis also when unsuccessfully treated with other anti-TNF-α drugs, permitting a significant reduction in the frequency of ocular flares and preserving visual function with a good long-term retention rate.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints in SpA: with or without intravenous contrast media? A preliminary report.

OBJECT: Active sacroiliitis based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without intravenous (I.V.) contrast material injection is considered sufficient for the diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA), according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria. This work shows the added value of administering I.V. contrast material when evaluating the response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists therapy, on the extension of bone marrow oedema (BMO) and pathological enhancement (osteitis/synovitis) in the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) on MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients (25 females and 18 males, mean age of 54 ± 16.60 years, range 22-75 years) with a clinical diagnosis of SpA and active sacroiliitis at MRI with I.V. contrast material, were considered for a follow-up MRI after 6 months of TNF antagonists therapy. Disease activity was monitored by a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Student's t test and Cohen's kappa were used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were finally included in the study; 36 of them showed an improvement on clinical assessment after therapy. Score's difference (improvement) after treatment was calculated in the MRI sequences both with and without contrast agent (respectively, mean value and range 3.18, 0-12 with contrast and 1.63, 0-7 without contrast). This improvement was statistically significant in each group (P value of 7.097e-08 with contrast and 6.741e-06 without contrast), and there was a significant difference between the two group too (P-value of 8.598e-07). Cohen's kappa for dichotomous variables showed a better agreement between the post-contrast MRI findings and BASDAI (K = 0.53, agreement = 92.11%, P = 0.0001) than MRI without contrast and BASDAI (K = 0.11, agreement = 57.89%, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of enhancement is a reliable tool for the assessment of the response to therapy in SIJs involvement in SpA, better than BMO; hence, it should be advised in the MRI of these patients.

Efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibodies in patients with non-infectious anterior uveitis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of monoclonal anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents in patients with anterior uveitis (AU) in terms of decrease of recurrences, variation of visual acuity and steroid sparing effect and to identify any demographic, clinical or therapeutic variables associated with a sustained response to monoclonal TNF-α inhibitors. METHODS: Data from patients suffering from AU treated with adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab or certolizumab pegol were retrospectively collected and statistically analysed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (22 males, 47 females), corresponding to 101 eyes, were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 29.25±23.51 months. The rate of ocular flares decreased from 42.03 events/100 patients/year recorded during the 12 months preceding the start of TNF-α inhibitors to 2.9 flares/100 patients/year after the start of treatment (p<0.0001). The overall decrease in ocular flares was 93.1%. No statistically significant changes were identified in the best corrected visual acuity during the follow-up period (p>0.99). The number of patients treated with corticosteroids at baseline was significantly higher compared with that referred to the 12-month evaluation (p<0.001) and to the last follow-up visit (p=0.006). Concomitant treatment with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) represented the sole clinical, demographic or therapeutic variable associated with long-term treatment duration (p=0.045, R2=0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Monoclonal TNF-α inhibitors induce a remarkable decrease in the recurrence of AU during a long-term follow-up period and lead to a significant steroid sparing effect along with stabilisation of visual acuity. Concomitant treatment with cDMARDs represented the sole variable associated with treatment duration in the long-term.

Predictors of abatacept retention over 2 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the real-world ACTION study.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate abatacept retention over 2 years in the AbataCepT In rOutiNe clinical practice (ACTION) study. METHOD: ACTION was an international, observational study of patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who initiated intravenous abatacept. Crude abatacept retention rates over 2 years were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses in biologic-naive and -failure patients. Clinically relevant risk factors and significant prognostic factors for retention were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards multivariable model. RESULTS: Overall, 2350/2364 enrolled patients were evaluable; 673 (28.6%) were biologic naive and 1677 (71.4%) had prior biologic failure (1 biologic, 728/1677 [43.4%]; ≥ 2 biologics, 949/1677 [56.6%]). Abatacept retention rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) at 2 years was 47.9% (45.7, 50.0): 54.5% (50.4, 58.3) for biologic-naive vs 45.2% (42.7, 47.7) for biologic-failure patients (log-rank P < 0.001). For patients with 1 and ≥ 2 prior biologic failures, respectively, retention rates (95% CI) were 50.2% (46.3, 53.9) vs 41.3% (38.0, 44.6; log-rank P < 0.001). Main reasons for discontinuation (biologic-naive vs biologic-failure, respectively) were lack of efficacy (61.4 vs 67.7%) and safety (21.3 vs 21.2%). Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) double positivity versus negativity were predictive of higher retention in both biologic-naive (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI] 0.71 [0.53, 0.96]; P = 0.019) and biologic-failure patients (HR [95% CI] 0.76 [0.62, 0.94]; P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept initiation as earlier vs later line of therapy in RA may achieve higher 2-year retention rates. RF and anti-CCP seropositivity could predict increased abatacept retention, irrespective of treatment line. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02109666.

Ten-Year Retention Rate of Infliximab in Patients with Behçet's Disease-Related Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 10-year drug retention rate of infliximab (IFX) in Behçet's disease (BD)-related uveitis, the effect of a concomitant use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on drug survival and differences according to the lines of biologic treatment. METHODS: Cumulative survival rates were studied using the Kaplan-Meier plot, while the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to compare survival curves. RESULTS: Forty patients (70 eyes) were eligible for analysis. The drug retention rates at 12-, 24-, 60- and 120-month follow-up were 89.03%, 86.16%, 75.66% and 47.11% respectively. No differences were identified according to the use of concomitant DMARDs (p = 0.20), while a statistically significant difference was observed in relation to the different lines of IFX treatment (p = 0.014). Visual acuity improved from baseline to the last follow-up visit (p = 0.047) and a corticosteroid-sparing effect was observed (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: IFX retention rate in BD-uveitis is excellent and is not affected by concomitant DMARDs.

Long-term retention rates of adalimumab and infliximab in non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis.

The aim of the present study was to compare long-term adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) retention rates in patients with intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis. Additional aims are as follows: (i) to identify any difference in the causes of treatment discontinuation between patients treated with ADA and IFX; (ii) to assess any impact of demographic features, concomitant treatments, and different lines of biologic therapy on ADA and IFX retention rates; and (iii) to identify any correlation between ADA and IFX treatment duration and the age at uveitis onset, the age at onset of the associated systemic diseases, and the age at the start of treatment. Clinical, therapeutic, and demographic data from patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis treated with ADA or IFX were retrospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test were used to assess survival curves. One hundred eight patients (188 eyes) were enrolled; in 87 (80.6%) patients, uveitis was associated with a systemic disease. ADA and IFX were administered in 62 and 46 patients, respectively. No statistically significant differences were identified between ADA and IFX retention rates (p value = 0.22). Similarly, no differences were identified between ADA and IFX retention rates in relation to gender (p value = 0.61 for males, p value = 0.09 for females), monotherapy (p value = 0.08), combination therapy with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (log-rank p value = 0.63), and different lines of biologic therapy (p value = 0.79 for biologic-naïve patients; p value = 0.81 for subjects previously treated with other biologics). In conclusion, ADA and IFX have similar long-term retention rates in patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic features do not affect their long-term effectiveness.

Rapid and Sustained Efficacy of Golimumab in the Treatment of Multirefractory Uveitis Associated with Behçet's Disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate golimumab (GOL) efficacy in the management of Behçet's disease (BD)-related uveitis. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 5 patients (8 eyes) with at least two recent relapses of uveitis, treated with GOL at the standard dose of 50 mg every 4 weeks. RESULTS: A complete control of intraocular inflammation was observed in 7/8 eyes (87.5%) at 12-month follow-up. The number of relapses 12 months before and after GOL initiation was 11 and 1, respectively. At baseline, four eyes had active retinal vasculitis (RV). At 3-month follow-up evaluation RV resolved in all eyes. Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity was 6.93 ± 4.34 at baseline and 7.32 ± 3.87 at 12-months follow-up. CONCLUSION: We confirm GOL efficacy in reducing intraocular inflammation in BD, both in term of reduction in the number of uveitis relapses and in achieving a prompt resolution of active RV.

Tocilizumab modulates serum levels of adiponectin and chemerin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: potential cardiovascular protective role of IL-6 inhibition.

OBJECTIVES: Adipokines play an important role in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), provide a link between the disease and overweight, contributing to explain the enhanced cardiovascular (CV) risk and influence the response to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The aim of this study was to determine the possible effects of intravenous (IV) tocilizumab (TCZ), an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, on serum levels of leptin, adiponectin, resistin, visfatin, and chemerin. METHODS: Forty-four RA patients with active disease (DAS28-ESR ≥3.2) were treated with IV TCZ (8 mg/kg) once every 4 weeks for six months: 20 patients received TCZ as monotherapy and 24 in association with methotrexate (MTX). At baseline and monthly, before each infusion, body mass index, DAS28-ESR and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) were recorded. The laboratory parameters, including the adipokines serum levels were collected at baseline and after six months. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up, ESR, CRP, DAS28-ESR and HAQ resulted significantly improved in patients received TCZ as monotherapy or combined with MTX. Lipid profile showed only a significant increase of total cholesterol. A significant reduction of chemerin and an increase of adiponectin were observed in the whole population and in the subgroups of the patients analysed (TCZ mono or combined therapy) without any significant correlations with clinical and biochemical parameters. No changes in the leptin and resistin levels were detected. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ is able to regulate serum levels of chemerin and adiponectin in RA patients, independently of the disease treatment response, which contributes to explain the CV safety of TCZ.

Comparative efficacy between adalimumab and infliximab in the treatment of non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis: a retrospective observational study of 107 patients.

To compare the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) in patients with non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. Demographic, clinical, instrumental, and therapeutic data from patients enrolled were collected at the start of treatment, at 12-month follow-up, and at the last follow-up assessment. One hundred seven patients (46 females, 187 eyes) were enrolled, 66 (61.7%) treated with ADA and 41 (38.3%) with IFX. Bilateral involvement was observed in 80 cases. The mean follow-up was 26.45 ± 21.71 months for ADA patients and 56.60 ± 56.04 months for IFX patients. The overall decrease of uveitis frequency during the first 12 months of treatment was 66.7% in the IFX group and 84.2% in the ADA group, compared to the previous 12 months (p = 0.09). A significantly higher corticosteroid dosage was found among patients treated with ADA at the last follow-up visit (p = 0.008). The percentage of patients co-administered with corticosteroids was significantly higher among ADA patients both at the 12-month visit (p = 0.03) and at the last visit (p = 0.0004). The frequency of uveitic macular edema (UME) was significantly higher among patients treated with ADA compared to those treated with IFX at the 12-month assessment (p = 0.015) and at the last follow-up visit (p = 0.011); central macular thickness was significantly higher in ADA group compared to the IFX group at the last follow-up assessment (p = 0.04). ADA and IFX have shown a similar efficacy in controlling uveitis relapses, but IFX showed a more pronounced corticosteroid sparing effect and a significantly higher capacity in resolving UME compared to ADA.