Coinfección COVID-19 y tuberculosis: experiencia de una terapia intensiva durante el periodo enero 2020-junio 2022 / COVID-19 and tuberculosis co-infection: experience of an intensive care unit during the period of January-june 2022

Antecedentes: Se ha demostrado que la coinfección tu-berculosis y COVID-19 presenta peor evolución clínica. La inmunidad protectora se debilita frente a esta situación, generando fallo en el control de ambas infecciones, reac-tivación de formas latentes de tuberculosis y progresión exacerbada de los casos activos. Asimismo, la terapia con corticoides utilizada dentro del tratamiento de infecciones graves por COVID-19 puede generar inmunosupresión y precipitar la progresión de la tuberculosis.Objetivos: Describir las características clínicas, presenta-ción y evolución de los pacientes críticos con coinfección COVID-19 y tuberculosis. Evaluar la incidencia y letalidad de la asociación COVID-19 y tuberculosis en cuidados in-tensivos. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo. Se revisaron 12 historias clínicas de pacientes con coinfección COVID-19-tuberculosis sobre 1014 histo-rias clínicas de pacientes ingresados con diagnóstico de COVID-19, durante el periodo comprendido enero 2020 y junio 2022. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva. Resultados y discusión: Sobre un total de 1014 historias clínicas, se encontraron 12 pacientes con coinfección (in-cidencia de 0,011). La letalidad global en cuidados inten-sivos fue del 75%, a los 45 días fue del 83,3%, duplicando la letalidad general de los pacientes COVID-19 no coinfec-tados ingresados durante el mismo periodo (75% versus 37%). Los pacientes que requirieron ingreso a ventilación RESUMENARTÍCULO ORIGINALmecánica tuvieron una letalidad del 100% y aquellos que tenían infección por virus de inmunodeficiencia adquirida presentaron una letalidad de 100%. Resulta importante describir los hallazgos y alertar sobre la evolución desfavorable de aquellos pacientes que pre-sentan esta asociación a fin de optimizar el manejo y espe-cialmente recomendar la búsqueda de coinfección cuando el criterio clínico lo requiera

Background: Coinfection with tuberculosis and COVID-19 has been shown to have a worse clinical course. Protective immunity is weakened in this situation, leading to failure to control both infections, reactivation of latent forms of TB and exacerbated progression of active cases. Furthermore, corticosteroid therapy used in the treatment of severe COVID-19 infections can lead to immunosuppression and precipitate TB progression.Objectives: To describe the clinical characteristics, presentation and evolution of critically ill patients with COVID-19 and tuberculosis co-infection.To evaluate the incidence and lethality of COVID-19 and tuberculosis association in intensive care.Materials and methods: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted. Twelve medical records of patients aged 18 years or older admitted to intensive care with a diagnosis of COVID-19 during the period January 2020 to July 2022 were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were used.Results and discussion: Out of a total of 1014 medical records, 12 patients were found with co-infection (incidence 0.011). The global intensive care case fatality was 75%, at 45 days it was 83.3%. This was twice the overall case fatality of non-co-infected COVID-19 patients admitted during the same period (75% versus 37%). Patients requiring admission to mechanical ventilation had a 100% case fatality and those with acquired immunodeficiency virus infection had a 100% case fatality.It is important to describe the findings and to alert to the worse evolution of those patients presenting with this association, in order to improve management and recommend searching for co-infection when clinical criteria require it

Evaluation of a mucoadhesive pilocarpine tablet for the treatment of xerostomia: a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial.

The objectives of this study were to determine the effectiveness of a mucoadhesive tablet of pilocarpine, 5 mg, for the treatment of xerostomia and verify its pharmacokinetic profile. The randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial involved 25 older adults (60 to 80 years) with xerostomia and hyposalivation who were randomly divided into groups A and B. Once daily, for 7 days, group A used a mucoadhesive tablet containing pilocarpine, while group B used a mucoadhesive tablet without the active ingredient (first intervention). After 7 days of washout (no treatment), use of the medications resumed for 7 days, with a crossover between groups (second intervention). Xerostomia was evaluated through a shortened version of the Summated Xerostomia Inventory-Dutch Version, and the unstimulated salivary flow (USF) and stimulated salivary flow (SSF) of the patients were measured. The patients were evaluated at baseline and 7, 14, and 21 days. Then, the pharmacokinetic profiles of mucoadhesive and conventional oral pilocarpine tablets were compared using saliva obtained from 8 patients. Both of the interventions resulted in a significant reduction in Summated Xerostomia Inventory scores and a significant increase in the mean USF (P < 0.05). A statistically significant increase in the mean SSF only occurred when pilocarpine was administered (P < 0.05). No significant adverse effects were found. The mucoadhesive tablet resulted in much higher salivary concentrations of pilocarpine than did the conventional oral tablet. Both formulations of the mucoadhesive tablet, with or without pilocarpine, relieved patients' dry mouth symptoms. Trial registration: Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clinicos (ReBEC) No. RBR-9qdnws.