Clinicopathologic characteristics of 143 patients with synchronous bilateral invasive breast carcinomas treated in a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Synchronous bilateral invasive breast carcinoma (SBIBC) ranged in incidence from 0.3% to as high as 12%. METHODS: Between April 1997 and February 2003, 143 consecutive patients with SBIBC were treated at the European Institute of Oncology (Milan, Italy). Their information was collected prospectively in a database. The bilateral tumors were divded into left and right tumors. Tumor size, histology, grade, lymph node status, estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status, HER-2 expression, peritumoral vascular invasion (PVI), Ki-67 expression, extensive in situ component (EIC), and multifocality between the two groups were analyzed. During the same time period, 6218 patients with unilateral invasive breast carcinoma (UIBC) were analyzed in the same manner for comparison with the patients with SBIBC. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between left and right tumors, and the observed histopathologic agreement within the same patient was significantly superior than statistically expected for all characteristics except size, lymph node status, and multifocality. When compared with patients with UIBC, patients with SBIBC were more likely to present with smaller tumors and showed a higher frequency of invasive lobular carcinoma, lower histologic grade, higher rate of ER and PgR positivity, and lower PVI and Ki-67 expression. CONCLUSIONS: The high concordance of histopathologic characteristics between SBIBC within the same patient could reflect a particular hormonal environment that influenced either the initiation and development of these lesions simultaneously and independently from the single or multi-clonal origin, either a less aggressive biological behavior compared with UIBC. In particular, the strong agreement of the observed EIC in SBIBC within the same patient seemed to definitively exclude the metastatic origin of these tumors.

Pharmacological prevention of breast cancer: quo vadis?

Although tamoxifen reduces breast cancer incidence by 30-40% in at-risk subjects, its adverse events may be a limiting factor. Thus, different strategies are being pursued to improve the risk:benefit ratio of breast cancer chemoprevention intervention. Firstly, raloxifene is being compared with tamoxifen in a phase-III trial, whereas the minimal active dose of tamoxifen is being assessed in phase I-II trials. The combination of HRT and tamoxifen may also reduce the risks while retaining the benefits of either agent. Anastrozole holds promise as a preventive agent based on preliminary data on contralateral breast cancer. Another important area is the appropriate identification of women at increased risk for ER-positive breast cancer due to reproductive factors, which may maximize the therapeutic index of hormonal agents. Finally, new targets that interfere with the onset of ER-negative breast cancer are being sought since one-third of breast cancers will not be modulated by hormonal interventions.

HRT opposed to low-dose tamoxifen (HOT study): rationale and design.

The rationale for the HOT study is mainly based on the findings of the Italian Tamoxifen Prevention Study, where 5,408 healthy hysterectomized women aged 35-70 years were randomized to 20 mg/day of tamoxifen or placebo for 5 years. After 81.2 months median follow-up, 79 breast cancers occurred (34 on tamoxifen versus 45 on placebo, p=0.215). In the subgroup of 1,580 women who used estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) at some point during the study, 23 breast cancers were observed: 17 on placebo and 6 on tamoxifen (hazard ratio=0.35, 95% CI, 0.14-0.89). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (surrogate endpoint biomarkers) studies showed that a lower dose of tamoxifen (such as 5 mg/day) does not affect the drug's activity on several biomarkers of both cardiovascular and breast cancer risk. We therefore propose a multicenter placebo-controlled phase III trial in postmenopausal healthy women on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to assess whether the combination of HRT and low-dose tamoxifen retains the benefits while reducing the risks of either.