A rationale for an individualized administration frequency of epoetin beta: a pharmacological perspective.

Several studies have compared the efficacy of once-weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) epoetin treatment with two or three times weekly treatment in renal anaemia. Epoetin administration frequency has attracted a high level of attention in recent years, and numerous small-scale studies have shown comparable efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly vs more frequent administration. The results of two large-scale, randomized, controlled trials of once-weekly administration of epoetin beta became available recently. One of these studies, by Locatelli et al., was the first to be designed specifically to demonstrate therapeutic equivalence between once-weekly and three times weekly epoetin beta treatment, using rigorous statistical methods. This was a large, multicentre, randomized, parallel group, 24-week study in 173 chronic renal failure patients. Treatment regimens were considered equivalent if: (i) the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the difference between treatment groups was within +/-2% for the time-adjusted area under the haematocrit (Hct) curve (AUC); and (ii) for mean weekly epoetin beta dose, the 90% CI of the ratio of the groups was between 0.8 and 1.25. As recommended by current guidelines for statistical analysis of clinical trial data, multiple analysis populations were examined in order to demonstrate robustness of the results with regard to the population chosen for analysis. Findings from the primary analysis, the per-protocol population, were confirmed by both the intent-to-treat analysis and an exploratory analysis that examined the influence of five patients who received dose increases above the mean. In all three analyses, the 90% CIs were within the pre-specified equivalence ranges for both the difference between treatment groups for Hct AUC and the ratio of mean weekly epoetin beta dose. In conclusion, once-weekly and three times weekly s.c. epoetin beta treatment regimens are statistically equivalent in terms of maintaining stable Hct levels and dose requirements in haemodialysis patients. The agreement of the three analysis populations provides a convincing demonstration of the robustness of the results. These results confirm that a once-weekly epoetin beta regimen is an effective option for management of renal anaemia that may improve patient convenience and compliance.

[Refractory ascites in hemodialysis: treatment by paracentesis- reinjection during dialysis]. / Ascite réfractaire en hémodialyse: traitement par ponction-réinjection en cours de dialyse.

Two hemodialysis patients, one male and one female, aged 46 and 54 years, were treated with preceed respectively for refractory ascites secondary to hepatic cirrhosis and for large polycystic liver. Preceed was decided because of the rapid reappearance of effusion following repeated puncture and albumin infusion, the poor tolerance to ultrafiltration (UF) and the poor nutritional status of the patients, with severe hypoalbuminemia. Abdominal paracentesis was performed on initiation of the dialysis session. Reinjection of the ascites fluid was made into the arterial line, allowing its UF and control of its flow. The procedure was performed whenever necessary, i.e., when inter-dialysis weight gain and ascites volume were high. In both cases, improvement was quickly obtained, with less rapid and less severe reappearance of the effusion and correction of albuminemia. Dialysis sessions with UF were better tolerated. No notable side effect was observed. The first patient was treated for 2 months, when he died of an unrelated cause. The other patient was treated for 6 months and then could be transferred to a dialysis center near her home. Twenty five months after start of dialysis treatment, kidney and liver transplantation were performed in this same patient. After transplantation, reappearance of moderate ascites and oedema is attributed to e degradation of renal function, without liver dysfunction. Five weeks after transplantation, improvement of renal function and ascites regression were noted. Preceed is an effective method of treating refractory ascites in the hemodialysis patient. Compared to classical paracentesis, it has the advantage of good tolerance, patient comfort and moderate cost.