Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: real-world outcome from a tertiary cancer centre in India.

Metaplastic carcinoma (MPC) is a rare subgroup of breast tumours accounting for <5% of all invasive breast cancers. Histologically confirmed 40 MPC from January 2001 to December 2018 were identified from our electronic database: stage I 2.5% (n = 1), stage II 40% (n = 16), stage III 45% (n = 18) and stage IV 12.5% (n = 5). The mean tumour size was 6 cm, node-negative in 60%, and hormone receptor-negative in 75%. Among the 35 non-metastatic patients, 17 (48.6%) received initial neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), followed by surgery, and only 1 had a complete pathological response. At a median follow-up of 60 months, 17% (n = 6) had a recurrence. All six of them had lung metastasis. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were 64.4% and 66.3%, respectively. Age more than 46 years (p = 0.027), tumour size more than 5 cm (p = 0.037), and nodal positivity (p = 0.001) were predictors of OS. In node-positive patients, the 5-year OS in those who underwent initial surgery was 80% and after NAT was 21.4% (p = 0.069). In node-negative patients, the 5-year OS after initial surgery was 83.3% and after NAT was 90% (p = 0.380). A statistical significance could not be demonstrated due to the small number of patients. Due to chemoresistance, the concept of initial NAT in MPC of the breast is a subject to be studied in the future. Upfront surgery should be considered for operable diseases (including stage III), followed by a decision on adjuvant therapy. Optimal treatment and effective systemic therapy regimens are yet to be defined.

Forecasting factors and outcomes in hawkish inflammatory breast carcinoma - A single center data exploration.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC) is an aggressive clinical syndrome of invasive breast carcinoma. There is paucity of data regarding the outcomes in IBC. OBJECTIVES: Analyses of OS and Event-free survival (EFS) in nonmetastatic and metastatic IBC and to find prognostic factors influencing them. METHODOLOGY: In this single center, retrospective study the data of patients fulfilling the clinical criteria of IBC were retrieved from 2016 to 2021. The impact of prognostic factors on OS and EFS were analysed by log rank test (univariate analysis). The OS and EFS were depicted as Kaplan Meier survival curves. RESULTS: There were 22 patients with IBC. Median follow-up was 17 months. The median OS was significantly better in non-metastatic(M0) compared to metastatic IBC (25 months vs 6 months) with 3year OS rate of 50% vs 0% respectively. The post-menopausal status, grade 2 histology and trimodality treatment showed better outcome while N3 stage at diagnosis had worse outcome in M0 group. The lesser HR expression, lesser pCR rates, higher N3 proportion, liver metastasis and multiple metastatic site involvement contributed to the worse outcome observed in this study. CONCLUSION: The aggressive clinicopathological features of IBC in the present study resulted in less favourable outcome compared to literature review. Improved outcome with trimodality highlights the emergent need for additional targeted therapy to improve pCR and operability.

The continuing conundrum in oligometastatic breast carcinoma: A real-world data.

The optimal management in Oligometastatic (OM) breast carcinoma is not defined. OBJECTIVES: To identify the prognostic factors influencing OM and the effect of Locoregional treatment (LRT) on survival in OM. METHODOLOGY: Patients with ≤5 metastases and each with ≤ 5 cm size were defined as OM. Data of OM were extracted from the Institute Registry between 2012 and 2018. The impact of prognostic factors on survival was analysed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression. The Kaplan Meier survival curves were used to plot PFS and OS. RESULTS: There were 170 patients with OM. The median follow-up was 61 months. Median OS was 43.3 months. The median OS was 74 months in OMD vs 22.7 months in Oligorecurrent disease (ORD) with 5year OS rate of 55.3% vs 16.5% respectively. In the multivariate analyses of OMD both Ki67 ≤ 50% and hormone therapy (HT) showed significant favourable survival outcome. While premenopausal status and HT showed significant survival benefits in ORD. The worse survival outcome in ORD could be because of their aggressive biology and deficit in LRT compared to literature review. The prognostic factors were swayed by the uneven distribution of HR status, grade and Ki67. CONCLUSION: The survival of OM was influenced by OMD, Ki67 ≤ 50%, premenopausal status and HT. The lesser survival rates of OM in the long term suggest the need for curative LRT to metastatic sites and primary tumor. The potential role of HT and targeted therapy with or without LRT need to be assessed in future randomised trials.

Study of pathological complete response rate with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation with paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CTRT) is not widely practiced in breast cancers. The current study presents our experience with the use of neoadjuvant CTRT in patients with locally advanced breast cancers (LABC) treated at our center. METHODS: The study included all consecutive female patients with inoperable stage III LABC treated at Cancer Institute (W.I.A), Chennai, India, from December 2015 to September 2016. Data were collected retrospectively from the patients' case records. The impact of neoadjuvant CTRT on the pathological complete response (pCR) and survival was analyzed. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide given either before or after 4 cycles of paclitaxel. All chemotherapy cycles were given once in 3 weeks. Concurrent radiotherapy was incorporated with 2 cycles of paclitaxel. RESULTS: The study included 100 patients with a median age of 49 years, among whom 9 (9%) had IIIA disease, 73 (73%) IIIB, and 18 (18%) had IIIC disease. The hormone receptor-positive disease was observed in 36 (36%) patients, triple-negative in 24 (24%), and Her2/neu positive disease in 40 (40%) patients. All patients were operable after completing the planned neoadjuvant treatments. Ninety-one out of 100 (91%) patients underwent modified radical mastectomy whereas 9 (9%) did not consent for surgery. Among the patients who underwent MRM, 34/91 (37.7%) patients had a pCR. Moreover, pCR was observed in 12/22 (54.5%) patients with triple-negative disease, 10/34 (29.4%) patients with hormone receptor-positive disease, and 12/35 (34.2%) patients with Her2/neu positive disease (P = 0.19). Most common morbidity observed was grade 3 skin reactions. The 2-year event-free survival and overall survival for the entire cohort was 73.1% and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant CTRT is associated with a higher pCR rate than what has been reported with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Further prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.