Implementation of a Whole Food Plant Based Diet in a Food as Prevention Program in a Resource Constrained Environment.

Background: The efficacy of a Whole Food Plant-based (WFPB) diet has been shown in randomized controlled trials in diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity. However, it's effectiveness in routine clinical settings is less well documented. This study describes the implementation and outcomes of a "Food as Prevention" program run by a single clinician. Methods: Participants were referred to a "Food as Prevention" program run by a single gastroenterologist at an academic teaching center. The program included 5 physician-led discussion and small group educational sessions. Data collected included demographics, weight and biochemical measurements before and after completion of the program. Statistical analysis included paired t-test and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess differences before and after WFPB implementation. Results: A total of 17 participants (age 59 years; 59% female) with an average weight of 90.0 kg attended a median of 3 group sessions. Majority of patients had hyperlipidemia (71%) followed by hypertension (47%) and coronary artery disease (35%), fatty liver disease (35%) and diabetes mellitus (29%). Adoption of a WFPB diet led to significant decreases in weight (4.3 kg; p < 0.01), total cholesterol (0.72 mmol/L; p = 0.046), and triglycerides (0.53 mmol/L; p = 0.005) with an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (0.10 mmol/L; p = 0.01).Conclusions Implementation of the WFPB diet in this novel pilot program led to weight loss and improvement in biochemical markers of disease. Future studies are needed to implement this model on a larger scale.

The Benefit of Fentanyl in Effective Sedation and Quality of Upper Endoscopy: A Double-Blinded Randomized Trial of Fentanyl Added to Midazolam Versus Midazolam Alone for Sedation.

AIMS: Our goals were to compare the effect of adding fentanyl to midazolam in a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial and determine if fentanyl enhances sedation, increases adverse events or effects time of the procedure or discharge. METHODS: Patients 18 to 65 years scheduled for outpatient upper endoscopy were eligible for the study. Patients were randomized to receive either 100 mcg/2 mL of Fentanyl or 2 mL of placebo IV with a double-blinded protocol. All patients received 2 mg of intravenous midazolam initially. Additional midazolam could be given to achieve adequate sedation. RESULTS: There were 68 patients randomized to the Fentanyl group and 69 patients to the placebo group. The mean dose of midazolam was 4.0 mg for the Fentanyl group and 5.2 mg for placebo group (P=0.003). Both endoscopist and nurse independently rated sedation to be better in the fentanyl group (P=0001). The patient did not perceive any difference in sedation (P=0.4). Procedure time was significantly shorter in the Fentanyl group (8.5 versus 11.1 minutes, P=0.001), with no difference in the discharge time. There was significantly less retching observed in patients in the fentanyl group (P<0.001). There were no major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopists and nurses found adding fentanyl significantly improved sedation, led to a shorter procedure time, and allowed for less midazolam to be used per case. It did not affect the patient experience of sedation and was safe. Fentanyl use for routine outpatient upper endoscopy should be considered as a safe option to improve procedural sedation.NCT:01514695 (www.clinicaltrials.gov)Accepted as an abstract for the Canadian Digestive Diseases Week meeting in February 2014.

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma in an adult patient with Down syndrome.

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma is a rare solid tumour of mesenchymal origin with an incidence of 2.5 per million population. We report what is, to the best of our knowledge, the first case in the English literature of retroperitoneal liposarcoma in an adult patient with Down syndrome. The tumour was surgically resected with no use of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation. No recurrence was found at follow-up 2 months postoperatively. Clinicians should consider retroperitoneal liposarcoma in the differential diagnosis of abdominal distention in adult patients with Down syndrome.

Recommendations on chronic constipation (including constipation associated with irritable bowel syndrome) treatment.

While chronic constipation (CC) has a high prevalence in primary care, there are no existing treatment recommendations to guide health care professionals. To address this, a consensus group of 10 gastroenterologists was formed to develop treatment recommendations. Although constipation may occur as a result of organic disease, the present paper addresses only the management of primary CC or constipation associated with irritable bowel syndrome. The final consensus group was assembled and the recommendations were created following the exact process outlined by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology for the following areas: epidemiology, quality of life and threshold for treatment; definitions and diagnostic criteria; lifestyle changes; bulking agents and stool softeners; osmotic agents; prokinetics; stimulant laxatives; suppositories; enemas; other drugs; biofeedback and behavioural approaches; surgery; and probiotics. A treatment algorithm was developed by the group for CC and constipation associated with irritable bowel syndrome. Where possible, an evidence-based approach and expert opinions were used to develop the statements in areas with insufficient evidence. The nature of the underlying pathophysiology for constipation is often unclear, and it can be tricky for physicians to decide on an appropriate treatment strategy for the individual patient. The myriad of treatment options available to Canadian physicians can be confusing; thus, the main aim of the recommendations and treatment algorithm is to optimize the approach in clinical care based on available evidence.

Alternative medicine use by Canadian ambulatory gastroenterology patients: secular trend or epidemic?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and determinants of alternative medicine (AM) use in gastroenterology outpatients and those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: An 80-item questionnaire, addressing symptoms, general health, quality of life, and AM use, was administered and analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: 52.5% of 341 participants used AM in the previous year. Most commonly used were herbal medicine (45.2% of users; 95% CI 35.4-52.5%), chiropractor (40.7%; 95% Cl 31.4-48.0%), and massage therapy (22.9%; 95% CI 15.9-29.1%). Reasons prompting AM use were ineffective medical therapy (39.5%; 95% CI 30.4-46.8%), a greater sense of self-control (29.1%; 95% CI 21.2-35.7%), agreement with personal beliefs (19.5%; 95% CI 13.1-25.4%), and conventional drug adverse-effects (17.3%; 95% CI 11.2-22.9%). AM use was predicted as follows: (1) higher education (odds ratio (OR) 2.10; 95% CI 1.22-3.60), (2) comorbid medical conditions (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.08-3.00), 3) poor mental component summary score of the SF-12 health survey (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07), and (4) higher annual income (OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.001-1.36), but was not related to response to conventional medical therapy. AM practitioners had instructed 8.6% to change prescription medications. AM usage for gastrointestinal disease was greater in patients with IBD (44.6% vs 10.0%; p < 0.05), who were more likely to cite adverse drug effects as a reason for AM use (28.9 vs 14.4%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: AM was used by 52.5% of gastroenterology outpatients and its use was greater in those with a higher level of education, comorbid conditions, poorer mental health-related quality of life, and higher income. Drug-related side effects also led to increased AM use.

Use and misuse of cost-effectiveness terminology in the gastroenterology literature: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The increased popularity of economic analyses for evaluating medical interventions has given rise to concern about the rigor with which economic constructs and terminology are used. True cost-effectiveness analysis considers both the costs and outcomes of alternative interventions. A systematic review of the gastroenterology literature was undertaken to evaluate how appropriately cost-effectiveness is assessed. METHODS: A structured MEDLINE search identified all studies published in major gastroenterology journals between 1980 and 1998 that claimed in their abstracts to have assessed the cost-effectiveness of an intervention. Blinded copies of eligible studies were assessed by two independent reviewers who used standard criteria to evaluate the use of economic terminology and key economic constructs. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Studies met a "broad criterion" for appropriateness by evaluating both costs and effects and a "strict criterion" by demonstrating dominance of one strategy or considering both incremental costs and incremental effects. RESULTS: Of 110 eligible studies, 77 (70.0%) met the broad criterion and 62 (56.4%) met the strict criterion for appropriateness. This did not seem to vary with either journal impact factor or publication year. Only eight of 18 studies reporting an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio compared its value to an external standard. Few studies explicitly stated their analytic perspective, and a minority of those with time horizons longer than 1 yr had discounted future costs or effects. CONCLUSIONS: Although most studies seem to use cost-effectiveness terminology well, there remains room to improve the rigor with which economic terminology and constructs are applied.