Validity of facial skin analysis pore detection: A comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Reliable, objective measures to assess facial characteristics would aid in the assessment of many dermatological treatments. Previous work utilized an iOS application-based artificial intelligence (AI) tool compared to the "gold standard" computer-based and a physician assessment on five skin metrics (British Journal of Dermatology, 2013, 169, 474). The AI tool had superior agreement for all skin metrics except pores and subsequently underwent an algorithm update for its pore detection system. AIMS: This comparative analysis assessed the performance of the updated AI tool's pore scores across all Fitzpatrick skin phototypes to determine whether the AI tool more accurately represents a dermatologist's assessment of pores. PATIENTS/METHODS: Frontal facing photographs in uniform lighting conditions were taken of each participant. Percentile scores were generated by each of the four self-learning models of the updated AI tool. The pore percentile scores generated by the original and updated AI tool were used to rate "worse" pores among participant pairs. These ratings were compared to pore assessments performed by a "gold-standard" device and a board-certified dermatologist. RESULTS: Compared to the original pore detection tool and the computer-based program, models A and D had the highest concordance with the physician's pore assessments for Fitzpatrick skin phototypes III-IV and V-VI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The AI tool's pores detection update was successful in its ability to accurately detect pores on all Fitzpatrick skin types, improving on the performance of the AI prior to the update. Responsibly developed AI tools that can accurately and reliably detect skin metrics across diverse Fitzpatrick skin types can facilitate dermatologic evaluation, individualize treatment, and determine treatment response.

Impact of health insurance education program on health care professional students: An interventional study.

In the complex landscape of health care, the relationship between medical practice and health insurance is increasingly crucial for effective care delivery. This paper emphasises the importance of integrating health insurance education into medical training, focusing on its impact on patient outcomes, health care accessibility, and system sustainability. It posits that health care providers with a comprehensive understanding of health insurance can offer more informed, efficient care by adeptly navigating coverage complexities. The study utilised a pretest-post-test design with a yearlong health insurance education curriculum at Wake Forest University School of Medicine. Student participants from various medical programmes self-assessed their knowledge and comfort across 13 health insurance topics before and after the intervention. The curriculum included workshops and a capstone project, emphasising real-life patient insurance challenges. Results show statistically significant improvements in 13 participants' understanding of health insurance concepts, highlighting the curriculum's effectiveness. The findings advocate for the inclusion of health insurance education in medical curricula. Such knowledge is vital in systems with diverse insurance models, like the United States, where understanding insurance intricacies is key to patient care. The study's limitations, such as a small sample size and reliance on self-reported data, suggest the need for further research with more participants and objective measures. In conclusion, incorporating health insurance education into medical training is essential for preparing health care professionals to navigate insurance complexities, make informed treatment decisions, and guide patients effectively. This approach fosters well-rounded professionals capable of managing both medical and financial aspects of patient care, leading to more equitable and efficient health care delivery. Future research should explore the long-term effects of this education on clinical practice and patient outcomes, particularly its impact on health care costs and patient satisfaction.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topical non-biological therapies for psoriasis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disease that causes patients psychosocial distress. Topical therapies are utilized for mild-to-moderate disease and for more severe disease in conjunction with systemic therapies. Topical corticosteroids are a cornerstone of treatment for psoriasis, but long-term use can cause stria and cutaneous atrophy and as well as systemic side effects such as topical steroid withdrawal. Non-steroidal topical therapies tend to be safer than topical corticosteroids for long-term use. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a literature review on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of topical therapies for psoriasis. We discuss how the PK and PD characteristics of these therapies inform clinicians on efficacy and toxicity when prescribing for patients. EXPERT OPINION: Topical corticosteroids, used intermittently, are very safe and effective. Long-term, continuous use of topical corticosteroids can cause systemic side effects. Several generic and newly approved non-steroidal options are available, but no head-to-head studies compare the effectiveness of the generics (vitamin D analogs, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus) against the newer therapies (roflumilast, tapinarof). Patients often do not respond to topical therapies due to poor adherence to treatment regimens. For patients resistant to topical treatment, phototherapy or systemic therapy may be an option.