Diagnosis and management of pharyngoesophageal stenosis: A comprehensive approach to prophylactic, endoscopic, and reconstructive treatment options.

BACKGROUND: Pharyngoesophageal stenosis (PES) is a serious complication that substantially impacts functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) for up to a third of head and neck cancer patients who undergo radiotherapy. Dysphagia is often multifactorial in nature and is a devastating complication of treatment that impacts patients' QOL, general health and overall wellbeing. The authors detail the clinical presentation, risk factors, imaging characteristics, preventive measures, and multimodality treatment options for PES. METHODS: The authors present a comprehensive management algorithm for PES, including treatment by dilation, stenting, spray cryotherapy and dilation, and reconstructive treatment options utilizing different pedicled and free flaps. RESULTS: The authors advocate for a thorough assessment of the extent and degree of pharyngoesophageal involvement of PES to determine the optimal management strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The development of post treatment dysphagia requires appropriate imaging and biopsy, when indicated, to rule out the presence of persistent/recurrent cancer. Multidisciplinary management by a team of physicians well-versed in the range of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions available for PES is critical to its successful management.

Effects of jaw exercise intervention timing on outcomes following oral and oropharyngeal cancer surgery: Pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Common in head and neck cancer patients, trismus can make speech and swallowing difficult and can compromise quality of life (QOL). Jaw range of motion exercise therapy may prevent or treat trismus in surgical patients. While the importance of these exercises is well-documented, there is little literature regarding the optimal timing of exercise initiation. METHODS: A prospective pilot study investigated the effects of early vs late jaw exercise intervention on postoperative jaw opening and QOL measures, which were examined descriptively. RESULTS: Timing of exercise intervention was not found to significantly impact the measured outcomes. However, provisional, descriptive findings showed that jaw opening was significantly associated with multiple QOL measures, with greater jaw opening associated with improved QOL. For certain QOL measures, this positive association was stronger at earlier time points than at later time points. CONCLUSIONS: The exploratory findings of this pilot study support further research into possible benefits of early jaw exercise intervention.

Prospective instrumental evaluation of swallowing, tongue function, and QOL measures following transoral robotic surgery alone without adjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has been utilized to deintensify treatment. No studies have measured swallow safety and efficiency, nor assessed the functional impact of TORS alone. METHODS: This prospective cohort underwent baseline and 1-month postsurgery assessments including modified barium swallow evaluation, using the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) rating system, tongue range of motion assessment, the Performance Status Scale (PSS), and quality of life with the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). RESULTS: All DIGEST safety scores were 0 (normal) at both time points. DIGEST efficiency scores were mildly impaired in 2 of 10 patients postsurgery. PSS scores revealed all patients were on regular diets, were 100% understandable, and were eating in public at both time points. Tongue Range of Motion scores were 100 of 100 at both time points. MDADI scores were not significantly different across time points. CONCLUSIONS: Careful identification of patients can result in excellent outcomes following TORS. Future studies will examine longer follow-up of speech, swallowing, and tongue function in patients undergoing TORS surgery.

Objective and subjective hyposalivation after treatment for head and neck cancer: Long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study examined saliva weight over time and its association with diet and patient-rated swallowing, dry mouth, sticky saliva, and dysgeusia quality of life in head and neck cancer (HNCA) patients treated with surgery plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), or primary CRT. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study in an outpatient HNCA center setting. METHODS: Patients were seen pretreatment, and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 + months post-treatment. All had newly diagnosed oral, oropharynx, nasopharynx, larynx/hypopharynx cancer from 2010 to 2016 and were to undergo surgery + CRT or primary CRT. Stimulated saliva weight was assessed with the Saxon test. Diet, eating, dry mouth, and dysgeusia quality of life were assessed and correlated with saliva weight, treatment modality, and tumor site. RESULTS: Saliva weight decreased the most within the first 3 months across treatment groups, except for the surgery + CRT group, which continued to decline. Similar trends were seen by tumor site. Performance Status Scale (PSS) Normalcy of Diet and all quality-of-life scores declined following treatment. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck-35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35); Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10); M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) Composite, Global, and subdomain scores; and PSS Diet were significantly correlated with saliva weight. CONCLUSIONS: Saliva weight worsened post-treatment across groups and tumor site, with improvement by 36 + months. Saliva weight correlated with diet, eating quality of life and perception of dysgeusia across time points. Despite dose-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy, newer technologies are needed to preserve saliva production and maintain higher quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b Laryngoscope, 128:2732-2739, 2018.

Cortical activation during swallowing rehabilitation maneuvers: a functional MRI study of healthy controls.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that the central response during swallowing rehabilitation is critical and may be exploited to maximize the therapeutic benefit. We seek to provide preliminary data regarding the neural networks associated with commonly employed rehabilitation strategies to increase our understanding of the neural bases underlying these maneuvers. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Ten healthy adults (five males, five females), ranging in age from 20 to 30 years (mean age = 25 years, SD = 2.5 years) with no previous history of neurologic illness or swallowing complaint were subjected to a single-trial functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm. The experimental tasks consisted of three swallow maneuvers, dry swallow, Effortful swallow, and the Mendelsohn maneuver. RESULTS: Multiple regions including the cingulate gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, insula, pre- and postcentral gyrus, inferior parietal lobe, superior frontal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus thalamus, were detected. The Effortful swallow, when compared to the dry swallow, elicited significant differential activation in the left superior temporal gyrus, left insula, left inferior parietal lobe, bilateral medial frontal gyrus, and right anterior cingulate. The Mendelsohn maneuver, when compared to the dry swallow, elicited significant activation in the bilateral postcentral gyrus, bilateral precentral gyrus, bilateral cingulate gyrus, bilateral medial frontal gyrus, left inferior parietal lobe, left supramarginal gyrus, and right insula. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a single-trial design is sensitive to delineate a widespread neural network of activation in both hemispheres associated with rehabilitation tasks. Both the Effortful swallow and Mendelsohn maneuvers elicited significantly higher responses in regions related to swallowing, suggestive of enhanced cortical activation during these tasks.

Outcomes of primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture: a 16-year retrospective analysis.

The current study retrospectively reviewed the cases of 68 patients who had undergone total laryngectomy and tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) over a 16-year period. Fifty-one patients underwent primary TEP and 17 underwent secondary TEP. Nearly 80% of patients who received TEP at the time of laryngectomy achieved excellent voice quality perceptually. In contrast, only 50% of secondary TEP patients achieved excellent voice ratings. This difference was statistically robust (p = 0.03). Although both surgical and prosthesis-related complications occurred more frequently following primary TEP, statistically significant differences were not achieved. Neither pre- nor postoperative radiotherapy had any effect on voice restoration or complication rates. Based on these data, primary TEP may be preferable for several reasons, including a greater likelihood of successful voice restoration, a shorter duration of postoperative aphonia, and the elimination of the need for a second operation and interim tube feedings.

Voice restoration with the advantage tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the Blom-Singer indwelling Advantage tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEP) extends prosthesis life span significantly in patients with documented premature device failure due to fungal colonization. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Data were collected in a prospective manner on a total of 42 standard indwelling TEP users who exhibited early device failure, that is, between 2 weeks and 6 months, due to fungal colonization of the flap valve despite appropriate use of oral antifungal agents. There were 29 men and 13 women, whose ages ranged from 36 years 10 months to 86 years 8 months. METHODS: Baseline data were derived from the average number of days 3 previous standard indwelling prostheses functioned before leaking. An Advantage indwelling TEP was placed after the third change, oral antifungal agents stopped, and routine care implemented, that is, flush and brush the device in situ twice each day. Each participant was assigned to 1 of 3 groups. Group 1 had device failure equal to or less than 2 months (n = 12). Group 2 had device failure between 2 and 4 months (n = 19). Group 3 had device failure between 4 and 6 months (n = 11). RESULTS: Groups 1 and 2 exhibited significantly longer device life span, that is, 77 and 82 days, respectively (P < 0.01), and group 3 exhibited device life span that was longer but not significantly so, that is, 12 days (P > 0.05), after the change from standard to Advantage TEP. Individual data indicated that the majority of participants, that is, 32 of 42 (76.2%), experienced longer device life span after changing to the Advantage prosthesis. Specifically, 9 of 12 (75.0%) users in group 1, 17 of 19 (89.5%) users in group 2, and 6 of 11 (54.5%) users in group 3 exhibited longer device life span. The combination of using an Advantage TEP, discontinuing oral antifungal agents, and reducing the number of both TEP changes and clinic visits resulted in overall cost benefits for both the user and the health care system. The cost benefit for group 1 was dollar 520.00; group 2, dollar 393.00; and group 3, dollar 204.25. CONCLUSIONS: The Advantage TEP extended device life span significantly for standard indwelling device users with documented premature device failure due to fungal colonization, reduced costs associated with tracheoesophageal voice restoration rehabilitation, and enhanced user satisfaction by eliminating use of oral antifungal agents and reducing clinic visits. SIGNIFICANCE: Use of an Advantage indwelling voice prosthesis is warranted from both cost and user satisfaction perspectives when early and repeated device failure occurs as a result of fungal colonization. EBM RATING: B-3.