Single-stage transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthesis for above-knee amputations including an antibiotic-loaded hydrogel. Preliminary results of a new surgical protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with above-knee amputations (AKA) are normally treated with the traditional socket-mounted prosthesis (SMP), which is associated with a high incidence of problems. Osseointegration has been proposed as a promising option for avoiding many common SMP drawbacks. Several concerns have arisen regarding amputee osseointegration, however, mainly with respect to infection. We report on the safety of a single-stage osseointegration protocol using an antibiotic-loaded hydrogel to coat the intramedullary implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all AKA cases treated at our center between January 2019 and April 2022, in which a transcutaneous osseointegrated implant was used in a single-stage strategy, together with a rapid-resorbable hydrogel loaded with vancomycin and gentamicin. The specific protocol used, infection rate, implant osseointegration rate and implant survivorship were determined after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: Eleven osseointegration cases were included in the study, with an average of 16 years post-amputation (range: 3-35 years). After a median follow-up of 24 months (range 12-49 months) no patient had suffered any implant-related infection. Osseointegration of the implant had been achieved in all cases. The mid-term survivorship of the implant in our series was 100 % at the end of follow-up. Radiographs of all cases showed no loosening of the implant. Further, 91 % of the series patients were able to walk without restrictions after the rehabilitation process. CONCLUSIONS: The single-stage osseointegration protocol for AKA, using a rapid-resorbable hydrogel loaded with vancomycin and gentamicin, yields low rates of implant-related deep infection. This protocol consistently delivers high rates of radiological osseointegration, with no hydrogel-associated complications.

Posterior hamstring harvest improves aesthetic satisfaction and decreases sensory complications as compared to the classic anterior approach in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

PURPOSE: The use of the posterior approach for harvesting hamstring grafts has recently become popular thanks to new all-inside techniques and retrograde drills. This study aims to compare the classic anterior approach with the posterior approach in the popliteal fossa. METHODS: Retrospective comparative study of 100 consecutive cases of primary ligamentoplasty performed using ipsilateral semitendinosus autograft with at least one year of follow-up. 50 patients with anterior approach (group A) and 50 patients with posterior approach (P). Ratio men/women: 9/1. Mean age: 32 ± 13 years. Mean operative time: 64.88 ± 12.28 min. STUDY VARIABLES: Graft harvest time; intraoperative complications (semitendinous [ST] tendon cut); postoperative neurological complications (allodynia, paresthesia, pain) or hematoma in the donor area; atrophy of the operated thigh compared to the contralateral thigh, postoperative VAS score, aesthetic satisfaction and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: Graft harvest time of 9.5 min in group A versus 5.25 min in group P (p < 0.05). Sensory complications: 16% in group A versus 2% in group P (p < 0.05). Regarding the patient's evaluation of the aesthetic result of the surgery, 80% in group A and 92% in group P were very satisfied, 16% in group A and 8% in group P were satisfied and 4% in group A and no patients in group P not very satisfied (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in terms of total operative time, postoperative joint movement, atrophy of the operated thigh, postoperative VAS, or overall patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior approach to harvesting the ipsilateral hamstring graft obtained better results than the anterior approach in terms of aesthetic satisfaction of the patient, lower rate of neurological complications (allodynia, paresthesias and hypoesthesia in the anterior region of the knee and leg) and shorter hamstring harvest time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.