Standardizing nursing data extracted from electronic health records for integration into a statewide clinical data research network.

BACKGROUND: Care plans documented by nurses in electronic health records (EHR) are a rich source of data to generate knowledge and measure the impact of nursing care. Unfortunately, there is a lack of integration of these data in clinical data research networks (CDRN) data trusts, due in large part to nursing care being documented with local vocabulary, resulting in non-standardized data. The absence of high-quality nursing care plan data in data trusts limits the investigation of interdisciplinary care aimed at improving patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To map local nursing care plan terms for patients' problems and goals in the EHR of one large health system to the standardized nursing terminologies (SNTs), NANDA International (NANDA-I), and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). METHODS: We extracted local problems and goals used by nurses to document care plans from two hospitals. After removing duplicates, the terms were independently mapped to NANDA-I and NOC by five mappers. Four nurses who regularly use the local vocabulary validated the mapping. RESULTS: 83% of local problem terms were mapped to NANDA-I labels and 93% of local goal terms were mapped to NOC labels. The nurses agreed with 95% of the mapping. Local terms not mapped to labels were mapped to the domains or classes of the respective terminologies. CONCLUSION: Mapping local vocabularies used by nurses in EHRs to SNTs is a foundational step to making interoperable nursing data available for research and other secondary purposes in large data trusts. This study is the first phase of a larger project building, for the first time, a pipeline to standardize, harmonize, and integrate nursing care plan data from multiple Florida hospitals into the statewide CDRN OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Network data trust.

Conducting a representative national randomized control trial of tailored clinical decision support for nurses remotely: Methods and implications.

Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems, patient specific evidence delivered to clinicians via the electronic health record (EHR) at the right time and in the right format, has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Unfortunately, outcomes of CDS research are mixed. A potential cause lies in its testing. Many CDS are implemented in practice without sufficient testing, potentially leading to patient harm. When testing is conducted, most research has focused on "what" evidence to provide with little attention to the impact of the CDS display format (e.g., textual, graphical) on the user. In an adequately powered randomized control trial with 220 hospital based registered nurses, we will compare 4 randomly assigned CDS format groups (text, text table, text graphs, tailored to subject's graph literacy score) for effects on decision time and simulated patient outcomes. We recruit using state based professional registries, which allows access to participants from multiple institutions across the nation. We use online survey software (REDCap) for efficient study workflow including screening, informed consent documentation, pre-experiment demographic data collection including a graph literacy questionnaire used in randomization. The CDS prototype is accessed via a web app and the simulation-based experiment is conducted remotely at a subject's local computer using video-conferencing software. Also included are 6 post intervention surveys to assess cognitive workload, usability, numeracy, format preference, CDS utilization rationale, and CDS interpretation. Our methods are replicable and scalable for testing of health information technologies and have the potential to improve the safety and effectiveness of these technologies across disciplines.