Acute Kidney Injury and Its Association With Dementia and Specific Dementia Types: Findings From a Population-Based Study in Sweden.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preclinical studies suggest that acute kidney injury (AKI) results in biochemical and pathologic changes in the brain. We aimed to explore the association between experiencing AKI and subsequent risks of developing dementia. METHODS: We conducted a study involving individuals aged 65 years and older in Stockholm from 2006 to 2019, who were free from dementia diagnosis and had data on kidney function. The exposure was an episode of AKI (time varying), ascertained by issued clinical diagnoses and transient creatinine elevations according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. The outcome was all-cause dementia and specific types of dementia, ascertained by clinically confirmed cases in the Swedish registry of cognitive/dementia disorders, the presence of 2 issued dementia diagnoses in outpatient care, or initiation of specific antidementia medications. We investigated associations with dementia through Cox proportional hazard regression by AKI, severity levels of AKI, AKI recurrence, and setting (community-acquired or hospital-acquired AKI). RESULTS: We included 305,122 individuals with a median age of 75 ± 8 years (56.6% women). During a median follow-up of 12.3 (interquartile range 8.7-13.3) years, there were 79,888 individuals (26%) suffering from at least 1 episode of AKI and 47,938 incident cases (16%) of dementia. The rate of dementia cases was 37.0 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI 36.2-37.8) after developing AKI, which was approximately 2 times higher than the rate observed during the periods before AKI (17.3, 95% CI 17.2-17.5). After multivariable adjustment, developing AKI was associated with a 49% higher rate of subsequent dementia (adjusted hazard ratio hazard ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.45-1.53). This pattern was consistent across dementia types, with HRs of 1.88 (95% CI 1.53-2.32), 1.47 (1.38-1.56), and 1.31 (1.25-1.38) for dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson disease with dementia, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer dementia, respectively. Risk associations were stronger in magnitude across more severe AKIs and in hospital-acquired vs community-acquired AKI. DISCUSSION: Individuals who experienced an AKI were at increased risk of receiving a diagnosis of dementia.

COVID-19 Pandemic and Stroke Care in Patients with Dementia Compared to Other Stroke Patients.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of stroke care for patients with preexisting dementia, compared with patients who had only stroke. The secondary aim was to investigate how the quality of stroke care changed during the pandemic and post-pandemic periods compared with the pre-pandemic period in patients with preexisting dementia. DESIGN: A registry-based, nationwide cohort study in Sweden. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We included patients with a first stroke between 2019 and 2022, both with and without dementia. The study periods were defined as follows: pre-pandemic (January 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020), COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2020, to February 24, 2022), and post-COVID-19 pandemic period (February 25, 2022, to September 19, 2022). The outcomes examined were the following quality indicators of stroke care, suggested by the national guideline of stroke care in Sweden: stroke admission site, performance of swallowing assessment, reperfusion treatment, assessment for rehabilitation, and early supported discharge. METHODS: The associations were studied through group comparisons and binary logistic regressions. RESULTS: Of the 21,795 patients with strokes, 1357 had documented preexisting dementia, and 20,438 had stroke without a dementia diagnosis. Throughout all study periods, a significantly lower proportion of patients with stroke with preexisting dementia, compared with stroke-only patients, received reperfusion treatment, assessments for rehabilitation, and early supported discharge from stroke units. In the subgroup of stroke patients with preexisting dementia, no significant associations were found regarding the quality indicators of stroke care before, during, and after the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Disparities in quality of stroke care were observed between stroke patients with preexisting dementia and those with only stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there were no statistically significant differences in stroke care for patients with dementia across the pandemic.

Immigration and access to dementia diagnostics and treatment: A nationwide study in Sweden.

•Compared to Swedish-born people, foreign-born people were less likely to receive dementia diagnostic tests.•Being born in Africa or Europe was associated with lower chance of receiving cholinesterase inhibitors.•Asian-born people had higher chance of receiving cholinesterase inhibitors, but were less likely to receive memantine.•Disparities existed in dementia diagnostics and treatment between Swedish-born and foreign-born people, but were not consistent after adjusting for MMSE scores.

Statins and cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer's and mixed dementia: a longitudinal registry-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Disturbances in brain cholesterol homeostasis may be involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Lipid-lowering medications could interfere with neurodegenerative processes in AD through cholesterol metabolism or other mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between the use of lipid-lowering medications and cognitive decline over time in a cohort of patients with AD or mixed dementia with indication for lipid-lowering treatment. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study using the Swedish Registry for Cognitive/Dementia Disorders, linked with other Swedish national registries. Cognitive trajectories evaluated with mini-mental state examination (MMSE) were compared between statin users and non-users, individual statin users, groups of statins and non-statin lipid-lowering medications using mixed-effect regression models with inverse probability of drop out weighting. A dose-response analysis included statin users compared to non-users. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 15,586 patients with mean age of 79.5 years at diagnosis and a majority of women (59.2 %). A dose-response effect was demonstrated: taking one defined daily dose of statins on average was associated with 0.63 more MMSE points after 3 years compared to no use of statins (95% CI: 0.33;0.94). Simvastatin users showed 1.01 more MMSE points (95% CI: 0.06;1.97) after 3 years compared to atorvastatin users. Younger (< 79.5 years at index date) simvastatin users had 0.80 more MMSE points compared to younger atorvastatin users (95% CI: 0.05;1.55) after 3 years. Simvastatin users had 1.03 more MMSE points (95% CI: 0.26;1.80) compared to rosuvastatin users after 3 years. No differences regarding statin lipophilicity were observed. The results of sensitivity analysis restricted to incident users were not consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with AD or mixed dementia with indication for lipid-lowering medication may benefit cognitively from statin treatment; however, further research is needed to clarify the findings of sensitivity analyses.

Predisposing factors and impact of healthcare-associated infections in patients with status epilepticus / Factores predisponentes e impacto de las infecciones asociadas a los cuidados de salud en pacientes con estatus epiléptico

ABSTRACT Background: Few studies have evaluated the incidence, predisposing factors and impact of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) in relation to outcomes among patients with status epilepticus (SE). Objective: To investigate the variables associated with development of HCAIs among patients with SE and the impact of factors relating to HCAIs on mortality at three months. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis on our prospectively collected dataset, from November 2015 to January 2019. The sample included all consecutive patients diagnosed with SE who were treated at Hospital Eugenio Espejo during that period. In total, 74 patients were included. Clinical variables such as age, etiology of SE, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), hospital length of stay, refractory SE (RSE) and outcomes were analyzed. Results: HCAIs were diagnosed in 38 patients (51.4%), with a preponderance of respiratory tract infection (19; 25.7%). Prolonged hospital length of stay (OR=1.09; 95%CI 1.03-1.15) and CCI≥2 (OR=5.50; 95%CI 1.37-22.10) were shown to be independent variables relating to HCAIs. HCAIs were associated with an increased risk of mortality at three months, according to Cox regression analysis (OR=2.23; 95%CI 1.08-4.58), and with infection caused by Gram-negative microorganisms (OR=3.17; 95%CI 1.20-8.39). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated that HCAIs had a negative impact on the survival rate at three months (log rank=0.025). Conclusions: HCAIs are a common complication among Ecuadorian patients with SE and were related to a lower survival rate at three months. Prolonged hospital length of stay, RSE and CCI≥2 were associated with the risk of developing HCAIs.

RESUMEN Antecedentes: Pocos estudios han evaluado la incidencia, los factores predisponentes y el impacto de las infecciones asociadas a los cuidados de salud (IACS) en pacientes con Estatus Epiléptico (EE). Objetivo: Evaluar los factores predisponentes de IACS en pacientes con EE y su impacto evolutivo después de tres meses. Métodos: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de los datos recogidos prospectivamente en nuestra base de datos, desde noviembre de 2015 hasta enero de 2019. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes diagnosticados y consecutivamente tratados con EE, en el Hospital Eugenio Espejo, durante ese periodo. En total, 74 pacientes fueron incluidos. Se analizaron variables clínicas y evolutivas. Resultados: Las IACS fueron identificadas en 38 pacientes (51,4%), con predominio de infecciones respiratorias (25,7%). Los factores asociados con el desarrollo IACS fueron la estadía hospitalaria prolongada (OR=1,09, IC95% 1,03-1,15) y el índice de Charlson (ICH)≥2 (OR=5,50, IC95% 1,37-22,10). La regresión de Cox demostró un incremento significativo de la mortalidad en los pacientes con IACS (OR=2,23, IC95% 1,08-4,58) y en las causadas por gérmenes gram-negativos (OR=3,17, IC95% 1,20-8,39). La curva de Kaplan Meier evidenció el impacto desfavorable de las IACS (log rank=0.025) en la evolución de los pacientes después de los tres meses. Conclusiones: Las IACS fueron complicaciones frecuentes en los pacientes ecuatorianos con EE y fueron asociadas con una menor supervivencia después de los tres meses. Las variables como la estadía hospitalaria prolongada, el EE refractario y el ICH≥2 fueron identificados como factores de riesgo para sufrir una IACS.