Strategy use on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test.

Although the popularity of including figural fluency tests in cognitive and neuropsychological test batteries has increased in recent years, the spontaneous use of strategies on these measures remains poorly understood. This study addressed three questions pertaining to strategy use on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT): (i) how common is strategy use, (ii) what information does strategy use convey, and (iii) can examinees learn to use strategies. Findings revealed that nearly seven out of 10 healthy college students used a strategy at least once while taking the RFFT. The number of strategies used and the number of figures produced using a strategy had modest correlations with select executive function measures (D-KEFS Tower Test, Sorting, and Letter & Category Verbal Fluency) in hypothesized directions. When strategies were demonstrated for subjects who did not spontaneously use them, those subjects were able to subsequently use strategies. These findings suggest that although common, failure to spontaneously use a strategy is not unusual. Further, strategy use may reflect a cognitive asset, particularly regarding planning, reasoning, and cognitive flexibility.

Estimates of the validity and utility of the Conners' Continuous Performance Test in the assessment of inattentive and/or hyperactive-impulsive behaviors in children.

This study evaluated the validity and classification utility of the Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CCPT) in the assessment of inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive behaviors in children. Significant, positive correlations between the CCPT parameters and behavioral ratings of ADHD behaviors were hypothesized. In addition, it was hypothesized that the CCPT parameters would perform better than a random test (chance) and show fair to moderate utility of classification across the different indices. Participants were 104 children between 6 and 12 years of age who were referred for evaluation of attention problems. The first hypothesis was not supported. There were no significant, positive correlations between the CCPT parameters and parent and teacher ratings of inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive behaviors. The second hypothesis was only partially supported. The CCPT Overall Index and the Omission Errors (84th percentile cutoff) performed better than a random test; however, the utility of the CCPT Overall Index only ranged from poor to slight. Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed the accuracy of the CCPT to be low. The implications and limitations of this study and future research directions are discussed.

Estimates of the validity and utility of unstructured clinical observations of children in the assessment of ADHD.

The purpose of this prospective study was to examine the validity and diagnostic utility of unstructured clinic observations of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) behaviors in children. Results showed observations to be related to behavioral ratings of parents but not of teachers. The relationship between observations and parent ratings was stronger for hyperactive-impulsive than inattentive behaviors. The level of agreement between observations and classification of ADHD significantly exceeded chance levels only for parent measures of hyperactivity-impulsivity. Only parent measures predicted a diagnosis of ADHD at a rate that was significantly better than chance. Clinic observations were found to have consistently higher positive predictive power than negative predictive power. Clinical implications are discussed.