Guidelines for Opioid Prescribing in Children and Adolescents After Surgery: An Expert Panel Opinion.

Importance: Opioids are frequently prescribed to children and adolescents after surgery. Prescription opioid misuse is associated with high-risk behavior in youth. Evidence-based guidelines for opioid prescribing practices in children are lacking. Objective: To assemble a multidisciplinary team of health care experts and leaders in opioid stewardship, review current literature regarding opioid use and risks unique to pediatric populations, and develop a broad framework for evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines for children who require surgery. Evidence Review: Reviews of relevant literature were performed including all English-language articles published from January 1, 1988, to February 28, 2019, found via searches of the PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Pediatric was defined as children younger than 18 years. Animal and experimental studies, case reports, review articles, and editorials were excluded. Selected articles were graded using tools from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine 2011 levels of evidence. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was applied throughout guideline creation. Consensus was determined using a modified Delphi technique. Findings: Overall, 14 574 articles were screened for inclusion, with 217 unique articles included for qualitative synthesis. Twenty guideline statements were generated from a 2-day in-person meeting and subsequently reviewed, edited, and endorsed externally by pediatric surgical specialists, the American Pediatric Surgery Association Board of Governors, the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Surgery Executive Committee, and the American College of Surgeons Board of Regents. Review of the literature and guideline statements underscored 3 primary themes: (1) health care professionals caring for children who require surgery must recognize the risks of opioid misuse associated with prescription opioids, (2) nonopioid analgesic use should be optimized in the perioperative period, and (3) patient and family education regarding perioperative pain management and safe opioid use practices must occur both before and after surgery. Conclusions and Relevance: These are the first opioid-prescribing guidelines to address the unique needs of children who require surgery. Health care professionals caring for children and adolescents in the perioperative period should optimize pain management and minimize risks associated with opioid use by engaging patients and families in opioid stewardship efforts.

The pharmacist-physician relationship in the detection of ambulatory medication errors.

BACKGROUND: Expenditures on outpatient prescription drugs have increased enormously in the last decade. Despite this growth in expenditures, prescription medication safety in the ambulatory setting is lacking. Prior research in outpatient care has centered around the physician-patient encounter. What remains unexamined in the ambulatory care literature is the pharmacist's role as interceptor, detector, and reporter of medication errors to the physician. METHODS: Data about the role, responsibilities, and expectations to inform physicians about this subject were collected from pharmacist (N = 30) and patient (N = 31) focus groups conducted between July 2002 and July 2003. Pharmacists in outpatient practices and patients were randomly selected from the state licensure database and the Jackson Metropolitan phonebook, respectively. ANALYSIS: Grounded theory provided the perspective on which data were interpreted. Data patterns were linked using key words and phrases for theme analysis. Arbitration between coders resulted in an inter-rater reliability of 0.85. RESULTS: : Three complementary patterns were identified from the data: 1) patients likely see multiple physicians and only one pharmacist; 2) patients are more likely to report medication errors to the pharmacist than to the physician; and 3) pharmacists are the final interceptors, detecting medication errors before they reach patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory pharmacists are in a privileged position to gather data regarding adverse responses to prescribed medication or incidents of medication mishaps. The failure of pharmacists to report information back to physicians is a missed opportunity to improve patient safety.

Identifying barriers to the adoption of new technology in rural hospitals: a case report.

The purpose of this study is to identify barriers to the adoption of new technology in rural settings. Specifically, this paper focuses on identifying and overcoming barriers to the adoption of a medication error reporting system in eight rural hospitals. Prior research has generally focused on barriers to the adoption of new technology in urban areas, medical centers, or large hospitals. The literature has identified six primary barriers to the adoption of new technology: cost, legality, time, fear, usefulness, and complexity. Although our research recognizes these same barriers, the means through which these barriers may be mitigated are different in rural settings. Our research identified three additional barriers to the adoption of new technology that may be specific to rural areas: personnel, physical space, and Internet access. Our outcome variable, in order to demonstrate our success, is the number of reported medication errors.

Improving patient safety through information technology.

Health information technology (HIT) is generally accepted as the solution for the nation's medical error crisis. Although limited studies suggest the importance of using HIT in the process of medication management, research has failed to adequately describe how HIT actually works in capturing medication error data and improving patient safety within a healthcare system.1-3 The aim of our study is to identify essential elements in the adoption of technology within the broader context of system change and workflow modification. Using the adoption of an electronic reporting system to improve patient safety, we examine the role of this technology within process improvement, culture, and workflow.