Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (2): 84-89, 2024.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38344964

RESUMO

Malignant lesions of tracheal bifurcation usually lead to respiratory failure and risk of mortality. Airway stenting is the only minimally invasive method for these patients. The authors present a patient with T4N3M0 left-sided lung cancer (inoperable stage IIIc) complicated by respiratory failure due to tracheal bifurcation obstruction. Bilateral stenting by self-expanding stents with perforated coatings was effective for airway recanalization and provided subsequent chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias , Broncopatias , Insuficiência Respiratória , Estenose Traqueal , Humanos , Constrição Patológica/complicações , Estenose Traqueal/diagnóstico , Estenose Traqueal/etiologia , Estenose Traqueal/cirurgia , Broncopatias/complicações , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/complicações , Stents/efeitos adversos
2.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (1): 21-28, 2024.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258684

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) and open surgery for esophageal perforations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 60 patients with esophageal perforations between 2010 and 2022. The main group included 29 patients who underwent minimally invasive treatment with EVT, the control group - 31 patients after open surgical interventions. RESULTS: Pneumonia occurred in 21 (72%) and 14 (45%) patients (p=0.04), esophageal stenosis within the perforation zone - in 4 (13.8%) and 1 (3.2%) patient, respectively (p=0.188). Chronic esophageal fistulas were significantly more common in the control group (6 (20.7%) versus 15 (48.4%) patients, p=0.032). The overall duration of treatment (median) among survivors was significantly shorter in the main group: 33 (23; 48) versus 71.5 (59; 93.7) days (p=0.5). However, length of ICU-stay was slightly higher (11 (6; 16) versus 8.5 (5; 12.75) days, p=0.32). Mortality rate was 13.8% (n=4) and 29% (n=9), respectively (p=0.213). Minimally invasive technologies decreased the risk of fatal outcome by 10 times (OR 10.123, 95% CI 1.491-124.97, p=0.035) compared to traditional surgery. CONCLUSION: EVT in complex minimally invasive treatment of patients with mechanical esophageal injuries is an effective method significantly reducing mortality and duration of inpatient treatment compared to traditional surgical approach.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Fístula Esofágica , Perfuração Esofágica , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Humanos , Perfuração Esofágica/diagnóstico , Perfuração Esofágica/etiologia , Perfuração Esofágica/cirurgia , Endoscopia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA