Functional and oncological outcomes of salvage transoral robotic surgery: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) as a first-line therapy has been well-documented but evidence is missing regarding salvage therapy. The aim of this study is to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of TORS as a primary and salvage therapy. METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study included 74 patients operated by a single surgeon and sorted out into two groups: primary treatment (PT) or Salvage treatment (ST) in case of previous history of radiation therapy. Patients were further stratified by tumour location: larynx and pharynx (lST vs lPT and pST vs pPT). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in PT group (64.9%) and 26 in ST group (35.1%). ST patients had more frequent cTis/T1 tumours (57.7% vs 29.2%, p = 0.0164) and no clinical lymph disease (3.8% vs 37.5%, p = 0.0016). Tracheostomy was more often performed in the ST group (57.7% vs 16.7%, p = 0.0003) and the lST subgroup (88.9% vs 9.1%, p < 0.0001). Gastric feeding tube placement was more frequent in the ST group (76.9% vs 33.3%, p = 0.0003), the pST subgroup (64.7% vs 15.4%, p = 0.0009) and the lST subgroup (100% vs 54.5%, p = 0.0297). We observed a trend for more postoperative complications in the ST group (69.2% vs 47.9%, p = 0.0783). The overall survival was lower in the ST group (p = 0.0004), and in the pST subgroup (p < 0.0001). The disease-free survival rate was lower in the ST group (p = 0.0001), the pST subgroup (p = 0.0002) and the lST subgroup (p = 0.0328). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that survival and functional outcomes after salvage TORS are worse than in first line surgery.

Decisive criteria between stapedotomy and cochlear implantation in patients with far advanced otosclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the hearing outcomes in patients with far-advanced otosclerosis and to identify the best initial approach based on preoperative word recognition scores (WRS), pure tone averages (PTA), and radiological classification. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Academic neurotology tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients (n = 58) with preoperative air conduction PTA less than 85 dB (HL), disyllabic WRS less than or equal to 50% at 60 dB (HL) with well-fitted hearing aids, and evidence of otosclerosis on CT scan, treated in our department over the past 20 years. INTERVENTIONS: Stapedotomy, cochlear implantation, or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative WRS after a minimum of 12 months' follow-up, percentage of patients with WRS greater than 50%. Reliability of air and bone conduction PTAs and WRS in predicting failure of stapedotomy. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were divided into three groups: group I, primary stapedotomy (n = 32); group II, primary cochlear implantation (n = 9); and group III, secondary cochlear implantation (with a previous history of stapedotomy) (n = 25). The mean postoperative WRS were 50.6% (± 34), 75% (± 17), and 72% (± 20), respectively. Sixty percent of patients in the stapedotomy group had a postoperative WRS greater than 50% requiring no further treatment, compared to 85% for cochlear implant recipients. No specific predictive factors for stapedotomy outcome could be identified. Surgical difficulties during cochlear implantation were significantly higher in patients with advanced radiological stage. CONCLUSION: Although cochlear implantation gives better overall results, stapedotomy with hearing aids can still be very effective in the management of patients with far-advanced otosclerosis. It should therefore be proposed as a first-line treatment.