Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA for Methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 to Detect Recurrence of Stage II/Stage III Colorectal Cancer (CRC).

BACKGROUND: Most recurrences of early-stage colorectal cancer detected with current surveillance measures are widespread and incurable. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may facilitate earlier diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer and improve cancer-related outcomes. METHODS: Plasma from patients undergoing standard surveillance after definitive treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer was assayed with COLVERA and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) at a single time point. Results were correlated with radiographic imaging. Assay performance, including sensitivity and specificity for recurrence, were compared. Impact of potentially confounding variables was also explored. RESULTS: 322 patients were included in the final analysis, and 27 recurrences were documented over a median follow-up period of 15 months. Sensitivity for recurrence was 63% [confidence interval (CI), 42.4-80.6] and 48% (CI, 28.7-68.1) for COLVERA and CEA (≥5 ng/mL), respectively (P = 0.046), while specificity was 91.5% (CI, 87.7-94.4) and 96.3% (CI, 93.4-98.1), respectively (P = 0.016). Smoking and age were independent predictors of CEA but not COLVERA positivity. CONCLUSIONS: COLVERA was more sensitive but less specific than CEA in detecting recurrent colorectal cancer. Short median follow-up may have been responsible for apparent false positives in COLVERA. Studies with serial sampling and longer follow-up are needed to assess whether earlier detection of colorectal cancer recurrence translates into clinical benefit. IMPACT: This prospective study showed that COLVERA (a two-gene ctDNA assay) was more sensitive for detection of recurrence in a cohort of patients undergoing surveillance after definitive therapy for stages II and III colorectal cancer.

Validation of a Circulating Tumor-Derived DNA Blood Test for Detection of Methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 DNA.

BACKGROUND: Colvera™ is a test that detects circulating tumor-derived DNA in patients with colorectal cancer by assaying for the presence of methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 in blood. This study describes the analytical and clinical performance characteristics of the test. METHODS: Validation was performed in accordance with ISO15189 and National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council requirements. Spiked samples including 264 plasma and 120 buffer samples were randomized, divided into 8 batches of 48 samples, and processed over 8 days using 2 equipment lines (each line consisting of a QIAsymphony SP/AS, QIACube HT, and LC480); 2 reagent batches; and 2 operators to determine limit of detection, selectivity/specificity, precision, reproducibility, ruggedness, and susceptibility to commonly known interfering substances. Clinical performance was validated by assaying 222 archived plasma samples from subjects (n = 26 with cancer) enrolled in a previous prospective trial. RESULTS: The limit of detection for Colvera was 12.6 pg/mL (95% CI, 8.6-23.9 pg/mL), which equates to 2 diploid genome copies per milliliter plasma. No statistically significant difference was determined between testing days (n = 8), instrumentation, operators, or reagent batches in precision studies for the methylation-specific assays. The assay performance was unaffected by 9 commonly known interference substances, variations in bisulfite conversion, or quantitative PCR settings (cycling temperatures, incubation times, and oligonucleotide concentrations). For this clinical cohort, sensitivity and specificity estimates for Colvera were 73.1% (19 of 26; 95% CI, 52.2-88.4) and 89.3% (175 of 196; 95% CI, 84.1-93.2), respectively. CONCLUSION: Colvera is a robust test and suitable for detection of circulating tumor-derived DNA by measuring levels of methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 in human blood plasma.

A Blood Test for Methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 vs. a Fecal Immunochemical Test for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of a new blood test for colorectal cancer (CRC) to an established fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in a study population with the full range of neoplastic and non-neoplastic pathologies encountered in the colon and rectum. METHODS: Volunteers were asked to complete a FIT prior to colonoscopy. Blood was collected after bowel preparation but prior to colonoscopy, and plasma was assayed for the presence of methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 DNA using a multiplex real-time PCR assay. Sensitivity and specificity estimates for the blood test were calculated from true- and false-positive rates for neoplasia and compared with FIT at a range of fecal hemoglobin (Hb) concentration positivity thresholds. RESULTS: In total, 1,381 volunteers (median age 64 years; 49% male) completed both tests prior to colonoscopy. Estimated sensitivity of the BCAT1/IKZF1 blood test for CRC was 62% (41/66; 95% confidence interval 49-74%) with a specificity of 92% (1207/1315; 90-93%). FIT returned the same specificity at a cutoff of 60 µg Hb/g, at which its corresponding sensitivity for cancer was 64% (42/66; 51-75%). In the range of commonly used FIT cutoffs, respective cancer sensitivity and specificity estimates with FIT were: 59% (46-71%) and 93% (92-95%) at 80 µg Hb/g, and 79% (67-88%) and 81% (78-83%) at 10 µg Hb/g. Although estimated sensitivities were not significantly different between the two tests for any stage of cancer, FIT showed a significantly higher sensitivity for advanced adenoma at the lower cutoffs. Specificity of FIT, but not of the BCAT1/IKZF1 blood test, deteriorated substantially in people with overt blood in the feces. When combining FIT (cutoff 10 µg Hb/g) with the BCAT1/IKZF1 blood test, sensitivity for cancer was 89% (79-96%) at 74% (72-77%) specificity. CONCLUSIONS: A test based on detection of methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 DNA in blood has comparable sensitivity but better specificity for CRC than FIT at the commonly used positivity threshold of 10 µg Hb/g. Further evaluation of the new test relative to FIT in the population screening context is now required to fully understand the potential advantages and disadvantages of these biomarkers in screening.

Discovery and validation of molecular biomarkers for colorectal adenomas and cancer with application to blood testing.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colorectal cancer incidence and deaths are reduced by the detection and removal of early-stage, treatable neoplasia but we lack proven biomarkers sensitive for both cancer and pre-invasive adenomas. The aims of this study were to determine if adenomas and cancers exhibit characteristic patterns of biomarker expression and to explore whether a tissue-discovered (and validated) biomarker is differentially expressed in the plasma of patients with colorectal adenomas or cancer. METHODS: Candidate RNA biomarkers were identified by oligonucleotide microarray analysis of colorectal specimens (222 normal, 29 adenoma, 161 adenocarcinoma and 50 colitis) and validated in a previously untested cohort of 68 colorectal specimens using a custom-designed oligonucleotide microarray. One validated biomarker, KIAA1199, was assayed using qRT-PCR on plasma extracted RNA from 20 colonoscopy-confirmed healthy controls, 20 patients with adenoma, and 20 with cancer. RESULTS: Genome-wide analysis uncovered reproducible gene expression signatures for both adenomas and cancers compared to controls. 386/489 (79%) of the adenoma and 439/529 (83%) of the adenocarcinoma biomarkers were validated in independent tissues. We also identified genes differentially expressed in adenomas compared to cancer. KIAA1199 was selected for further analysis based on consistent up-regulation in neoplasia, previous studies and its interest as an uncharacterized gene. Plasma KIAA1199 RNA levels were significantly higher in patients with either cancer or adenoma (31/40) compared to neoplasia-free controls (6/20). CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal neoplasia exhibits characteristic patterns of gene expression. KIAA1199 is differentially expressed in neoplastic tissues and KIAA1199 transcripts are more abundant in the plasma of patients with either cancer or adenoma compared to controls.

Mutational inhibition of ligation in the hairpin ribozyme: substitutions of conserved nucleobases A9 and A10 destabilize tertiary structure and selectively promote cleavage.

The hairpin ribozyme acts as a reversible, site-specific endoribonuclease that ligates much more rapidly than it cleaves cognate substrate. While the reaction pathway for ligation is the reversal of cleavage, little is known about the atomic and electrostatic details of the two processes. Here, we report the functional consequences of molecular substitutions of A9 and A10, two highly conserved nucleobases located adjacent to the hairpin ribozyme active site, using G, C, U, 2-aminopurine, 2,6-diaminopurine, purine, and inosine. Cleavage and ligation kinetics were analyzed, tertiary folding was monitored by hydroxyl radical footprinting, and interdomain docking was studied by native gel electrophoresis. We determined that nucleobase substitutions that exhibit significant levels of interference with tertiary folding and interdomain docking have relatively large inhibitory effects on ligation rates while showing little inhibition of cleavage. Indeed, one variant, A10G, showed a fivefold enhancement of cleavage rate and no detectable ligation, and we suggest that this property may be uniquely well suited to intracellular targeted RNA cleavage applications. Results support a model in which formation of a kinetically stable tertiary structure is essential for ligation of the hairpin ribozyme, but is not necessary for cleavage.