Creating a framework for change: transitioning to value-based healthcare in Queensland.

Value-based healthcare has been described as the sustainable, equitable and transparent use of healthcare resources to achieve improved experiences and outcomes for people and communities. It is supported by all levels of government in Australia, with recent initiatives championing a shift away from traditional, clinician-centric care delivery to a more contemporary, value-based approach. To date, however, efforts in Queensland have focused on smaller scale siloed models of care and have not extended to the transformational change required to create equitable and sustainable healthcare delivery. The Queensland Health Allied Health Framework for Value-Based Health Care (the Framework) builds on contemporary frameworks with reference to the local context in Queensland and provides a structure and starting point for clinicians and managers to work together with consumers to transform services to focus on preventative health and wellbeing, shifting the focus of care to the community and sustainably improving the quality of care delivered. The Framework outlines key considerations for the design and implementation of new services, including understanding the care pathway, supporting an outcome driven workplace culture, measuring what matters and designing for outcomes. Several key lessons were learnt during the development of the Framework, including the importance of early and sustained consumer partnerships, of establishing a shared definition of value-based healthcare that enables integration across the care pathway and the need for leadership at all levels to actively support the change management process. While developed for Queensland public allied health services, the Framework is intended to be a system-wide tool relevant to all health professionals and services.

Health-related quality of life in people with different diabetes-related foot ulcer health states: A cross-sectional study of healed, non-infected, infected, hospitalised and amputated ulcer states.

AIMS: Diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFU) are a leading cause of infection, hospitalisation and amputation. However, to our knowledge no studies have compared the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with DFU that were infected, hospitalised or amputated. This study aimed to investigate and compare the HRQoL of different groups of people with healed, non-infected, infected, hospitalised, or amputated DFU. METHODS: This was a multi-centre cross-sectional study measuring the HRQoL of patients, attending one of 18 Diabetic Foot Services across Queensland, Australia, with one of five DFU health states: healed, non-infected, infected, hospitalised, amputated. HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-5L to estimate age-sex adjusted utility values. RESULTS: Of 376 included patients (mean age 63 (12) years, 75% male), age-sex adjusted HRQoL utility estimates (95% CIs) were: healed DFU 0.57 (0.51-0.64), non-infected DFU 0.55 (0.49-0.62), infected DFU 0.45 (0.36-0.55), hospitalised DFU 0.53 (0.42-0.64), and amputated DFU 0.55 (0.46-0.63). CONCLUSION: People in any DFU health state have considerably reduced HRQoL, with greatest reductions in those with infected DFU. These findings provide valuable HRQoL estimates and comparisons for several different important DFU health states, adding to our understanding of the impact of DFU on HRQoL and facilitating future economic evaluations.

Understanding the Experiences of Rural- and Remote-Living Patients Accessing Sub-Acute Care in Queensland: A Qualitative Descriptive Analysi.

Introduction: The challenges associated with equitable healthcare access are often more pronounced for individuals living in rural and remote locations, compared to those in metropolitan locations. This study examined the health care transitions of rural- and remote-living patients with on-going sub-acute needs, following acute hospital discharge. This was done with the aim of exploring these patients' experiences of client-centeredness and continuity of care, and identifying common challenges faced by rural and remote sub-acute patients accessing and transitioning to and through sub-acute care in a non-metropolitan context. Materials and Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 37 sub-acute patients. A qualitative descriptive approach was used to analyze the interview data and explore key emergent themes in relation to client-centeredness, continuity of care, and sub-acute transition challenges. Results: Interview participants' average length of stay in sub-acute care was 31.6 days (range = 8-86 days), with most transitioning from larger regional and metropolitan hospitals to on-going rural or remote sub-acute care (n = 19; 53%). Client-centeredness was primarily characterized by the quality of interpersonal experiences with staff, patient and familial involvement in care planning, and the degree to which patients felt their wishes were respected and advocated for. Continuity of care was characterized by access to and participation in rehabilitation services, and access to family and social supports. Challenges associated with sub-acute transitions were explored. Discussion: The findings suggest important implications for health care providers, including the need to implement earlier and more frequent opportunities for patient involvement throughout the sub-acute journey. The results offer a unique perspective on the way that continuity of care is experienced and conceptualized by rural and remote patients, suggesting a revision of what is required to achieve equitable care continuity for rural and remote residents receiving care far from home. Conclusion: It is pertinent for health care providers to consider the unique complexities associated with accessing on-going health care as a rural or remote Australian resident, and to develop mechanisms that support equitable access and continuity and facilitate continuity of care closer to home.

Do patients discharged from advanced practice physiotherapy-led clinics re-present to specialist medical services?

Objective The aim of the present study was to determine the rates of re-referral to specialist out-patient clinics for patients previously managed and discharged from an advanced practice physiotherapy-led service in three metropolitan hospitals. Methods A retrospective audit was undertaken of 462 patient cases with non-urgent musculoskeletal conditions discharged between 1 April 2014 and 30 March 2015 from three metropolitan hospitals. These patients had been discharged from the physiotherapy-led service without requiring specialist medical review. Rates and patterns of re-referral to specialist orthopaedic, neurosurgical, chronic pain, or rheumatology services within 12 months of discharge were investigated. Results Forty-six of the 462 patients (10.0%) who were managed by the physiotherapy-led service were re-referred to specialist medical orthopaedic, neurosurgical, chronic pain or rheumatology departments within 12 months of discharge. Only 22 of these patients (4.8%) were re-referred for the same condition as managed previously and discharged. Conclusions Ninety-five per cent of patients with non-urgent musculoskeletal conditions managed by an advanced practice physiotherapy-led service at three metropolitan hospitals did not re-present to access public specialist medical services for the same condition within 12 months of discharge. This is the first time that re-presentation rates have been reported for patients managed in advanced practice physiotherapy services and the findings support the effectiveness of these models of care in managing demand for speciality out-patient services. What is known about the topic? Advanced practice physiotherapy-led services have been implemented to address the needs of patients referred with non-urgent musculoskeletal conditions to hospital specialist out-patient services. Although this model is widely used in Australia, there has been very little information about whether patients managed in these services subsequently re-present for further specialist medical care. What does this paper add? This paper identifies that the majority (95%) of patients managed by an advanced practice physiotherapy-led service did not re-present for further medical care for the same condition within 12 months of discharge. What are the implications for practitioners? This paper supports the use of advanced practice physiotherapy-led services in the management of overburdened neurosurgical and orthopaedic specialist out-patient waiting lists.