The effect of gastric fundus radiation dose on postoperative anastomotic leakage in esophageal cancer.

Introduction: Standard-of-care treatment for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma (LAEC) includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy. A potentially catastrophic surgical complication is the development of a postoperative anastomotic leak. To date, the association with radiation dose exposure had been inconclusive. We examined the correlation between radiation exposure to the gastric fundus and risk of postoperative leakage using contemporary radiation doses and fractionation. Methods: A total of 69 consecutive patients with LAEC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy in our tertiary center were prospectively followed (median, 27 months). Neoadjuvant regimen included 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin and 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The gastric fundus was contoured and dosimetric and radiation technique parameters were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Of the total number of patients, 71% and 29% had esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors, respectively. Fourteen patients (20.3%) experienced anastomotic leaks within a median of 2 days postoperatively, 78.6% of whom had lower third esophagus or GEJ primaries. Mean and minimum fundus dose did not significantly differ between those with and those without leakage (p = 0.42, p = 0.51). Mean fundus V25, V30, and V35 doses were numerically but not statistically higher in those with anastomotic leak (p = 0.58, p = 0.39, and p = 0.30, respectively). No correlation with incidence of leakage was seen between 3D and IMRT treatment modalities. Conclusions: In our comparatively large prospectively collected series of patients treated for LAEC, radiation dose to the gastric fundus during neoadjuvant combination therapy prior to surgery did not correlate with the risk of postoperative anastomotic leak.

High Rates of Incisional Hernia After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy With Midline Extraction Site.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery aims at reducing wound complications and improving cosmetics, among other advantages. High rates of postoperative ventral hernia (POVH) are observed after laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 2011 to 2016 retrospective study of all patients at Rabin Medical Center, we examined POVH prevalence after right hemicolectomy for neoplasia and correlation to specimen extraction site. We also compared laparoscopic-assisted colectomy to hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy. Included were patients who had postoperative abdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan as part of their routine oncological follow-up to 6 months postsurgery. Patients were excluded for conversion to laparotomy, and prior abdominal surgeries after right colectomy and before follow-up computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging scan. Demographic and surgical data were collected from patient electronic records, and scans reviewed for POVH by a designated radiologist. RESULTS: Of 370 patients, 138 (mean age 70.09 y, 58 males) were included: 54 (39.1%) were diagnosed with POVH, 42/72 (58.3%) at midline extraction site, and 12/66 (18.8%) at off-midline extraction sites (P<0.0001). Surgical site infections and patients positive for tumor metastasis were associated with higher POVH rates. Most (74%) POVHs were identified within 18 months postsurgery (P<0.0001). Body mass index, age, sex, diabetes mellitus, smoking, tumor size, lymph nodes positive for metastasis, and hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy were not associated with POVH prevalence. CONCLUSION: High rates of radiologically diagnosed POVH were found after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy, with association to midline extraction site, surgical site infections, and positive tumor distant metastasis.

Association between multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitors and changes in CT appearance of submucosal fat in the gastrointestinal tract.

INTRODUCTION: Submucosal fat deposition (SMF) in the gastrointestinal tract can be seen in patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mtTKIs). We aimed to assess the association between mtTKIs treatment and appearance of SMF on computed tomography (CT). METHODS: We performed retrospective evaluation of patients who started mtTKI treatment between 2016 and 2018, with a comparison patient cohort treated with single-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors (stTKIs). SMF amount for each gastrointestinal tract segment (stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, terminal ileum, right colon, left colon) was scored as follows: 0 = none; 1 = low amount (<2 mm thick); 2 = high amount (>2 mm layer). For each CT, segment scores were aggregated to create an SMF index (SMFI). Maximal increase in SMFI between pretreatment and posttreatment CTs was documented. SMF ⩾3 was defined as positive. RESULTS: Forty patients treated with mtTKIs and 23 patients receiving stTKIs were included. Maximal increase in SMFI during treatment was 0-1 in 56/63 patients (89%) and 3-6 in 7/63 patients (11%). All patients with positive SMFI received mtTKIs compared to 0 patients treated with stTKIs (17.5% vs. 0%; p = 0.04). mtTKI treatment was associated with higher incidence of nausea/vomiting (4/7) and diarrhea (4/7) when positive SMF was noted, as compared to patients with negative SMF (6/33 patients each; p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal tract SMF deposition occurs in a considerable proportion of patients treated with mtTKIs with association to abdominal symptoms. This may be unique to mtTKIs and was not found in patients receiving stTKIs.

Ultra-low dose CT abdomen and pelvis for the detection of acute abdominal pathology in the emergency room: initial experience from an academic hospital.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to describe our initial experience using ULDCT performed in the emergency room in the evaluation of acute abdominal pathology. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients who underwent ULDCT for assessment of bowel obstruction, free intraperitoneal air, unexplained abdominal pain, or fecal loading for constipation between June 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017 was retrospectively assessed. Demographic data, radiation dose, CT findings, and clinical outcomes including performance of full dose contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), hospitalization, and surgery was collected. Concordance of ULDCT to CECT was calculated. RESULTS: ULDCT was performed in 325 patients (188 women and 137 men; mean age, 65.1 years). ULDCT detected acute abdominal pathology in 134/325 (41.2%), and in 89/134 (66.4%) it was concordant with the clinical working diagnosis. The average dose length product (DLP) was 101.6 mGy cm (range 51.7-614; median, 82.6). CECT was performed in 44/325 patients (13.5%). In 7/44 (15.9%), CECT identified discordant findings which likely impacted management. A greater proportion of patients were admitted to hospital after a positive ULDCT 99/137 (72.3%), compared to those with a negative study 81/188 (43.1%); p < 0.0001(Chi2, 27.30). Of those admitted to hospital, 11/99 (11.1%) with positive ULDCT had surgery compared to 1/81 (1.2%) with a negative ULDCT; p < 0.008 (Chi2, 6.98). CONCLUSION: With its high clinical yield and similar radiation dose, ULDCT appears as a suitable alternative to abdominal radiography for the detection of select acute abdominal pathology in the emergency room.

The Utility of Early Postoperative Neuroimaging in Elective/Semielective Craniotomy Patients: A Single-Arm Prospective Trial.

BACKGROUND: The necessity and timing of early postoperative imaging (POI) are debated in many studies. Despite the consensus that early POI does not change patient management, these examinations are routinely performed. This is the first prospective study related to POI. Our aims were to assess the necessity of early POI in asymptomatic patients and to verify accuracy of the presented algorithm. METHODS: This was an algorithm-based prospective single-center study. The algorithm addressed preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative considerations, including estimated pathology type, device placement, and postoperative neurologic change. Early computed tomography scans were obtained in all patients, but if postoperative algorithm indications did not recommend a scan, the treating team was blinded to them, and patient management was conducted based on clinical examinations alone. A neuroradiologist and study-independent neurosurgeon reviewed all the scans. RESULTS: Of 103 enrolled patients, 88 remained asymptomatic, and 15 experienced symptoms postoperatively. Pathology was present on POI in 1% of the asymptomatic patients and 53% of the symptomatic patients (P < 0.001). In the asymptomatic group, no treatment modifications were made postoperatively. Blinding of the surgical team was not removed, and 20% of the symptomatic patients returned to the operating room because of imaging and neurologic findings. The goal of <5% algorithm failure was reached with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic postoperative patients in whom early imaging is not performed for oncologic indications, device placement verification, or similar reasons, POI is unnecessary and does not change the management of these patients.