Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(8): 4986-4996, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789617

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Our analysis was designed to characterize the demographics and disparities between the diagnosis of pancreas cancer during emergency presentation (EP) and the outpatient setting (OP) and to see the impact of our institutions pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic (PMDC) on these disparities. METHODS: Institutional review board-approved retrospective review of our institutional cancer registry and PMDC databases identified patients diagnosed/treated for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 2014 and 2022. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables, and one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction was used for continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty-nine patients (31.1%) were underrepresented minorities (URM). Fifty-seven (64.0%) URMs presented during an EP versus 100 (50.8%) non-URMs (p = 0.037). Forty-one (46.1%) URMs were reviewed at PMDC versus 71 (36.0%) non-URMs (p = 0.10). No differences in clinical and pathologic stage between the cohorts (p = 0.28) were present. URMs took 22 days longer on average to receive treatment (66.5 days vs. 44.8 days, p = 0.003) in the EP cohort and 18 days longer in OP cohort (58.0 days vs. 40.5 days, p < 0.001) compared with non-URMs. Pancreatic Multidisciplinary Clinic enrollment in EP cohort eliminated the difference in time to treatment between cohorts (48.3 days vs. 37.0 days; p = 0.151). RESULTS: Underrepresented minorities were more likely to be diagnosed via EP and showed delayed times to treatment compared with non-URM counterparts. Our PMDC alleviated some of these observed disparities. Future studies are required to elucidate the specific factors that resulted in these findings and to identify solutions.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Tempo para o Tratamento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguimentos , Prognóstico , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Taxa de Sobrevida
4.
Am J Surg ; 227: 77-84, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37798150

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since 2013, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) consensus-guidelines have endorsed consideration of surgical intervention for pancreatic- neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) with liver metastases. METHODS: Patients with non-functional PNET with liver only metastases from 2010 to 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database. RESULTS: 34.7% underwent surgical intervention (13% PNET resection, 2.1% surgical management of liver metastases (SMLM), 19.5% PNET resection â€‹+ â€‹SMLM). In multivariable analysis, government insurance, year of diagnosis>2013, increasing primary tumor size were associated with lower rate of surgical intervention. Receiving treatment at an academic center (OR 3.59, 95%CI 1.81-7.11; P â€‹< â€‹0.001) or integrated cancer network (OR 3.21, 95%CI 1.57-6.54; P â€‹= â€‹0.001) was associated with a higher rate of surgical intervention. The overall rate of surgical intervention decreased from 45.7% in 2010 to 23.0% in 2019. CONCLUSION: Despite guideline recommendations and the suggested survival benefits, only one-third of patients underwent surgical intervention, potentially influenced by the rising utilization of systemic therapy in the past decade.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Hepáticas , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Pancreatectomia , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Am Surg ; 87(8): 1327-1333, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33345561

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Colonic perforation often requires emergent intervention and carries high morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine whether nonclinical factors, such as transition of care from outpatient facilities to inpatient settings, are associated with increased risk of mortality in patients who underwent emergent surgical intervention for colonic perforation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the 2006-2015 ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we identified adult patients who underwent emergent partial colectomy with primary anastomosis ± protecting ostomy or partial colectomy with ostomy with intraoperative finding of wound class III or IV for a diagnosis of perforated viscus. The outcome of interest was 30-day postoperative mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: 4705 patients met criteria, of which 841 (17.9%) died. Univariate analysis showed that patients who died after emergent surgery for perforated viscus were more likely to present from a chronic care facility (13.4% vs. 4.4%, P < .0001) and had longer time from admission to undergoing surgery (mean 4.1 vs. 2.0 days, P < .0001. Logistic regression demonstrated that septic shock vs. none (OR 3.60, P < .0001), sepsis vs. none (OR 1.57, P = .00045), transfer from chronic care facility vs. home (OR 1.87, P < .0001), and increased time from admission vs. operation (OR 1.01, P = .0055) were independently associated with increased risk of death. DISCUSSION: Transfer from a chronic care facility was independently associated with increased mortality in patients undergoing emergent surgery for perforated viscus.


Assuntos
Doenças do Colo/mortalidade , Doenças do Colo/cirurgia , Hospitalização , Perfuração Intestinal/mortalidade , Perfuração Intestinal/cirurgia , Transferência de Pacientes , Tempo para o Tratamento , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Colectomia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Instituições Residenciais , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA