Highly Sensitive Spatial Glycomics at Near-Cellular Resolution by On-Slide Derivatization and Mass Spectrometry Imaging.

Glycans on proteins and lipids play important roles in maturation and cellular interactions, contributing to a variety of biological processes. Aberrant glycosylation has been associated with various human diseases including cancer; however, elucidating the distribution and heterogeneity of glycans in complex tissue samples remains a major challenge. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is routinely used to analyze the spatial distribution of a variety of molecules including N-glycans directly from tissue surfaces. Sialic acids are nine carbon acidic sugars that often exist as the terminal sugars of glycans and are inherently difficult to analyze using MALDI-MSI due to their instability prone to in- and postsource decay. Here, we report on a rapid and robust method for stabilizing sialic acid on N-glycans in FFPE tissue sections. The established method derivatizes and identifies the spatial distribution of α2,3- and α2,6-linked sialic acids through complete methylamidation using methylamine and PyAOP ((7-azabenzotriazol-1-yloxy)tripyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate). Our in situ approach increases the glycans detected and enhances the coverage of sialylated species. Using this streamlined, sensitive, and robust workflow, we rapidly characterize and spatially localize N-glycans in human tumor tissue sections. Additionally, we demonstrate this method's applicability in imaging mammalian cell suspensions directly on slides, achieving cellular resolution with minimal sample processing and cell numbers. This workflow reveals the cellular locations of distinct N-glycan species, shedding light on the biological and clinical significance of these biomolecules in human diseases.

Treatment in patients' best interests.

A note on the current state of the law as regards balancing the autonomy, and personal values, of a mentally incapacitated patient against treatment plans with which they do not agree. The author summarises the outcomes of two medical treatment cases heard by the Court of Protection, with similar facts and different results, by way of adding to the advice to practitioners for their communications with patients and families in such situations.