Evaluation of a Role for NPY and NPY2R in the Pathogenesis of Obesity by Mutation and Copy Number Variation Analysis in Obese Children and Adolescents.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and its G protein-coupled NPY Y2 Receptor (NPY2R) are highly expressed in orexigenic NPY/Agouti-related peptide neurons within the arcuate nucleus, a major integrator of appetite control in the hypothalamus. As NPY and NPY2R are interesting candidate genes for obesity, we hypothesized that a genetic variation in these genes might be implicated in the pathogenesis of obesity. In the first part of this study, we performed a mutation analysis of the coding region of NPY and NPY2R with high-resolution melting curve analysis. For the highly conserved NPY gene, an extended population of 436 obese children and adolescents was screened, while for NPY2R, a smaller subset of 306 patients was used. A control population of 300 healthy individuals was screened for NPY2R to determine the general prevalence of the variants found among patients. Direct sequencing was performed for samples with melting patterns deviating from wild-type. In the second part of this study, Multiplex Amplicon Quantification (MAQ) analysis was performed in 308 obese children and adolescents to detect copy number variation (CNV) in the NPY2R region. Mutation analysis of the NPY gene led to the identification of one common missense variant (L7P; MAF 0.04), while the screening of the NPY2R gene resulted in the identification of one rare missense variant F87I in the patient population. In our CNV analysis, we could not identify copy number variation in the NPY2R region among obese children and adolescents. In summary, this study clearly indicates that genetic variation in NPY and NPY2R is at low frequency and thus does not make a major contribution to the obese phenotype in the general population.

DNA sequencing and copy number variation analysis of MCHR2 in a cohort of Prader Willi like (PWL) patients.

BACKGROUND: Prader Willi Syndrome (PWS) is a syndromic form of obesity caused by a chromosomal aberration on chromosome 15q11.2-q13. Patients with a comparable phenotype to PWS not carrying the 15q11.2-q13 defect are classified as Prader Willi like (PWL). In literature, PWL patients do frequently harbor deletions at 6q16, which led to the identification of the single-minded 1 (SIM1) gene as a possible cause for the presence of obesity in these patients. However, our previous work in a PWL cohort showed a rather limited involvement of SIM1 in the obesity phenotype. In this paper, we investigated the causal role of the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 2 (MCHR2) gene in PWL patients, as most of the reported 6q16 deletions also encompass this gene and it is suggested to be active in the control of feeding behavior and energy metabolism. METHODS: Copy number variation analysis of the MCHR2 genomic region followed by mutation analysis of MCHR2 was performed in a PWL cohort. RESULTS: Genome-wide microarray analysis of 109 patients with PWL did not show any gene harboring deletions on chromosome 6q16. Mutation analysis in 92 patients with PWL demonstrated three MCHR2 variants: p.T47A (c.139A>G), p.A76A (c.228T>C) and c.*16A>G. We identified a significantly higher prevalence of the c.228T>C C allele in our PWL cohort compared to previously published results and controls of the ExAC Database. CONCLUSION: Overall, our results are in line with some previously performed studies suggesting that MCHR2 is not a major contributor to human obesity and the PWL phenotype.

A Novel Domain-Specific Mutation in a Sclerosteosis Patient Suggests a Role of LRP4 as an Anchor for Sclerostin in Human Bone.

Mutations in the LRP4 gene, coding for a Wnt signaling coreceptor, have been found to cause several allelic conditions. Among these, two are characterized by a strong skeletal involvement, namely sclerosteosis and Cenani-Lenz syndrome. In this work, we evaluated the role of LRP4 in the pathophysiology of these diseases. First, we report a novel LRP4 mutation, leading to the substitution of arginine at position 1170 in glutamine, identified in a patient with sclerosteosis. This mutation is located in the central cavity of the third ß-propeller domain, which is in line with two other sclerosteosis mutations we previously described. Reporter assays demonstrate that this mutation leads to impaired sclerostin inhibition of Wnt signaling. Moreover, we compared the effect of this novel variant to mutations causing Cenani-Lenz syndrome and show that impaired membrane trafficking of the LRP4 protein is the likely mechanism underlying Cenani-Lenz syndrome. This is in contrast to sclerosteosis mutations, previously shown to impair the binding between LRP4 and sclerostin. In addition, to better understand the biology of LRP4, we investigated the circulating sclerostin levels in the serum of a patient suffering from sclerosteosis owing to a LRP4 mutation. We demonstrate that impaired sclerostin binding to the mutated LRP4 protein leads to dramatic increase in circulating sclerostin in this patient. With this study, we provide the first evidence suggesting that LRP4 is responsible for the retention of sclerostin in the bone environment in humans. These findings raise potential concerns about the utility of determining circulating sclerostin levels as a marker for other bone-related parameters. Although more studies are needed to fully understand the mechanism whereby LRP4 facilitates sclerostin action, it is clear that this protein represents a potent target for future osteoporosis therapies and an interesting alternative for the antisclerostin treatment currently under study.

Copy number variation (CNV) analysis and mutation analysis of the 6q14.1-6q16.3 genes SIM1 and MRAP2 in Prader Willi like patients.

BACKGROUND: Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), caused by a paternal defect on 15q11.2-q13, is the most common form of syndromic obesity. However, patients clinically diagnosed with PWS do not always show this defect on chromosome 15q and are therefore molecularly categorized as Prader Willi like (PWL). Deletions at 6q14.1-q16.3 encompassing MRAP2 and SIM1 were reported in some individuals with a PWL phenotype. In addition, a few mutations in SIM1 and MRAP2 were also previously identified in cohorts of obese individuals. Therefore, we decided to perform copy number variation analysis of the 6q14.1-6q16.3 region followed by mutation analysis of SIM1 and MRAP2 in a PWL cohort. METHODS: A genome-wide microarray analysis was performed in a group of 109 PWL patients. Next, we screened 94 PWL patients for mutations in SIM1 and MRAP2 using high-resolution melting curve analysis and Sanger sequencing. Additionally, 363 obese children and adolescents were screened for mutations in MRAP2. RESULTS: No gene harboring deletions were identified at the 6q14.1-q16.3 region in the 109 PWL patients. SIM1 mutation analysis resulted in the identification of one very rare nonsynonymous variant p.P352S (rs3734354). Another rare nonsynonymous variant, p.A40S, was detected in the MRAP2 gene. No variants were identified in the 363 obese individuals. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to literature reports, no gene harboring deletions were identified in the SIM1 and MRAP2 regions in our PWL cohort. Secondly, taking into account their very low minor allele frequencies in public sequencing databases and the results of in silico prediction programs, further functional analysis of p.P352S found in SIM1 and p.A40S found in MRAP2 is useful. This would provide further support for a possible role of SIM1 and MRAP2 in the pathogenesis of the PWL phenotype albeit in a limited number of patients.