Sublingual immunotherapy in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review using the GRADE system.

Controversy exists regarding the role of allergen immunotherapy as a therapeutic intervention for patients with atopic dermatitis and aeroallergen sensitivity. Our aim was to critically appraise the evidence supporting the use of sublingual immunotherapy for patients with atopic dermatitis and aeroallergen sensitivity. We performed a literature search using the terms "sublingual immunotherapy" and "atopic dermatitis" and "sublingual immunotherapy" and "eczema." We used the same terms to search PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus. Our limits were "Humans" and "English." We excluded articles that were not in English. These articles were analyzed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Many studies reported improvement in clinical symptoms of atopic dermatitis. Serious methodological shortcomings were noted including but not limited to lack of control group, lack of randomization, incomplete descriptions of randomization and/or allocation concealment, many enrolled subjects not completing participation, and/or data analysis not by intention to treat.

Modified oral metronidazole desensitization protocol.

The Center for Disease Control guidelines recommend desensitization to metronidazole in patients with trichomoniasis and hypersensitivity to metronidazole. There is only one published oral metronidazole desensitization protocol. The purpose of this study was to design a new, more gradual oral desensitization protocol to decrease systemic reactions that may occur when using the previously published protocol. We present two patients with presumed IgE-mediated allergy to metronidazole who underwent oral desensitization using our modified protocol. Case 1 was a 65-year-old woman with trichomoniasis who presented for metronidazole desensitization with a history of intraoperative anaphylaxis and positive skin tests to metronidazole. The patient tolerated six doses of the modified desensitization but developed systemic symptoms of nasal congestion and diffuse pruritus after the 25- and 100-mg doses. Both reactions were treated with intravenous (i.v.) antihistamines. Because of gastrointestinal irritation, the desensitization was completed at a dose of 250 mg orally every 6 hours. Case 2 was a 42-year-old woman with trichomoniasis and a history of hives immediately after administration of i.v. metronidazole who presented for desensitization. The patient had negative skin-prick and intradermal testing to metronidazole. She developed lip tingling and pruritus on her arms 15 minutes after the 10-mg dose. Fexofenadine at 180 mg was given orally and symptoms resolved. She tolerated the rest of the protocol without reaction and received a total dose of 2 g of metronidazole. Our oral metronidazole desensitization for presumed IgE-mediated reactions offers a second option for physicians wishing to use a more gradual escalation in dose.

Specific immunotherapy in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review using the GRADE system.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the potential role of specific immunotherapy (SIT) as a therapeutic intervention for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and aeroallergen sensitivity. OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise the evidence supporting the use of SIT for patients with AD and aeroallergen sensitivity. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the terms immunotherapy plus atopic dermatitis and immunotherapy plus eczema. The same terms were used to search PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus. The limits were humans, English, and randomized controlled trial. Articles that were not in English or were observational in nature were excluded. These double-blinded randomized controlled trials were analyzed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: Seven articles fulfilled the inclusion characteristics; 1 involved sublingual SIT. All studies reported improvement in clinical symptoms of AD; however, studies differed in which type of patient (ie, with mild vs severe AD) benefited most from immunotherapy. Serious methodologic shortcomings were noted, including, but not limited to, many enrolled patients not completing participation; small study; and incomplete descriptions of randomization, blinding, allocation concealment, and/or data analysis not by intention to treat. CONCLUSION: In a systematic review using the GRADE system, the strength of recommendation is weak for use of SIT in patients with AD. High-quality evidence from methodologically sound double-blinded randomized controlled trials is needed to support administration of SIT for patients with AD.