Effect of late prophylaxis in hemophilia on joint status: a randomized trial.

Essentials High-quality data are lacking on use of prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia and arthropathy. SPINART was a 3-year randomized clinical trial of late/tertiary prophylaxis vs on-demand therapy. Prophylaxis improved function, quality of life, activity and pain but not joint structure by MRI. Prophylaxis improves function but must start before joint bleeding onset to prevent arthropathy. SUMMARY: Background Limited data exist on the impact of prophylaxis on adults with severe hemophilia A and pre-existing joint disease. Objectives To describe 3-year bleeding, joint health and structure, health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and other outcomes from the open-label, randomized, multinational SPINART study. Patients/Methods Males aged 12-50 years with severe hemophilia A, ≥ 150 factor VIII exposure days, no inhibitors and no prophylaxis for > 12 consecutive months in the past 5 years were randomized to sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII prophylaxis or on-demand therapy (OD). Data collected included total and joint bleeding events (BEs), joint structure (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), joint health (Colorado Adult Joint Assessment Scale [CAJAS]), HRQoL, pain, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), activity, and treatment satisfaction. Results Following 3 years of prophylaxis, adults maintained excellent adherence, with a 94% reduction in BEs despite severe pre-existing arthropathy; 35.7% and 76.2% of prophylaxis participants were bleed-free or had fewer than two BEs per year, respectively. As compared with OD, prophylaxis was associated with improved CAJAS scores (least squares [LS] mean, - 0.31 [n = 42] versus + 0.63 [n = 42]) and HAEMO-QoL-A scores (LS mean, + 3.98 [n = 41] versus - 6.00 [n = 42]), less chronic pain (50% decrease), and approximately two-fold less HRU; activity, Euro QoL-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) scores and satisfaction scores also favored prophylaxis. However, MRI score changes were not different for prophylaxis versus OD (LS mean, + 0.79 [n = 41] versus + 0.96 [n = 38]). Conclusions Over a period of 3 years, prophylaxis versus OD in adults with severe hemophilia A and arthropathy led to decreased bleeding, pain, and HRU, better joint health, activity, satisfaction, and HRQoL, but no reduction in structural arthropathy progression, suggesting that pre-existing joint arthropathy may be irreversible.

PK-guided personalized prophylaxis with Nuwiq® (human-cl rhFVIII) in adults with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Nuwiq® (human-cl rhFVIII) is a 4th generation recombinant human FVIII, without chemical modification or protein fusion, produced in a human cell-line. AIMS/METHODS: This study (NuPreviq) was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, phase IIIb study of the efficacy and safety of personalized prophylaxis with Nuwiq® in 66 previously treated adults with severe haemophilia A. NuPreviq had three phases: (i) a 72-h pharmacokinetic (PK) phase; (ii) a 1-3 month standard prophylaxis phase; and (iii) a 6-month personalized prophylaxis phase. The personalized prophylaxis regimen was based on individual PK modelling for each patient according to whether their PK profile most closely fitted a two- or one-compartment model (NuPreviq approach). In cases of uncertainty, a noncompartment model was applied. RESULTS: The median dosing interval during personalized prophylaxis was 3.5 days, with 57% of patients on ≤2 weekly dosing. Mean annualized bleeding rates during personalized prophylaxis were 1.45 (median [interquartile range, IQR]: 0 [0, 1.9]) for all bleeds, 0.79 (median [IQR]: 0 [0, 0]) for spontaneous bleeds, and 0.91 (median [IQR]: 0 [0, 0]) for joint bleeds. During personalized prophylaxis, 83.1% of patients were spontaneous bleed-free. Compared with standard prophylaxis, median weekly prophylaxis dose was reduced by 7.2% from 100.0 to 92.8 IU kg-1 during the last 2 months of personalized prophylaxis. There were no FVIII inhibitors or treatment-related serious or severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: PK-guided personalized prophylaxis with Nuwiq® provided bleeding protection and enabled the dosing interval to be extended to twice weekly or less in many patients and an overall dose reduction.

Head-to-head comparison of the pharmacokinetic profiles of a high-purity factor IX concentrate (AlphaNine®) and a recombinant factor IX (BeneFIX®) in patients with severe haemophilia B.

Head-on comparative studies of factor IX (FIX) concentrates performed under standardized conditions are rarely conducted regardless of being a valuable instrument guiding health care providers towards better informed and cost-effective decisions. This study is an extension of a multicentre study that assessed the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AlphaNine(®) in 25 previously treated patients with severe haemophilia B (FIX:C ≤ 2%). After a washout period ≥ 7 days following the last PK performed with AlphaNine(®) after a dose of 65-75 IU kg(-1) , an identical PK study was performed with BeneFIX(®) on 22 of the same patients. Venous blood samples for analysis were taken at baseline and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9, 24, 48, 72 and 74 h post infusion. The outcomes of the comparison of the PK parameters were as follows: Mean (± SD) in vivo recovery (IVR) was 1.3 ± 0.4 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) for AlphaNine(®) and 1.0 ± 0.3 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) for BeneFIX(®) (P < 0.01). Mean terminal half-life, mean residence time, area under the curve, clearance and volume of distribution of BeneFIX(®) were 36.0 ± 12.8 h, 39.3 ± 13.9 h, 1631 ± 467 IU h dL(-1) , 0.046 ± 0.01 dL kg(-1) min(-1) and 1.75 ± 0.52 mL kg(-1) respectively. These values were not significantly different to those observed in AlphaNine(®), although BeneFIX(®) displayed higher than expected IVR values and lower than expected clearance values. In conclusion, AlphaNine(®) showed a comparable half-life, but an IVR significantly higher than that of BeneFIX(®). This dissimilarity may have implications on dosing requirements for on-demand treatment regimes affecting optimal resource allocation.

Randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII in adults with severe hemophilia A (SPINART).

BACKGROUND: The benefits of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with factor VIII products have not been evaluated in controlled clinical trials in older patients with hemophilia A. OBJECTIVES: To report results from a preplanned analysis of data from the first year of the 3-year SPINART study, which compares routine prophylaxis with on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS). PATIENTS/METHODS: SPINART is an open-label, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multinational trial. Males aged 12-50 years with severe hemophilia A, ≥ 150 days of exposure to FVIII, no FVIII inhibitors, no prophylaxis for > 12 consecutive months in the past 5 years and 6-24 bleeding episodes in the preceding 6 months were randomized 1 : 1 to rFVIII-FS prophylaxis (25 IU kg(-1) , three times weekly) or on-demand treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint, number of total bleeding episodes in the intent-to-treat population, was analyzed after the last patient had completed 1 year of follow-up. A negative binomial model was used for the primary endpoint analysis; analysis of variance was used for confirmatory analysis of annualized bleeding rates. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled and analyzed (n = 42 per group; mean age, 30.6 years; median treatment duration, 1.7 years). The median number of total bleeding episodes and total bleeding episodes per year were significantly lower with prophylaxis than with on-demand treatment (total, 0 vs. 54.5; total per year, 0 vs. 27.9; both P < 0.0001). No treatment-related adverse events occurred, and no patients developed FVIII inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Routine prophylaxis with rFVIII-FS leads to a significant reduction in bleeding as compared with on-demand treatment. Adverse events were consistent with the established rFVIII-FS safety profile.

A clinical study assessing the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of AlphaNine(®) , a high-purity factor IX concentrate, in patients with severe haemophilia B.

Effective treatment with factor IX (FIX) requires a thorough consideration of the properties of the concentrate to be used as replacement therapy, to date, the only available treatment for haemophilia B. The aim of the study was to determine the pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety in routine clinical use of AlphaNine(®) , a high-purity human FIX concentrate. This open, single-arm, multicentre, non-randomized trial included 25 subjects (age ≥ 12) with moderate/severe haemophilia B. Pharmacokinetics was assessed at baseline and after a 6-month follow-up. The degree of haemostasis control achieved was evaluated during a 12-month follow-up. Safety was evaluated in terms of tolerance, thrombogenicity, immunogenicity and viral safety. Mean recovery was 1.01 ± 0.19 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) at baseline and 1.23 ± 0.34 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) 6 months later. Terminal half-life was 34.5 ± 6.2 h and 33.7 ± 5.4 h, respectively. Ratios of each parameter between the two pharmacokinetic studies were all close to 1. A total of 1,576,890 IU AlphaNine(®) were administered in 889 infusions (mean dose per infusion: 1774 IU; 3.2 infusions per month per patient). The main reasons for infusion were mild/moderate bleeding (62.3%) and prophylaxis (20.5% continuous, 15.6% intermittent). Overall, 93.0% of the efficacy assessments were rated as excellent/good and 88.8% of bleedings resolved after the first infusion. Twenty-one adverse events were reported in eight patients, none of which was considered related to the study medication. AlphaNine(®) showed a pharmacokinetic profile in agreement with that of other plasma-derived FIX concentrates and provides safe and clinically effective substitution therapy for patients with haemophilia B.

An open clinical study assessing the efficacy and safety of Factor IX Grifols, a high-purity Factor IX concentrate, in patients with severe haemophilia B.

SUMMARY: Factor IX Grifols is a new high-purity plasma-derived FIX concentrate with two specific pathogen elimination steps. Until this study was performed, there were no detailed reports with an adequate number of patients on the clinical evaluation of this product. To determine the efficacy and safety of Factor IX Grifols for replacement therapy in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia B, this open, multicentre and non-randomized study included 25 male subjects over the age of 12 with severe haemophilia B. Patients underwent prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes with Factor IX Grifols for 1 year. The clinical efficacy and safety of this product were assessed. Forty percent of the patients were children and adolescents (12-17 years old). During the 12 months follow-up, 1 446 000 IU of Factor IX Grifols were administered in 961 infusions (range 12-83 infusions per patient): 31% for prophylaxis and 69% for bleeding episodes. Only five major bleeding events were reported in two patients. These haemorrhages were successfully treated with a mean of 2900 IU per bleed (range 1500-4000 IU), and 1-3 infusions per bleed. The average time elapsed from the first infusion to resolution of bleeding was 43 h (median). Overall, haemostasis was rated as excellent or good by the investigator in 96% of the infusions. No product-related adverse events were reported. Factor IX Grifols is an effective and safe Factor IX concentrate and can be considered as a first line option for replacement therapy in haemophilia B patients.

Pharmacokinetic study of a high-purity factor IX concentrate (Factor IX Grifols) with a 6-month follow up in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia B.

Optimal replacement treatment in haemophilia B patients requires a good understanding of the pharmacokinetics of factor IX (FIX). The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of Factor IX Grífols, a highly purified human FIX concentrate with two specific pathogen inactivation/removal steps, to that of available FIX preparations. The study was an open, non-randomized trial including 25 male subjects older than 12 years of age with severe haemophilia B. Pharmacokinetic profile of the FIX preparation regularly used by the subjects was determined as control. Pharmacokinetic profile of Factor IX Grifols was determined twice, one 7-15 days after control assessment and second after a 6 months period had elapsed. Results showed that all products had peak plasma levels of FIX:C within 30 min. Mean recovery was 1.3 +/- 0.3 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) for Factor IX Grifols and 1.0 +/- 0.3 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) for control products (P < 0.001). The mean terminal half-life (t(1/2)) for Factor IX Grifols was 26.7 h and 26.8 h for control product. Pharmacokinetic parameters after 6 months of treatment with Factor IX Grifols did not statistically differ from the parameters obtained with the first infusion. There were no adverse events related to Factor IX Grifols for the duration of the study. In conclusion, Factor IX Grifols has adequated pharmacokinetic properties comparable to the control plasma-derived FIX and these parameters remain stable after 6 months of treatment. Factor IX Grifols can be an effective and safe plasma-derived FIX concentrate for replacement therapy in haemophilia B patients.

Prognostic significance of hepatocyte growth factor and microvessel bone marrow density in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were: (1) to perform a complex angiogenic assessment in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients using multiple parameters: bone marrow microvessel density (MVD), bone marrow immunohistochemical cellular expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor KDR, as well as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its receptor MET, and the plasma VEGF and HGF; and (2) to determine the clinical significance of these factors for patients with CML. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The VEGF and HGF plasma levels were analysed by ELISA in 38 newly diagnosed CML patients. Immunohistochemical methods were used to visualize the MVD as well as the cellular VEGF/KDR and HGF/MET expression. RESULTS: We found an increased MVD, cellular VEGF/KDR and HGF/MET expression and elevated plasma VEGF and HGF in CML patients. The plasma HGF, cellular HGF and MET expression correlated with the CML phase. The plasma HGF correlated with all markers reflecting the tumour burden (leucocytes, blast percentage, splenomegaly and LDH) as well as with the phase of CML and overall survival of the patients. Cox regression analysis determined the prognostic relevance of HGF and MVD parameters, but not for the plasma VEGF and cellular VEGF and KDR. CONCLUSIONS: Using a complex angiogenic assessment we determined an increased angiogenesis in CML patients. No prognostic relevance was found for VEGF plasma levels or VEGF/KDR cellular bone marrow expression. The increased cellular HGF and MET expressions could be considered high-risk factors for these patients. Plasma HGF and MVD were shown to be independent prognostic parameters for patients' survival.

[Liver involvement in patients with malignant lymphomas]. / Chernodrobni uvrezhdaniia pri bolni s maligneni limfomi.

The clinical and histomorphologic characteristics of the liver lesions in patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas were analyzed. The pathogenic importance of the specific lymphoma infiltration of the liver, the toxic drug and viral action is discussed. Rare cases of a combination of lymphoma metaplasia with cancers in other organs and jaundice are discussed.