Canadian evidence-based guideline for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (cll) is the most common adult leukemia in North America. In Canada, no unified national guideline exists for the front-line treatment of cll; provincial guidelines vary and are largely based on funding. A group of clinical experts from across Canada developed a national evidence-based treatment guideline to provide health care professionals with clear guidance on the first-line management of cll. Consensus recommendations based on available evidence are presented for the first-line treatment of cll.

Observation as the initial management strategy in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) follow a heterogeneous clinical course. While they generally require treatment initiation shortly after diagnosis, it is unclear whether deferring treatment in selected patients with an indolent clinical behavior affects their overall outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this population-based study, all patients diagnosed with MCL during 1998-2014 were identified in the British Columbia Cancer Agency Lymphoid Cancer Database. The associations between clinico-pathologic characteristics, including the expression of Ki67, SOX11, and TP53, and time to treatment (TtT) and OS were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 440 patients with MCL were evaluated: 365 (83%) received early treatment and 75 (17%) were observed ≥3 months. In the observation group, 54 (72%) patients had a nodal presentation, 16 (21%) a non-nodal presentation, and 5 (7%) had only gastrointestinal involvement. Characteristics associated with deferred treatment included good performance status, no B symptoms, low LDH, non-bulky disease, non-blastoid morphology, and lower Ki67 values. The median TtT in the observation group was 35 months (range 5-79), and 60 (80%) patients were observed beyond 12 months. The median OS was significantly longer in the observation group than in the early treatment group (72 versus 52.5 months, respectively, P = 0.041). In multivariable analysis, treatment decision was not associated with OS [HR 0.804 (95% CI 0.529-1.221), P = 0.306]. CONCLUSIONS: A subgroup of patients with MCL may be safely observed from diagnosis without negatively impacting their outcomes, including patients with non-nodal presentation as well as asymptomatic patients with low burden nodal presentation and a low proliferative rate.

Chemoresistance can be overcome with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: High-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) is the preferred treatment of chemosensitive relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The role for HDT/ASCT in chemoresistant HL is less well defined. We evaluated long-term outcomes of relapsed/refractory HL patients whose disease was refractory to secondary chemotherapy preceding HDT/ASCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All HL patients who underwent HDT/ASCT in British Columbia for primary progression (PP, defined as progression within 3 months of initial therapy completion) or first relapse (REL1) were reviewed. Patients were grouped based on response to secondary chemotherapy as sensitive (S), resistant (R), and untested/unknown (U). RESULTS: A total of 256 patients underwent HDT/ASCT for PP (35%) or REL1 (65%) between 1985 and 2011. At median follow-up of 11.7 years, 58% were alive without HL, 36% relapsed; 6% died of transplant-related mortality, 3% secondary malignancies, and 3% unrelated causes. For PP/S, PP/R, and PP/U groups, 10-year FFS were 47%, 31%, and 38%; 10-year OS were 52%, 29%, and 37%, respectively. For REL1/S, REL1/R, and REL1/U groups, 10-year FFS were 64%, 51%, and 81%; 10-year OS were 71%, 59%, and 79%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, resistance to secondary chemotherapy predicted for post-transplant mortality in the PP (P = 0.04) but not REL1 (P = 0.16) groups. CONCLUSION: In this large uniformly treated cohort of HL patients with long-term follow-up, chemoresistance preceding HDT/ASCT was identified as a poor prognostic factor; however, this factor can be partially overcome by HDT/ASCT, resulting in cure in 30%-50% of patients. HDT/ASCT should therefore be considered in all transplant eligible patients, regardless of responsiveness to salvage chemotherapy.