RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend shared decision making (SDM) for cancer screening decisions. SDM requires providers to ensure that patients are informed about screening issues and to support decisions that are concordant with patient values. We evaluated decision-quality factors for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening decisions. METHODS: We conducted a national, population-based Internet survey of adults aged 40+ to characterize perceptions about about cancer screening, the importance of information sources, cancer screening knowledge, values and preferences for screening, and the most influential drivers of decisions. RESULTS: Among 1452 participants who completed the survey, the mean age was 60, and 94% were insured. Most participants reported feeling well informed about cancer screening, though only 21% reported feeling extremely well informed. Most participants correctly answered about 50% of the knowledge questions, with the majority markedly overestimating lifetime risk of cancer diagnoses and mortality. Participants rated health care providers as the most important source of information. CONCLUSION: Although respondents considered themselves well informed about cancer they performed poorly on knowledge questions. This discordance suggests the potential for poor-quality decision making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To improve the quality of decision making, providers need training to utilize decision support tools and time to carry out SDM.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Internet , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Participação do Paciente , Adulto , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing remains controversial, with most guidelines recommending shared decision making. This study describes men's PSA screening preferences before and after viewing a decision aid and relates these preferences to subsequent clinician visit content. METHODS: Men were recruited from two health systems in 2009-2013. Participants answered a questionnaire before and after decision aid viewing addressing PSA screening preferences and five basic knowledge questions. At one health system, participants also answered a survey after a subsequent clinician visit. Data were analyzed in 2014. RESULTS: One thousand forty-one predominantly white, well-educated men responded to the pre- and post-viewing questionnaire (25% and 29% response rates at the two sites). After viewing, the proportion of patients leaning away from PSA screening increased significantly (p<0.001), with 386 (38%) leaning toward PSA screening versus 436 (43%) before viewing; 174 (17%) unsure versus 319 (32%) before; and 448 (44%) leaning away versus 253 (25%) before. Higher knowledge scores were associated with being more likely to lean against screening and less likely to be unsure (p<0.001). Among 278 men who also completed a questionnaire after a subsequent clinician visit, participants who planned to discuss PSA screening with their clinicians were significantly more likely to report such discussions than participants who did not (148/217 [68%] vs 16/46 [35%], respectively [p<0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: A decision aid reduces men's interest in PSA screening, particularly among the initially unsure. Men who plan to discuss PSA screening with their clinician after a decision aid are more likely to do so.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Programas de Rastreamento/psicologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Preferência do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe decision process and quality for common cancer screening and medication decisions by age group. METHODS: We included 2941 respondents to a national Internet survey who made at least one decision about colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer screening, blood pressure or cholesterol medications. Respondents were queried about decision processes. RESULTS: Across the five decisions considered, decision process scores were similar (and generally low) across age groups for medication and cancer screening, indicating that all groups had poor involvement in medical decision making. Overall knowledge scores were low across age groups, with elderly (75+) having slightly higher knowledge about medications vs. younger respondents. Elderly respondents reported similar goals and concerns when making decisions, though placed greater importance of having peace of mind from a normal result for cancer screening vs. younger respondents. CONCLUSION: Across age groups, respondents reported poor decision processes about common medications and cancer screening, despite little evidence of benefit for some interventions (cancer screening, cholesterol lowering medicines in low risk elderly) and possibility of harm in the elderly. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Particular care should be taken to help patients understand both benefit and risk of screening tests and routine medications.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Programas de Rastreamento , Adesão à Medicação , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Médico-Paciente , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinicians are encouraged to support patients in achieving shared decision making (SDM) for cancer screening. PURPOSE: To describe decision making processes and outcomes for cancer screening discussions. METHODS: A 2011 national Internet survey of adults aged ≥50 years who made cancer screening decisions (breast, BrCa; colorectal, CRC; prostate, PCa) within the previous 2 years was conducted. Participants were asked about their perceived cancer risk; how informed they felt about cancer tests; whether their healthcare provider addressed pros/cons of testing, presented the option of no testing, and elicited their input; whether they were tested; and their confidence in the screening decision. Data were analyzed in 2013-2014 with descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 1,134 participants (477 men, 657 women) aged ≥50 years made cancer screening decisions, and 1,098 (354, BrCa; 598, CRC; 146, PCa) decisions were discussed with a healthcare provider. Most discussions (51%-67%) addressed pros of screening some or a lot, but few (7%-14%) similarly addressed cons. For all cancer screening decisions, providers usually (63%-71%) explained that testing was optional, but less often asked women (43%-57%) than men (70%-71%) whether they wanted testing. Only 27%-38% of participants reported SDM, 69%-93% underwent screening, and 55%-76% would definitely make the same decision again. Perceived high/average cancer risk and feeling highly informed were associated with confidence in the screening decision. CONCLUSIONS: Discussions often failed to provide balanced information and meet SDM criteria. Supporting SDM could potentially improve the quality of cancer screening decisions.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Tomada de Decisões , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Internet , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Risco , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Informing and involving patients in their medical decisions is increasingly becoming a standard for good medical care, particularly for primary care physicians. OBJECTIVE: To learn how patients describe the decision-making process for 10 common medical decisions, including 6 that are most often made in primary care. DESIGN: A survey of a national sample of adults 40 years or older who in the preceding 2 years had either experienced or discussed with a health care provider 1 or more of 10 decisions: medication for hypertension, elevated cholesterol, or depression; screening for breast, prostate, or colon cancer; knee or hip replacement for osteoarthritis, or surgery for cataract or low back pain. SETTING: Adults living in households in the United States in 2011. PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of adults drawn from a probability sample-based web panel developed by Knowledge Networks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients' perceptions of the extent to which the pros and cons were discussed with their health care providers, whether the patients were told they had a choice, and whether the patients were asked for their input. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 2718 patients, with a response rate of 58.3%. Respondents reported much more discussion of the pros than the cons of all tests or treatments; discussions about the surgical procedures tended to be more balanced than those about medications to reduce cardiac risks and cancer screening. Most patients (60%-78%) said they were asked for input for all but 3 decisions: medications for hypertension and elevated cholesterol and having mammograms (37.3%-42.7%). Overall, the reported decision-making processes were most patient centered for back or knee replacement surgery and least for breast and prostate cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Discussions about these common tests, medications, and procedures as reported by patients do not reflect a high level of shared decision making, particularly for 5 decisions most often made in primary care.