iFR/FFR/IVUS Discordance and Clinical Implications: Results From the Prospective Left Main Physiology Registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess discordance between results of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), fractional flow reserve (FFR), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in intermediate left main coronary (LM) lesions, and its impact on clinical decision making and outcome. METHODS: We enrolled 250 patients with a 40%-80% LM stenosis in a prospective, multicenter registry. These patients underwent both iFR and FFR measurements. Of these, 86 underwent IVUS and assessment of the minimal lumen area (MLA), with a 6 mm2 cutoff for significance. RESULTS: Isolated LM disease was recognized in 95 patients (38.0%), while 155 patients (62.0%) had both LM disease and downstream disease. In 53.2% of iFR+ and 56.7% of FFR+ LM lesions, the measurement was positive in only one daughter vessel. iFR/FFR discordance occurred in 25.0% of patients with isolated LM disease and 36.2% of patients with concomitant downstream disease (P=.049). In patients with isolated LM disease, discordance was significantly more common in the left anterior descending artery and younger age was an independent predictor of iFR-/FFR+ discordance. iFR/MLA and FFR/MLA discordance occurred in 37.0% and 29.4%, respectively. Within 1 year of follow-up, major cardiac adverse events (MACE) occurred in 8.5% and 9.7% (P=.763) of patients whose LM lesion was deferred or revascularized, respectively. Discordance was not an independent predictor of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: Current methods of estimating LM lesion significance often yield discrepant findings, complicating therapeutic decision-making.

Gender differences in risk factor management and pharmacological treatment among CHD patients: Belgian results of the EUROASPIRE IV and EUROASPIRE V surveys.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide an up-to-date overview of gender differences or similarities in risk factor control and medical management in the Belgian CHD population. METHODS: All analyses are based on the ESC EORP EUROASPIRE IV and EUROASPIRE V (European Survey Of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention And Diabetes) surveys. Patients between 18 and 80 years old, hospitalised for a first or recurrent coronary event, were included in the survey. RESULTS: Data were available for 10,519 patients, of which 23.9% were women. Women had a worse risk factor profile compared to men. Women were more physical inactive (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.19-1.44), had a higher prevalence of obesity (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.25-1.50) and had a worse LDL-C control (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.36-1.70). Moreover, women were less likely to use ACE-I/ARBs (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.76-0.94) and statins (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70-0.90). In addition, little gender differences were found in patients' risk factor awareness, except on cholesterol awareness. Women were more aware about their total cholesterol levels (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.21-1.56). CONCLUSION: Despite little to no gender differences in the management of CHD patients, women still have a worse risk factor profile, both in Belgian and in other European high-income countries.

Gender differences in health-related quality of life and psychological distress among coronary patients: Does comorbidity matter? Results from the ESC EORP EUROASPIRE V registry.

AIMS: This study aimed to provide an overview on contemporary gender differences in HRQoL/psychological distress and their relationship with comorbidity burden among European coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. METHODS: Analyses were based on the cross-sectional ESC EORP EUROASPIRE V survey. Consecutive patients (aged 18-80 years), hospitalized for a first or recurrent coronary event were included in this study. Data at hospital discharge and at follow-up (6 to 24 months after hospitalisation) were collected. RESULTS: Data were available for 8261 patients of which 25.8% women. Overall, women reported a worse EQ-5D-5L index score (0.73 vs. 0.81; P < 0.001), EQ-VAS (63.1 vs. 66.0; P = 0.001), global HeartQoL (1.94 vs. 2.26; P < 0.001), physical HeartQoL (1.96 vs. 2.30; P < 0.001), emotional HeartQoL (1.88 vs. 2.18; P < 0.001), HADS-A (6.69 vs. 4.99; P < 0.001), and HADS-D (5.73 vs. 4.62; P < 0.001) compared to men. Also, women were more likely to have comorbidities compared to men (1 comorbidity: 38.7% vs. 35.0%, 2 comorbidities: 9.7% vs. 7.5%; P < 0.001). There is indication that heart failure (EQ-VAS) and diabetes (global HeartQoL, emotional HeartQoL, physical HeartQoL, and HADS-D) interacted with gender and modulate the relationship with HRQoL, in disfavour of women. CONCLUSION: Substantial gender-based health inequalities in terms of HRQoL and psychological distress were found, in disfavour of women. Women had worse HRQoL and psychological distress outcomes when having comorbidities. To a limited extent, comorbidity and women had a negative/synergistic effect on HRQoL. Special attention should be given to this population groups within daily clinical practice.

Evaluation and management of cancer patients presenting with acute cardiovascular disease: a Clinical Consensus Statement of the Acute CardioVascular Care Association (ACVC) and the ESC council of Cardio-Oncology-part 2: acute heart failure, acute myocardial diseases, acute venous thromboembolic diseases, and acute arrhythmias.

Advances in treatment, common cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and the ageing of the population have led to an increasing number of cancer patients presenting with acute CV diseases. These events may be related to cancer itself or cancer treatment. Acute cardiac care specialists must be aware of these acute CV complications and be able to manage them. This may require an individualized and multidisciplinary approach. The management of acute coronary syndromes and acute pericardial diseases in cancer patients was covered in part 1 of a clinical consensus document. This second part focusses on acute heart failure, acute myocardial diseases, venous thromboembolic diseases and acute arrhythmias.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors - the revolutionary cancer immunotherapy comes with a cardiotoxic price.

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided a novel and revolutionary treatment option for previously incurable cancers. However, this major advancement is accompanied by a spectrum of cardiotoxic adverse events that are uncommon but potentially fatal. The oncologic indications of ICIs are becoming increasingly complex, requiring robust clinical monitoring to assess for cardiovascular complications. This is reflected in the recent introduction of the first cardio-oncology guidelines, a sign of the cardiovascular community's recognition that seeks to match this dynamic. The aim of this review is to summarize the cardiac side effects of ICI, with an emphasis on prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment options.

Impact of cancer diagnosis on distribution and trends of cardiovascular hospitalizations in the USA between 2004 and 2017.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is limited data on temporal trends of cardiovascular hospitalizations and outcomes amongst cancer patients. We describe the distribution, trends of admissions, and in-hospital mortality associated with key cardiovascular diseases among cancer patients in the USA between 2004 and 2017. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample we, identified admissions with five cardiovascular diseases of interest: acute myocardial infarction (AMI), pulmonary embolism (PE), ischaemic stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter, and intracranial haemorrhage. Patients were stratified by cancer status and type. We estimated crude annual rates of hospitalizations and annual in-hospital all-cause mortality rates. RESULTS: From >42.5 million hospitalizations with a primary cardiovascular diagnosis, 1.9 million (4.5%) had a concurrent record of cancer. Between 2004 and 2017, cardiovascular admission rates increased by 23.2% in patients with cancer, whilst decreasing by 10.9% in patients without cancer. The admission rate increased among cancer patients across all admission causes and cancer types except prostate cancer. Patients with haematological (9.7-13.5), lung (7.4-8.9), and GI cancer (4.6-6.3) had the highest crude rates of cardiovascular hospitalizations per 100 000 US population. Heart failure was the most common reason for cardiovascular admission in patients across all cancer types, except GI cancer (crude admission rates of 13.6-16.6 per 100 000 US population for patients with cancer). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to declining trends in patients without cancer, primary cardiovascular admissions in patients with cancer is increasing. The highest admission rates are in patients with haematological cancer, and the most common cause of admission is heart failure.

Right-sided aortic arch with Kommerell's diverticulum: a case report of a rare cause of type B dissection.

Background: A right-sided aortic arch (RAArch) is present in approximately 0.1% of the population. A Kommerell's diverticulum (KD), a remnant of the dorsal aortic arch usually refers to an aneurysmal aortic enlargement at the origin of an aberrant left subclavian artery (ALSA) and is associated with an increased risk of aortic dissection. Case summary: A 59-year-old female smoker with a history of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia presented with a 24-hour history of sudden-onset and severe stabbing chest pain radiating to the interscapular region. Physical examination was normal except for bilateral basal crepitations. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed a type B aortic dissection in a RAArch with an ALSA arising from KD with a peri-aortic haematoma and haemothorax without any active contrast extravasation. After medical stabilization, a semi-urgent hybrid repair was performed with a right carotid-subclavian bypass, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), a plug in the left subclavian artery, and left carotid-subclavian bypass due to severe ischaemia of the left arm. The postoperative CTA showed patent bypasses, aortic remodelling, and a minimal type IIa endoleak at the level of the ALSA. Discussion: In patients with a type B dissection and KD, hybrid repair including TEVAR is feasible after careful pre-operative assessment of the patient's unique anatomy and may reduce post-surgical morbidity and mortality compared to open surgery. Prophylactic repair may be considered in patients with an asymptomatic RAArch and KD.

Gender differences in cardiovascular risk factor awareness: Results from the ESC EORP EUROASPIRE V Registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients' risk factor awareness is essential to decrease the risk of recurrent coronary events. The aim of this study was to provide up-to-date evidence on existing gender differences in the patients' knowledge of risk factors and information provided by healthcare professionals. METHODS: Analyses were based on the cross-sectional ESC EORP EUROASPIRE V survey, including data on CHD patients across 27 European countries. Consecutive patients (18-80 years), hospitalized for a coronary event or surgical procedure, were retrospectively identified. Information on risk factor awareness was collected from medical records, medical examination, and structured questionnaires during the study visit (six months to two years after hospitalization). RESULTS: Patient information was available for 8261 patients, of which 25.8% were women. Although women with obesity were significantly less aware about their actual (OR = 0.66, CI = 0.52-0.85) and target weight levels (OR = 0.66, CI = 0.54-0.81), no significant gender differences in risk factor awareness were found in disfavour of women. Remarkably, women with hypertension and women with raised low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were even more aware about their target blood pressure levels (OR = 1.21, CI = 1.01-1.46) and actual cholesterol levels (OR = 1.18, CI = 1.02-1.36), respectively. Moreover, there is some indication that women were more informed by a healthcare professional if they had raised CHD risk factor levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed only few gender differences in disfavour of women in terms of risk factor awareness and information provided by a healthcare professional. Nevertheless, previous EUROASPIRE V findings demonstrated that women still have a poorer risk factor control in secondary CHD prevention.

Gender differences in lifestyle management among coronary patients and the association with education and age: results from the ESC EORP EUROASPIRE V registry.

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle management is essential in the secondary care of coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. Little evidence is available about gender differences in lifestyle counselling and lifestyle compliance. This study aimed to provide an overview on potential gender differences in lifestyle advice provided by a healthcare professional and patients' lifestyle compliance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analyses were based on the cross-sectional ESC EORP EUROASPIRE V survey including data on CHD patients across 27 European countries. Consecutive patients <80 years, hospitalized for a first or recurrent coronary event, were included in the study. Information on lifestyle management was collected from medical records, medical examination, and structured questionnaires during patient interviews (≥6 months to <2 years after hospitalization). Data were available for 8261 patients of whom 25.8% women. Overall, no gender differences were observed in lifestyle advice provided by a healthcare professional for smoking cessation advice, dietary advice, advice on losing weight, and physical activity advice (P > 0.05). However, a closer look at the particular actions to adopt a healthy diet revealed that women reported more frequently a reduction of their salt (68.6% vs. 73.7%; P = 0.002), fat (70.8% vs. 74.7%; P = 0.003), and calorie intake (56.8% vs. 60.5%; P = 0.004) compared to men. In contrast, women were less likely to increase their physical activity levels (55.5% vs. 48.0%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite little gender differences in lifestyle advice provided by a healthcare professional, lifestyle compliance for physical activity is worse in CHD women. Further actions are needed to increase physical activity levels in female CHD patients.

Mortality in STEMI Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: Results From a Nationwide PCI Registry and Focus on Left Main PCI.

BACKGROUND: The study aims to assess real-life short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS). Outcome after left main (LM) PCI is of particular interest. METHODS: Procedural, 30-day, and >30-day mortality rates were assessed in 2744 CS-STEMI patients enrolled between 2012 and 2019 in a nationwide registry involving 49 centers. RESULTS: Procedural, 30-day, and >30-day mortality rates were 6.9%, 39.8%, and 12.6%, respectively. The mortality rates were significantly higher in the 348 patients (12.7%) who underwent LM-PCI (13.5%, 59.5%, and 18.4%, respectively). LM-PCI, a suboptimal PCI result, and transfemoral access were independent predictors of procedural and 30-day mortality. Operator experience was an independent predictor of procedural mortality, but not 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality remains high in CS-STEMI patients, especially within the first month. Patients undergoing LM-PCI are particularly at risk. Operator experience is predictive of procedural mortality.

The use of cardiac troponins and B-type natriuretic peptide in COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still challenging health care systems worldwide. Over time, it has become clear that respiratory disease is not the only important entity as critically ill patients are also more prone to develop complications, such as acute cardiac injury. Despite extensive research, the mainstay of treatment still relies on supportive care and targeted therapy of these complications. The development of a prognostic model which helps clinicians to diverge patients to an appropriate level of care is thus crucial. As a result, several prognostic markers have been studied in the past few months. Among them are the cardiac biomarkers, especially cardiac troponins T/I and brain natriuretic peptide, which seem to have important prognostic values as several reports have confirmed their strong association with adverse clinical outcomes and death. The use of these biomarkers as part of a prognostic tool could potentially result in more precise risk stratification of COVID-19 patients and divergence to an adequate level of care. However, several caveats persist causing international guidelines to still recommend in favour of a more conservative approach to cardiac biomarker testing for prognostic purposes.

Malignant cardiac tamponade: safety and efficacy of intrapericardial bleomycin instillation.

BACKGROUND: Malignant cardiac tamponade is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt treatment and effective management to prevent recurrence. This paper describes safety and efficacy outcomes after intrapericardial instillation of bleomycin as well as possible predictors of survival. METHODS: We performed a 10-year retrospective, single-center study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intrapericardial instillation of bleomycin in patients with suspected malignant cardiac tamponade. RESULTS: Intrapericardial instillation of bleomycin was performed in 31 cancer patients (9 men, 22 women) presenting with cardiac tamponade. Non-fatal complications occurred in 3 patients and relapse occurred in 1 patient. Overall survival was less than 10% at the end of the study. Median survival was 104 days (95% CI, 0-251 days). Survival was compared between different groups (defined by primary tumor, type of tumor, TNM stage and results of cytological analysis) with median survival being considerably higher when oncologic therapy was altered afterwards. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intrapericardial bleomycin instillation following pericardiocentesis for malignant cardiac tamponade is a safe procedure with a high success rate. Survival rates depend on further oncological treatment options available.

Gender gap in risk factor control of coronary patients far from closing: results from the European Society of Cardiology EUROASPIRE V registry.

AIMS: This study aims to provide an overview on contemporary gender differences in the risk factor control of coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analyses were based on the cross-sectional ESC (European Society of Cardiology) EORP (EurObservational Research Programme) EUROASPIRE V (European Survey of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Diabetes) survey including data on CHD patients across 27 European countries. Men and women between 18 and 80 years old, hospitalized for a first or recurrent coronary event were included in the study. Data were available for 8261 patients of which 25.8% women. Overall, women had a worse risk factor control compared with men. Whereas women were more likely to be non-smokers (79.3% vs. 87.2%; P < 0.001), they were less likely to reach recommended levels of physical activity (36.8% vs. 27.5%; P < 0.001), and they were less likely to be non-obese (65.1% vs. 54.3%; P < 0.001). There is indication that risk factors such as smoking behaviour and obesity differed depending on country income level. No gender differences could be observed in blood pressure on target (P > 0.05). Moreover, a lower proportion of women reached low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target levels (31.4% vs. 22.1%; P < 0.001), and they were less likely to reach glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) targets if having self-reported diabetes (56.7% vs. 48.6%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The risk factor control of CHD women is substantial worse compared with men despite little gender differences in cardiovascular medication intake. Further actions are needed to increase the awareness of the worse risk factor control in female CHD patients.

Clinical validation of a 13-lead electrocardiogram derived from a self-applicable 3-lead recording for diagnosis of myocardial supply ischaemia and common non-ischaemic electrocardiogram abnormalities at rest.

Aims: In this study, we compare the diagnostic accuracy of a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) with a novel 13-lead ECG derived from a self-applicable 3-lead ECG recorded with the right exploratory left foot (RELF) device. The 13th lead is a novel age and sex orthonormalized computed ST (ASO-ST) lead to increase the sensitivity for detecting ischaemia during acute coronary artery occlusion. Methods and results: A database of simultaneously recorded 12-lead ECGs and RELF recordings from 110 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty and 30 healthy subjects was used. Five cardiologists scored the learning data set and five other cardiologists scored the validation data set. In addition, the presence of non-ischaemic ECG abnormalities was compared. The accuracy for detection of myocardial supply ischaemia with the derived 12 leads was comparable with that of the standard 12-lead ECG (P = 0.126). By adding the ASO-ST lead, the accuracy increased to 77.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 72.4-82.3; P < 0.001], which was attributed to a higher sensitivity of 81.9% (95% CI: 74.8-89.1) for the RELF 13-lead ECG compared with a sensitivity of 76.8% (95% CI: 71.9-81.7; P < 0.001) for the 12-lead ECG. There was no significant difference in the diagnosis of non-ischaemic ECG abnormalities, except for Q-waves that were more frequently detected on the standard ECG compared with the derived ECG (25.9 vs. 13.8%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: A self-applicable and easy-to-use 3-lead RELF device can compute a 12-lead ECG plus an ischaemia-specific 13th lead that is, compared with the standard 12-lead ECG, more accurate for the visual diagnosis of myocardial supply ischaemia by cardiologists.

The Prognostic Value of Cardiac Biomarkers and Echocardiography in Critical COVID-19.

Background: Early risk stratification is crucial in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Myocardial injury is associated with worse outcome. This study aimed to evaluate cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic findings in critically ill COVID-19 patients and to assess their association with 30-day mortality in comparison to other biomarkers, risk factors and clinical severity scores. Methods: Prospective, single-center, cohort study in patients with PCR-confirmed, critical COVID-19. Laboratory assessment included high sensitive troponin T (hs-cTnT) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) on admission to ICU: a hs-cTnT ≥ 14 pg/mL and a NT-proBNP ≥ 450 pg/mL were considered as elevated. Transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation was performed within the first 48 h of ICU admission. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Predictive markers for mortality were assessed by ROC analysis and cut-off values by the Youden Index. Results: A total of 100 patients were included. The median age was 63.5 years, the population was predominantly male (66%). At the time of ICU admission, 47% of patients had elevated hs-cTnT and 39% had elevated NT-proBNP. Left ventricular ejection fraction was below 50% in 19.1%. Elevated cardiac biomarkers (hs-cTnT P-value < 0.001, NT-proBNP P-value = 0.001) and impaired left ventricular function (P-value = 0.011) were significantly associated with mortality, while other biomarkers (D-dimer, ferritin, C-reactive protein) and clinical scores (SOFA) did not differ significantly between survivors and non-survivors. An optimal cut-off value to predict increased risk for 30-day all-cause mortality was 16.5 pg/mL for hs-cTnT (OR 8.5, 95% CI: 2.9, 25.0) and 415.5 pg/ml for NT-proBNP (OR 5.1, 95% CI: 1.8, 14.7). Conclusion: Myocardial injury in COVID-19 is common. Early detection of elevated hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP are predictive for 30-day mortality in patients with critical COVID-19. These markers outperform other routinely used biomarkers, as well as clinical indices of disease severity in ICU. The additive value of routine transthoracic echocardiography is disputable and should only be considered if it is likely to impact therapeutic management.

Evaluation and management of cancer patients presenting with acute cardiovascular disease: a Consensus Document of the Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC) association and the ESC council of Cardio-Oncology-Part 1: acute coronary syndromes and acute pericardial diseases.

Advances in treatment, common cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and the ageing of the population have led to an increasing number of cancer patients presenting with acute CV diseases. These events may be related to the cancer itself or the cancer treatment. Acute cardiac care specialists must be aware of these acute CV complications and be able to manage them. This may require an individualized and multidisciplinary approach. We summarize the most common acute CV complications of cytotoxic, targeted, and immune-based therapies. This is followed by a proposal for a multidisciplinary approach where acute cardiologists work close together with the treating oncologists, haematologists, and radiation specialists, especially in situations where immediate therapeutic decisions are needed. In this first part, we further focus on the management of acute coronary syndromes and acute pericardial diseases in patients with cancer.