A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of trofinetide in patients with rett syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Rett syndrome (RTT) is an uncommon inherited neurodevelopmental disorder that affects brain development, mostly in females. It results from mutation in MECP2 gene in the long arm (q) of the X chromosome. OBJECTIVE: Trofinetide is a recently developed drug that has a neuroprotective effect on neurons, and it is our aim in this meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety in treating Rett syndrome patients. METHODS: We searched 5 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Trofinetide and placebo in patients with Rett syndrome until August 13, 2023.Our primary outcomes were the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) and the Rett syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ). We used Risk of Bias Assessment tool-2 (ROB2) to assess the methodological quality of the included randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Three RCTs with a total of 325 patients were included with a follow-up duration ranging from one month to three months. 186 patients received the intervention drug (Trofinetide) and 138 received the placebo. Trofinetide was found to reduce CGI and RSBQ significantly more than placebo (MD = -0.35, 95% CI [-0.52 to -0.18], P 0.0001), (MD = -3.40, 95% CI [-3.69 to -3.12], P 0.00001) respectively. Most adverse events did not show any statistical difference between Trofinetide and the placebo. CONCLUSION: Trofinetide offers promise as a potential effective and safe therapeutic opportunity for a population without many available treatments, with improvements seen on both CGI and RSBQ assessments and no severe adverse effects reported.

Predictors of early and late postoperative seizures in meningioma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Meningioma is the most common type of primary brain tumor which presents with a variety of neurological manifestations. Surgical resection tends to be the preferred treatment. The occurrence of seizures after resection is common, which occur either early, within seven days of operation, or late. Our meta-analysis investigated the possible predictors of early and late postoperative seizures. We assessed the relevant observational studies on predictors of postoperative seizures published in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2000 to September 2022, and those that met inclusion criteria were included. We calculated the association between potential predicting factors and postoperative seizures, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) applying either random or fixed-effect models. The early and late postoperative seizures were evaluated individually. Thirteen observational studies involving 4176 patients were included. Seizures occurred in 250 (6%) and 584 (14%) patients, respectively, in the early and late postoperative phases. Shared predictors for early and late seizures included tumors involving the motor cortex (OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.67-4.38, OR = 2.46; 95% CI: 1.68-3.61), postoperative neurological deficit (OR = 4.68; 95% CI: 2.67-8.22, OR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.39-2.92), and preoperative seizures (OR = 2.52; 95% CI: 1.82-3.49, OR = 4.35; 95% CI: 3.29-5.75). Peritumoral edema (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.49-2.64) was a significant factor only among late postoperative seizure patients while surgical complications (OR = 3.77; 95% CI: 2.39-5.93) was a significant factor solely for early postoperative seizures. Meningioma patients commonly experience early and late postoperative seizures. Identifying predictors of postoperative seizures is essential to diagnose and manage them effectively.

The Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of different malignancies. However, their efficacy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) remains uncertain. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the efficacy and tolerability of ICIs in patients with advanced ACC. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL for studies that used ICIs in ACC. Studies with more than five patients were included in the meta-analysis of the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade 3/4 adverse events. Twenty studies with 23 treatment arms and 250 patients were included. Single-agent anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 treatment was utilized in 13 treatment arms, whereas an anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4 combination was used in 4 treatment arms. Other anti-PD1- or anti-PD-L1-based combinations were used in five treatment arms. The ORR was 14% (95% CI = 10-19%, I2 = 0%), and the DCR was 43% (95% CI = 37-50%, I2 = 13%). The combination anti-PD1- or anti-PD-L1-based treatment strategies did not correlate with higher responses compared with monotherapy. The median OS was 13.9 months (95% CI = 7.85-23.05), and the median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI = 1.8-5.4). ICIs have a modest efficacy in advanced ACC but a good OS. Further studies are needed to investigate predictive biomarkers for ICI response and to compare ICI-based strategies with the current standard of care.