The effect of dairy products and non-dairy snacks on food intake, subjective appetite and cortisol levels in children: a randomized control study.

Dairy snacks are available in various physical forms and their consumption is linked to improved metabolic health. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of dairy snacks of different physical forms on short-term food intake (FI), subjective appetite, and the stress hormone, cortisol, in children. Following a repeated-measures crossover design, 40 children aged 9-14 years randomly consumed 1 of 5 isoenergetic (180 kcal) snacks per study session. These snacks included solid (potato chips, cookies, and cheese), semi-solid (Greek yogurt), and fluid (2% fat milk) snacks. FI was measured 120 min after snack consumption. Subjective appetite was measured at 0 (immediately before the snack), 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min. Salivary cortisol (n = 18) was measured after the Greek yogurt and cookie snacks at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. FI did not differ between snacks (P = 0.15). The Greek yogurt (P < 0.0001) and cheese (P = 0.0009) snacks reduced average appetite compared with the 2% fat milk snack. Salivary cortisol levels were not affected by snack (P = 0.84). This study demonstrates that dairy snacks are as effective as other popular snacks at influencing subsequent FI. However, solid and semi-solid dairy snacks are more effective at repressing subjective appetite than a fluid dairy snack. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02484625). Novelty: Milk, Greek yogurt and cheese have a similar effect on short-term food intake in children as popular potato chips and cookie snacks. Solid, semi-solid and liquid snacks have a similar effect on short-term food intake in children.

Benefits and Adverse Effects of Histidine Supplementation.

Histidine is a nutritionally essential amino acid with many recognized benefits to human health, while circulating concentrations of histidine decline in pathologic conditions [e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD)]. The purpose of this review is to examine the existing literature regarding the benefits of histidine intake, the adverse effects of excess histidine, and the upper tolerance level for histidine. Supplementation with doses of 4.0-4.5 g histidine/d and increased dietary histidine intake are associated with decreased BMI, adiposity, markers of glucose homeostasis (e.g., HOMA-IR, fasting blood glucose, 2-h postprandial blood glucose), proinflammatory cytokines, and oxidative stress. It is unclear from the limited number of studies in humans whether the improvements in glucoregulatory markers, inflammation, and oxidative stress are due to reduced BMI and adiposity, increased carnosine (a metabolic product of histidine with antioxidant effects), or both. Histidine intake also improves cognitive function (e.g., reduces appetite, anxiety, and stress responses and improves sleep) potentially through the metabolism of histidine to histamine; however, this relation is ambiguous in humans. At high intakes of histidine (>24 g/d), studies report adverse effects of histidine such as decreased serum zinc and cognitive impairment. There is limited research on the effects of histidine intake at doses between 4.5 and 24 g/d, and thus, a tolerable upper level has not been established. Determining tolerance to histidine supplementation has been limited by small sample sizes and, more important, a lack of a clear biomarker for histidine supplementation. The U-shaped curve of circulating zinc concentrations with histidine supplementation could be exploited as a relevant biomarker for supplemental histidine tolerance. Histidine is an important amino acid and may be necessary as a supplement in some populations; however, gaps in knowledge, which this review highlights, need to be addressed scientifically.

Tolerance to graded dosages of histidine supplementation in healthy human adults.

BACKGROUND: Histidine is an essential amino acid with health benefits that may warrant histidine supplementation; however, the clinical safety of histidine intake above the average dietary intake (1.52-5.20 g/d) needs to be vetted. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the tolerance to graded dosages of histidine in a healthy adult population. METHODS: Healthy adults aged 21-50 y completed graded dosages of histidine supplement (4, 8, and 12 g/d, Study 1) (n = 20 men and n = 20 women) and/or a 16-g/d dosage of histidine (Study 2, n = 21 men and n = 19 women); 27 participants (n = 12 men and n = 15 women) completed both studies. After study enrollment and baseline measures, participants consumed encapsulated histidine for 4 wk followed by a 3-wk recovery period. Primary outcomes included vitals, select biochemical analytes, anthropometry, serum zinc, and body composition (via DXA). RESULTS: No changes in vitals or body composition occurred with histidine supplementation in either study. Plasma histidine (measured in subjects who completed all dosages for Studies 1 and 2) was elevated at the 12- and 16-g/d dosages (compared with 0-8 g/d, P < 0.05) and blood urea nitrogen increased with dosage (P = 0.013) and time (P < 0.001) in Study 1 and with time in Study 2 (P < 0.001). In Study 1, mean ferritin concentrations were lower in 12 g/d (46.0 ng/mL; 95% CI: 34.8, 60.9 ng/mL) than in 4 g/d (51.6 ng/mL; 95% CI: 39.0, 68.4 ng/mL; P = 0.038). In Study 2, 16 g/d increased mean aspartate aminotransferase from baseline (19 U/L; 95% CI: 17, 22 U/L) to week 4 (24 U/L; 95% CI: 21, 27 U/L; P < 0.001) and mean serum zinc decreased from baseline (0.75 µg/dL; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.80 µg/dL) to week 4 (0.70 µg/dL; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.74 µg/dL; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Although values remained within the normal reference ranges for all analytes measured, in all dosages tested, the human no-observed adverse effect level was determined to be 8 g/d owing to changes in blood parameters at the 12-g/d dosage.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04142294.