RESUMO
Depression is a common and disabling disorder in later life, particularly among people with poor physical health. There are many screening tools available that can be used to examine depressive symptoms; however, not all of them may be appropriate or accurate for older adults with cancer. This pilot study was designed to test the diagnostic performance of two screening tools and their short versions in a cohort of vulnerable (G8 score ≤ 14/17) older patients with cancer undergoing comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). The prospective analysis covered 50 vulnerable patients with cancer aged ≥70 years. The diagnostic performance of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-15, GDS-4, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and PHQ-2 was compared to the 'gold standard' Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders (SCID-5-S) depression module A. The sensitivity and specificity in detecting depressive symptoms were the highest in the case of PHQ-2, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 92.7%. The AUROC for the 9-item version, PHQ-9, was 90.2%. For the GDS-15 and GDS-4, the AUROC was only 56.2% and 62.0%, respectively. The SCREEN pilot study illustrates the potential benefit of using a shorter screening tool, PHQ-2, to identify older patients with cancer who would benefit from a more in-depth emotional evaluation as part of a CGA.
Assuntos
Depressão , Neoplasias , Idoso , Humanos , Depressão/diagnóstico , Avaliação Geriátrica , Projetos Piloto , Detecção Precoce de CâncerRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and the most frequent sarcomas in some geographic regions. In patients with metastatic GIST, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib is the first-line standard of care. Mutations in KIT or specific platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) gene aberrations in the tumor cells predict a favorable response to this agent, while tumors without KIT or PDGFRA mutations ("wild-type" GISTs) are usually resistant to such treatment. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is commonly used for mutational analysis of GISTs. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of an unexpected response to imatinib treatment in a GIST that was initially called "wild-type" based on routine NGS. A spectacular response to empirical imatinib treatment triggered further genetic analysis and led to the identification of a 45-bp duplication in KIT exon 11 undetectable by routine NGS. CONCLUSION: Negative findings on routine NGS testing for KIT alterations do not exclude the presence of actionable drug targets, as in the case of larger or complex gene insertions or deletions. Updating the NGS bioinformatics pipeline to ensure identification of larger deletions or insertions or additional Sanger sequencing is warranted in NGS driver-negative GISTs in order to allow accurate detection of actionable mutations.