Enhanced Cardiomyocyte NLRP3 Inflammasome Signaling Promotes Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently associated with enhanced inflammatory response. The NLRP3 (NACHT, LRR, and PYD domain containing protein 3) inflammasome mediates caspase-1 activation and interleukin-1ß release in immune cells but is not known to play a role in cardiomyocytes (CMs). Here, we assessed the role of CM NLRP3 inflammasome in AF. METHODS: NLRP3 inflammasome activation was assessed by immunoblot in atrial whole-tissue lysates and CMs from patients with paroxysmal AF or long-standing persistent (chronic) AF. To determine whether CM-specific activation of NLPR3 is sufficient to promote AF, a CM-specific knockin mouse model expressing constitutively active NLRP3 (CM-KI) was established. In vivo electrophysiology was used to assess atrial arrhythmia vulnerability. To evaluate the mechanism of AF, electric activation pattern, Ca2+ spark frequency, atrial effective refractory period, and morphology of atria were evaluated in CM-KI mice and wild-type littermates. RESULTS: NLRP3 inflammasome activity was increased in the atrial CMs of patients with paroxysmal AF and chronic AF. CM-KI mice developed spontaneous premature atrial contractions and inducible AF, which was attenuated by a specific NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor, MCC950. CM-KI mice exhibited ectopic activity, abnormal sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release, atrial effective refractory period shortening, and atrial hypertrophy. Adeno-associated virus subtype-9-mediated CM-specific knockdown of Nlrp3 suppressed AF development in CM-KI mice. Finally, genetic inhibition of Nlrp3 prevented AF development in CREM transgenic mice, a well-characterized mouse model of spontaneous AF. CONCLUSIONS: Our study establishes a novel pathophysiological role for CM NLRP3 inflammasome signaling, with a mechanistic link to the pathogenesis of AF, and establishes the inhibition of NLRP3 as a potential novel AF therapy approach.

Investigational antiarrhythmic agents: promising drugs in early clinical development.

INTRODUCTION: Although there have been important technological advances for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias (e.g., catheter ablation technology), antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) remain the cornerstone therapy for the majority of patients with arrhythmias. Most of the currently available AADs were coincidental findings and did not result from a systematic development process based on known arrhythmogenic mechanisms and specific targets. During the last 20 years, our understanding of cardiac electrophysiology and fundamental arrhythmia mechanisms has increased significantly, resulting in the identification of new potential targets for mechanism-based antiarrhythmic therapy. Areas covered: Here, we review the state-of-the-art in arrhythmogenic mechanisms and AAD therapy. Thereafter, we focus on a number of antiarrhythmic targets that have received significant attention recently: atrial-specific K+-channels, the late Na+-current, the cardiac ryanodine-receptor channel type-2, and the small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+-channel. We highlight for each of these targets available antiarrhythmic agents and the evidence for their antiarrhythmic effect in animal models and early clinical development. Expert opinion: Targeting AADs to specific subgroups of well-phenotyped patients is likely necessary to detect improved outcomes that may be obscured in the population at large. In addition, specific combinations of selective AADs may have synergistic effects and may enable a mechanism-based tailored antiarrhythmic therapy.

Serine/Threonine Phosphatases in Atrial Fibrillation.

Serine/threonine protein phosphatases control dephosphorylation of numerous cardiac proteins, including a variety of ion channels and calcium-handling proteins, thereby providing precise post-translational regulation of cardiac electrophysiology and function. Accordingly, dysfunction of this regulation can contribute to the initiation, maintenance and progression of cardiac arrhythmias. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder and is characterized by electrical, autonomic, calcium-handling, contractile, and structural remodeling, which include, among other things, changes in the phosphorylation status of a wide range of proteins. Here, we review AF-associated alterations in the phosphorylation of atrial ion channels, calcium-handling and contractile proteins, and their role in AF-pathophysiology. We highlight the mechanisms controlling the phosphorylation of these proteins and focus on the role of altered dephosphorylation via local type-1, type-2A and type-2B phosphatases (PP1, PP2A, and PP2B, also known as calcineurin, respectively). Finally, we discuss the challenges for phosphatase research, potential therapeutic significance of altered phosphatase-mediated protein dephosphorylation in AF, as well as future directions.

Calcium Handling Abnormalities as a Target for Atrial Fibrillation Therapeutics: How Close to Clinical Implementation?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a substantial impact on morbidity and mortality. Antiarrhythmic drugs play a major role in rhythm-control therapy of AF. However, currently available agents exhibit limited efficacy and pronounced adverse effects, notably drug-induced proarrhythmia. Recent experimental studies have identified that Ca handling abnormalities are critical elements in AF pathophysiology with central roles in atrial ectopic activity, reentry, and atrial remodeling suggesting that Ca handling abnormalities could be promising targets for novel AF therapeutics. Here, we summarize key aspects of AF-related Ca-handling abnormalities, describe currently available compounds targeting atrial Ca handling, and highlight potential novel targets and experimental drugs currently under investigation. Finally, we assess how close AF therapeutics based on Ca-handling abnormalities are to clinical implementation.

Sodium channel block by ranolazine in an experimental model of stretch-related atrial fibrillation: prolongation of interatrial conduction time and increase in post-repolarization refractoriness.

AIMS: In several clinical and pre-clinical studies, application of ranolazine (RAN) led to suppression of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether RAN can suppress AF in an experimental rabbit whole heart model, in which acute haemodynamic changes trigger AF. Ranolazine was compared with flecainide and sotalol as established antiarrhythmic agents. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 60 Langendorff-perfused, isolated rabbit hearts, AF episodes were evoked by burst pacing with a fixed number of stimuli at baseline and following acute atrial stretch. Data were obtained in the absence and presence of acute dilatation of the left atrium (20 mmHg) at baseline and after drug application (RAN 10 µM, n = 10; flecainide 2 µM, n = 10; sotalol 50 µM, n = 10). Application of sotalol, but not RAN or flecainide increased the atrial action potential duration at 90% repolarization (aAPD90); however, both RAN (+8 ms) and flecainide (+13 ms) increased interatrial conduction time. All three drugs caused a significant increase in atrial effective refractory period (aERP) and, thus, an increase in atrial post-repolarization refractoriness (aPRR: +11 ms each, P < 0.05). Acute dilatation of the left atrium reduced aAPD90 and aERP. The described drug effects were preserved in the setting of acute atrial dilatation. Acute atrial dilatation significantly increased the incidence of AF. Ranolazine and flecainide, but not sotalol, decreased the number of responses. CONCLUSION: Ranolazine-related sodium channel block is preserved upon acute atrial stretch. Ranolazine suppresses stretch-induced AF by increasing interatrial conduction time and aPRR. These results shed further evidence on the potential role of RAN in the prevention of AF. This might also apply to clinical conditions that are associated with haemodynamic or mechanical disorders, leading to acute dilatation of the atria.