Serum inflammatory markers as prognostic marker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with liver metastasis: a multi-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study investigated the prognostic value of serum inflammatory markers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, focusing on their association with overall survival (OS) and liver metastasis-free survival (LMFS). METHODS: The study included 314 NPC patients treated between 2010 and 2020. Clinical characteristics, treatment methods, and serum inflammatory markers were assessed. Patients were categorized into two groups of with and without liver metastasis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to investigate the prognostic value of serum inflammatory markers in NPC patients with and without liver metastasis. RESULTS: In the whole cohort, univariate Cox regression analysis singled out tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.44-4.90, p = 0.004) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.33-3.99, p = 0.009), which were significantly associated with poorer OS. In patients with liver metastasis, TNF-α and NLR could not independently predict OS. However, high TNF-α levels were independently associated with worse OS in patients without liver metastasis (HR (95% CI) = 2.75 (1.67-8.68), p < 0.001). High NLR levels could independently predict poor OS in both groups with (HR (95% CI) = 1.94 (1.77-6.38), p = 0.010) and without liver metastasis (HR (95% CI) = 1.58 (1.19-7.54), p = 0.009). Ultimately, TNF-α and NLR could not significantly predict LMFS. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the prognostic significance of TNF-α and NLR in NPC patients, especially in those with liver metastasis. These inflammatory markers could serve as valuable indicators for assessing the prognosis of NPC patients. Further research is warranted to validate their clinical utility and explore potential therapeutic implications.

The association of upper respiratory infections with neuro-radiological course and attack rate of multiple sclerosis: Results from a large prospective cohort.

Background: Although upper respiratory infections (URIs) are linked to multiple sclerosis (MS) attacks, SARS-COV2 has not been compared to URIs for attack rates. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the attack rate and the results of neuroimaging in MS patients with URIs caused by COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 infections (NC-URI). Methods: From May 2020 to April 2021, we followed 362 patients with relapsing-remitting MS in a prospective cohort design. Patients were monitored regularly every 12 weeks; an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was performed at enrollment and every time a relapse occurred. Poisson analysis was used to determine exacerbation rate ratios (RR) and the MRI parameters were tested using chi-square analysis. Results: 347 patients with an average age of 38 and a female ratio of 86% were included. A RR of 2.24 (p < 0.001) was observed for exacerbations during the at-risk period (ARP). Attacks related to COVID-19 (RR = 2.13, p = 0.001) and NC-URIs (RR = 2.39, p < 0.001) were comparable regarding the increased risk of exacerbation (p = 0.62). Exacerbations within or outside the ARP did not significantly alter the number of baseline GAD-enhancing lesions (p > 0.05 for both). Conclusion: COVID-19 has been shown to increase the risk of MS exacerbations, like other viral URIs.

A rare case of prostate cancer initially presented by disseminated intravascular coagulation-related subdural hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) has been reported in various solid malignancies and is a common coagulation-related complication in prostate cancer. However, DIC has been rarely reported as the initial presentation of prostate cancer. Herein, we reported a patient referring with subdural hemorrhage (SDH) and DIC with an unexplained cause who was later diagnosed with prostate cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: We presented a 68-year-old man who was referred to the hospital with a gradual deterioration of consciousness, dyspnea, and edema in the genitalia and lower limbs. His primary laboratory tests showed elevated prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and a decreased fibrinogen level of 47 mg/dL [200-400 mg/dL]. The DIC score was 7, which was suggestive of DIC. Moreover, cranial imaging showed SDH. Further work-up revealed elevated prostate-specific antigen and prostate enlargement with a mass effect on the bladder with a bone lesion, which was suggestive of metastatic prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: This report highlights DIC as a possible initial presentation of an underlying malignancy, as well as the importance of treatment of underlying disease in the management of DIC. A comprehensive and systematic work-up is essential for early diagnosis in patients with DIC to avoid further complications and mortality.