A Systematic Review on Deep Structured Learning for COVID-19 Screening Using Chest CT from 2020 to 2022.

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan in 2019 led to the discovery of a novel coronavirus. The World Health Organization (WHO) designated it as a global pandemic on 11 March 2020 due to its rapid and widespread transmission. Its impact has had profound implications, particularly in the realm of public health. Extensive scientific endeavors have been directed towards devising effective treatment strategies and vaccines. Within the healthcare and medical imaging domain, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) has brought significant advantages. This study delves into peer-reviewed research articles spanning the years 2020 to 2022, focusing on AI-driven methodologies for the analysis and screening of COVID-19 through chest CT scan data. We assess the efficacy of deep learning algorithms in facilitating decision making processes. Our exploration encompasses various facets, including data collection, systematic contributions, emerging techniques, and encountered challenges. However, the comparison of outcomes between 2020 and 2022 proves intricate due to shifts in dataset magnitudes over time. The initiatives aimed at developing AI-powered tools for the detection, localization, and segmentation of COVID-19 cases are primarily centered on educational and training contexts. We deliberate on their merits and constraints, particularly in the context of necessitating cross-population train/test models. Our analysis encompassed a review of 231 research publications, bolstered by a meta-analysis employing search keywords (COVID-19 OR Coronavirus) AND chest CT AND (deep learning OR artificial intelligence OR medical imaging) on both the PubMed Central Repository and Web of Science platforms.

AI Tools for Assessing Human Fertility Using Risk Factors: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Infertility has massively disrupted social and marital life, resulting in stressful emotional well-being. Early diagnosis is the utmost need for faster adaption to respond to these changes, which makes possible via AI tools. Our main objective is to comprehend the role of AI in fertility detection since we have primarily worked to find biomarkers and related risk factors associated with infertility. This paper aims to vividly analyse the role of AI as an effective method in screening, predicting for infertility and related risk factors. Three scientific repositories: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, are used to gather relevant articles via technical terms: (human infertility OR human fertility) AND risk factors AND (machine learning OR artificial intelligence OR intelligent system). In this way, we systematically reviewed 42 articles and performed a meta-analysis. The significant findings and recommendations are discussed. These include the rising importance of data augmentation, feature extraction, explainability, and the need to revisit the meaning of an effective system for fertility analysis. Additionally, the paper outlines various mitigation actions that can be employed to tackle infertility and its related risk factors. These insights contribute to a better understanding of the role of AI in fertility analysis and the potential for improving reproductive health outcomes.

Unboxing Industry-Standard AI Models for Male Fertility Prediction with SHAP.

Infertility is a social stigma for individuals, and male factors cause approximately 30% of infertility. Despite this, male infertility is underrecognized and underrepresented as a disease. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), changes in lifestyle and environmental factors are the prime reasons for the declining rate of male fertility. Artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) models have become an effective solution for early fertility detection. Seven industry-standard ML models are used: support vector machine, random forest (RF), decision tree, logistic regression, naïve bayes, adaboost, and multi-layer perception to detect male fertility. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) are vital tools that examine the feature's impact on each model's decision making. On these, we perform a comprehensive comparative study to identify good and poor classification models. While dealing with the all-above-mentioned models, the RF model achieves an optimal accuracy and area under curve (AUC) of 90.47% and 99.98%, respectively, by considering five-fold cross-validation (CV) with the balanced dataset. Furthermore, we provide the SHAP explanations of existing models that attain good and poor performance. The findings of this study show that decision making (based on ML models) with SHAP provides thorough explanations for detecting male fertility, as well as a reference for clinicians for further treatment planning.