Influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp utilization on deep bite correction and root length in adults.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp use on skeletal deep overbite correction and root length and volume of maxillary anterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 60 adults with skeletal deep overbite. Patients were divided into three groups: Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) with precision bite ramps (Invisalign with Bite Ramps [IBR] = 12), Invisalign with no bite ramps (INBR = 22), and full-fixed appliances (FFA = 26). Cone beam computed tomography records at T1 (pretreatment) and T2 (posttreatment) were used to measure eight skeletal, nine dental, and three soft-tissue cephalometric variables. Maxillary anterior teeth root length (mm), root volume (mm3), and percent root volume loss between T1 and T2 (%) were also recorded. RESULTS: Significant changes from T1 to T2 among the three groups were seen in ANB(o), lower face height (%), ODI (overbite depth indicator) (o), and U1-SN (o). Reduction in root length was significantly less (P < .001) in the INBR and IBR groups compared to the FFA group. Reduction in root volume and percent volume loss were significantly higher in the INBR group compared to the IBR group (P < .001), but the difference between the two Invisalign groups and the FFA group was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal deep overbite correction using Invisalign with or without bite ramps is comparable to FFA. Reduction in root length was significantly less with Invisalign compared to FFA. Bite ramps influenced root volume and volume loss but not root length.

Association between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and bone mineral density in adult orthodontic populations.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and predicted bone mineral density (BMD) in adults presenting for orthodontic treatment. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 38 adults divided into OSAS and non-OSAS groups. Using pre-treatment CBCT images, radiographic density (RD) of left and right lateral regions of the 1st cervical vertebrae and dens of the 2nd cervical vertebrae were measured as an indicator for BMD. RESULTS: When controlling for age, sex, and BMI, the mean RD was significantly lower in the OSAS group compared to the non-OSAS group (left CV1: 36.69 ± 84.50 vs. 81.67 ± 93.25 Hounsfield Units [HU], respectively, p = 0.031; right CV1: 30.59 ± 81.18 vs. 74.26 ± 91.81 HU, p = 0.045; dens: 159.25 ± 115.96 vs. 223.94 ± 106.09 HU, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Adults with OSAS have lower values for predicted BMD than those without OSAS.

Effects of clear aligner therapy for Class II malocclusion on upper airway morphology and daytime sleepiness in adults: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the effects of clear aligner therapy (CAT) on the upper airway dimensions and on daytime sleepiness in adults with dentoskeletal Class II malocclusion. METHODS: This study was conducted from August 2017 to February 2019. Inclusion criteria were healthy adults≥18years old, Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion, first-molar relationship of end-to-end or greater, overjet<10mm, and presenting for multi-arch comprehensive orthodontic treatment with aligners. Treatment mechanics included mandibular dentoalveolar advancement with Class II elastics without maxillary sequential distalization programmed into aligners. Post-treatment changes in dentoskeletal and upper airway dimensions were assessed using CBCT images. The treatment effect on daytime sleepiness was evaluated using an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). RESULTS: Eight subjects were included in this pilot study (mean age at treatment initiation=44.6years [SD=15.3]). The mean treatment duration was 12.2months (SD=3.4). No statistically significant treatment changes were observed in upper airway dimensions or dentoskeletal cephalometric analyses. Subjects with excessive daytime sleepiness at pre-treatment reported an improvement post-treatment, but no significant difference in the mean ESS score was found. CONCLUSION: Treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in adults by mandibular dentoalveolar advancement using CAT has no statistically significant effects on the airway and dentoskeletal measurements, or daytime sleepiness.