Lateral Temporal Bone Resection With a High-Riding Jugular Bulb.

ABSTRACT: A high-riding jugular bulb can complicate standard otologic and neurotologic approaches and must be taken into account during surgical planning.

Losartan May Not Prevent Vestibular Schwannoma Growth or Related Hearing Loss During Observation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of losartan on vestibular schwannoma (VS) growth and related hearing loss during observation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Sporadic VS patients undergoing initial observation with at least two magnetic resonance imaging and audiologic examinations. INTERVENTION: Losartan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Endpoints included VS growth, quantitative audiologic changes, survival free of tumor growth, and survival free of nonserviceable hearing. Patient characteristics and endpoints were compared by losartan use. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included, of which 33% were taking losartan. Tumor growth was observed in 50% of patients in the losartan group and 36% in the non-losartan group (p = 0.329). Survival analysis failed to show a significant difference in the hazard rate of VS growth between groups (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-2.70; p = 0.346). Throughout observation, mean decreases in normalized pure-tone average were 5.5 and 9.3 dB in the losartan and non-losartan groups, respectively (p = 0.908). Mean decreases in normalized word recognition score were 11.0 and 16.6% in the losartan and non-losartan groups, respectively (p = 0.757). Nonserviceable hearing developed in 19% of patients in the losartan group and 28% in the non-losartan group (p = 0.734). Survival analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in the hazard rate of developing nonserviceable hearing between groups (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-5.21; p = 0.337). CONCLUSIONS: Losartan use may not reduce the risk of VS growth or hearing loss during observation. A randomized trial would be ideal to further identify the true effect on growth and hearing.

Survival Outcomes of Temporal Bone Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (TBSCC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis, and optimal treatment for advanced cases is uncertain. Our systematic literature review aimed to assess 5-year survival outcomes for advanced TBSCC across different treatment modalities. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for articles published between January 1989 and June 2023. RESULTS: The review yielded 1229 citations of which 31 provided 5-year survival data for TBSCC. The final analysis included 1289 patients. T classification data was available for 1269 patients and overall stage for 1033 patients. Data for 5-year overall survival (OS) was 59.6%. Five-year OS was 81.9% for T1/2 and 47.5% for T3/4 (P < .0001). OS for T1/T2 cancers did not significantly differ between surgery and radiation (100% vs 81.3%, P = .103). For advanced-stage disease (T3/T4), there was no statistical difference in OS when comparing surgery with postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (OS 50.0%) versus surgery with postoperative radiotherapy (XRT) (OS 53.3%) versus definitive CRT (OS 58.1%, P = .767-1.000). There was not enough data to assess the role of neoadjuvant CRT. CONCLUSION: Most patients will present with advanced-stage disease, and nodal metastasis is seen in nearly 22% of patients. This study confirms the prognostic correlation of the current T classification system. Our results suggest that OS did not differ significantly between surgery and XRT for early stage disease, and combined treatment modalities yield similar 5-year OS for advanced cancers.

Cochlear Implantation After Head and Neck Radiation: A Case Series, Systematic Review, and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if cochlear implant (CI) is safe and effective in patients with radiation therapy (XRT)-induced sensorineural hearing loss and to discuss considerations in this population through a retrospective cohort review, systematic review, and meta-analysis. DATABASES REVIEWED: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all CI cases after head and neck (HN) XRT at our institution, noting intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and hearing outcomes. Change in speech discrimination scores (SDSs) was the primary outcome measure. Systematic review was performed to identify all cases of CI after HNXRT. A meta-analysis was performed to assess SDS change. RESULTS: The retrospective cohort review identified 12 patients who underwent CI after HNXRT. One patient with HN cancer (HNC) and one with central nervous system pathology (CNSP) received bilateral implants. Six had HNC, three had CNSP, and one had Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Eleven had abnormal findings during CI. There were no postoperative complications. Twenty articles with an additional 97 patients were suitable for systematic review inclusion. Of the 109 patients, 67 (61.5%) had HNC and 18 (16.5%) had CNSP. Abnormal intraoperative findings were common (30.3%), most frequently in the mastoid (66.7%). Postoperative complications, including wound dehiscence and infection with some requiring explantation, occurred in 10.1% of patients. Sixty-six patients were included in the meta-analysis. All demonstrated SDS improvement (mean increase, 56.2%). CONCLUSION: Patients with prior HNXRT benefit from CI. Paying careful attention to surgical planning and technique, postoperative care, and patient expectations is imperative, as complications are not uncommon.