Anesthesia during deployment of a military forward surgical unit in low income countries: A register study of 1547 anesthesia cases.

BACKGROUND: Military anesthesia meets unique logistical, technical, tactical, and human constraints, but to date limited data have been published on anesthesia management during military operations. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe and analyze French anesthetic activity in a deployed military setting. METHODS: Between October 2015 and February 2018, all patients managed by Sainte-Anne Military Hospital anesthesiologists deployed in mission were included. Anesthesia management was described and compared with the same surgical procedures in France performed by the same anesthesia team (hernia repair, lower and upper limb surgeries). Demographics, type of surgical procedure, and surgical activity were also described. The primary endpoint was to describe anesthesia management during the deployment of forward surgical teams (FST). The secondary endpoint was to compare anesthesia modalities during FST deployment with those usually used in a military teaching hospital. RESULTS: During the study period, 1547 instances of anesthesia were performed by 11 anesthesiologists during 20 missions, totaling 1237 days of deployment in nine different theaters. The majority consisted of regional anesthesia, alone (43.5%) or associated with general anesthesia (21%). Compared with France, there was a statistically significant increase in the use of regional anesthesia in hernia repair, lower and upper limb surgeries during deployment. The majority of patients were civilians as part of medical support to populations. CONCLUSION: In the context of an austere environment, the use of regional anesthesia techniques predominated when possible. These results show that the training of military anesthetists must be complete, including anesthesia, intensive care, pediatrics, and regional anesthesia.

Forty-minute endovascular aortic occlusion increases survival in an experimental model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock caused by abdominal trauma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility of aortic balloon catheter occlusion in intra-abdominal hemorrhage. METHODS: Effects of transfemoral diaphragmatic aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) have been evaluated in 25 pigs. The animals were submitted to incontrollable hemorrhage by a splenic trauma. Group 1 (n = 9) received fluid resuscitation with normal saline (NS) without aortic occlusion; group 2 (n = 8) underwent 60 minutes ABO and NS. Groups 3 (n = 4) and 4 (n = 4) underwent ABO during 40 minutes and 60 minutes, respectively, NS, and splenectomy. RESULTS: Aortic balloon location was adequate in all animals. ABO increased the portion of 2-hour survivors significantly (7/16 vs. 0/9; p = 0.03). ABO increased mean arterial blood pressures (p < 0.05). There was a significant decrease of bleeding and volume of fluid resuscitation (p < 0.05) in ABO groups. Blood potassium and lactate levels at death were significantly higher in groups 2 and 4 compared with those of the control group: 29 ± 0.54 and 6.08 mmol/L ± 0.44 mmol/L versus 4.16 mmol/L ± 0.35 mmol/L (p < 0.02), and 11.39 mmol/L ± 0.37 mmol/L and 9.59 mmol/L ± 1.19 mmol/L versus 6.43 mmol/L ± 0.57 mmol/L (p < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences between group 3 and the control group: 4.83 mmol/L ± 0.32 mmol/L versus 6.43 mmol/L ± 0.57 mmol/L and 5.2 mmol/L ± 0.13 mmol/L versus 4.16 mmol/L ± 0.35 mmol/L, respectively. At necropsy, there were no significant differences in terms of visceral (bowel and kidney) ischemia between the different experimental groups. CONCLUSION: A 40-minute ABO followed by surgical damage control improved survival in this animal model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock caused by abdominal trauma. ABO could be considered for the management of severe abdominal trauma.