Pay attention: you can fall! The Mini-BESTest scale and the turning duration of the TUG test provide valid balance measures in neurological patients: a prospective study with falls as the balance criterion.

Background: Balance, i.e., the ability not to fall, is often poor in neurological patients and this impairment increases their risk of falling. The Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test (Mini-BESTest), a rating scale, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and gait measures are commonly used to quantify balance. This study assesses the criterion validity of these measures as balance measures. Methods: The probability of being a faller within nine months was used as the balance criterion. The Mini-BESTest, TUG (instrumented with inertial sensors), and walking test were administered before and after inpatient rehabilitation. Multiple and LASSO logistic regressions were used for the analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of the model was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Mobility measure validity was compared with the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results: Two hundred and fourteen neurological patients (stroke, peripheral neuropathy, or parkinsonism) were recruited. In total, 82 patients fell at least once in the nine-month follow-up. The Mini-BESTest (AUC = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.62-0.76), the duration of the TUG turning phase (AUC = 0.69; 0.62-0.76), and other TUG measures were significant faller predictors in regression models. However, only the turning duration (AIC = 274.0) and Mini-BESTest (AIC = 276.1) substantially improved the prediction of a baseline model, which only included fall risk factors from the medical history (AIC = 281.7). The LASSO procedure selected gender, disease chronicity, urinary incontinence, the Mini-BESTest, and turning duration as optimal faller predictors. Conclusion: The TUG turning duration and the Mini-BESTest predict the chance of being a faller. Their criterion validity as balance measures in neurological patients is substantial.

The Role of Working Memory and Short-Term Memory in Sentence Comprehension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Probable Alzheimer's Disease.

The role of either short-term memory (STM) or working memory (WM) in sentence comprehension is a matter of debate. Although it is commonly accepted that memory resources are necessary for sentence comprehension, there is no agreement regarding the nature of their role. The aim of this review is to investigate and synthesize assessment tools and correlation data between STM or WM and sentence comprehension in probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). To this aim, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, and LLBA databases were searched. Two independent authors selected peer-reviewed articles published in English and focused on the relationship between STM or WM and sentence comprehension in probable AD. A total of 11 case-control studies were included at the end of the selection process. Most studies adopted offline tasks to evaluate sentence comprehension, while a small number of authors applied online experimental tasks. The digit span forward and backward were the most employed standardized tests to evaluate phonological STM and WM, respectively. The meta-analysis results supported the association between performance on STM and WM and comprehension tasks. However, moderate heterogeneity was found, mainly due to the small number of included studies, especially for STM, and the substantial variability of the adopted tasks. Therefore, in order to clarify the specific source of language comprehension deficits, new and sophisticated experiments should be conducted using adequate material.

Predicting home discharge after inpatient rehabilitation of stroke patients with aphasia.

The early identification of the discharge setting from Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities is a primary goal in stroke-related research because of its clinical and socio-economic relevance. Several features have been identified as significant predictors of the discharge setting. Within cognitive deficits, aphasia is known to be a common and disabling condition that could influence rehabilitation outcome. However, it is often set as an exclusion criterion in stroke research. This study aims to investigate the predictive power of clinical variables, in particular specific language disturbances and nonlinguistic cognitive deficits, for discharge setting in post-acute stroke patients with aphasia after intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation. In a sample of 158 patients, demographic, motor, language, and nonverbal cognitive data were retrospectively considered for the prediction of the discharge to home vs. another institutional setting. Univariate analysis identified relevant differences between groups and the significant variables were included in a logistic regression model. The results showed that better functional motor status, absence of dysphagia and unimpaired nonlinguistic cognitive profile independently predict the discharge to home. In particular, nonverbal cognitive functioning seemed to be specifically relevant within the aphasic population. The findings could be helpful for setting up the rehabilitation priorities and an adequate discharge arrangement.

Differential Item Functioning of the Mini-BESTest Balance Measure: A Rasch Analysis Study.

The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), a 14-item scale, has high content validity for balance assessment. This study further examines the construct validity of the Mini-BESTest with an emphasis on its measurement invariance. The Mini-BESTest was administered to 292 neurological patients in two sessions (before and after rehabilitation) and evaluated with the Rasch analysis (Many-Facet Rating Scale Model: persons, items, sessions). Categories' order and fit to the model were assessed. Next, maps, dimensionality, and differential item functioning (DIF) were examined for construct validity evaluation. DIF was inspected for several clinically important variables, including session, diagnosis, and assistive devices. Mini-BESTest items had ordered categories and fitted the Rasch model. The item map did not flag severe construct underrepresentation. The dimensionality analysis showed that another variable extraneous to balance affected the score of a few items. However, this multidimensionality had only a modest impact on measures. Session did not cause DIF. DIF for assistive devices affected six items and caused a severe measurement artefact. The measurement artefact caused by DIF for diagnosis was negligible. The Mini-BESTest returns interval measures with robust construct validity and measurement invariance. However, caution should be used when comparing Mini-BESTest measures obtained with and without assistive devices.

The role of verbal short-term memory in complex sentence comprehension: An observational study on aphasia.

BACKGROUND: The comprehension profile of people with agrammatism is a debated topic. Syntactic complexity and cognitive resources, in particular phonological short-term memory (pSTM), are considered as crucial components by different interpretative accounts. AIM: To investigate the interaction of syntactic complexity and of pSTM in sentence comprehension in a group of persons with aphasia with and without agrammatism. METHODS & PROCEDURES: A cohort of 30 participants presenting with aphasia was assessed for syntactic comprehension and for pSTM. A total of 15 presented with agrammatism and 15 had fluent aphasia. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Linear nested mixed-model analyses revealed a significant interaction between sentence type and pSTM. In particular, participants with lower pSTM scores showed a reduced comprehension of centre-embedded object relatives and long coordinated sentences. Moreover, a significant interaction was found between sentence type and agrammatism, with a lower performance for passives within the agrammatic group. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: These results confirm that pSTM is involved in the comprehension of complex structures with an important computational load, in particular coordinated sentences, and long-distance filler gap dependencies. On the contrary, the specific deficit of the agrammatic group with passives is a pure syntactic deficit, with no involvement of pSTM.

[Formula: see text] Post-stroke acquired childhood aphasia. A scoping review.

Aphasia has a great impact on children's lives, with stroke being its most common and studied etiology. However, our knowledge about this disorder is limited, the studies on this topic are sparse, and a consensus regarding its definition is lacking. In particular, the interpretation of this condition varied over time: from the rigid description of the so-called "standard doctrine" to the adoption of adult models for post-stroke aphasia. Therefore, this review provides a critical overview of childhood aphasia after stroke, focusing on its epidemiology, definition, diagnosis, and clinical manifestation. The scoping review approach was adopted, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycInfo databases were searched for related peer-review papers in English. Forty-six records were identified; the majority were single cases and case series, only a few were reviews and observational studies. Epidemiologic data are scarce; a few studies report that aphasia affects about one-third of children post-stroke. Despite terminological differences, there is an overall agreement on the definition of post-stroke aphasia in children as a language disorder acquired after the age of two. Approaches for the diagnosis and evaluation vary widely, including both assessments for developmental language disorders and tests for aphasia in adults. The clinical manifestations described in children are numerous and varied, similar to those found in adults, in contrast with the "standard doctrine." This review highlights the need for further studies to improve the knowledge of this condition, develop validated and specific assessment tools, and standardize clinical management.

Cross-cultural adaptation into Italian and validation of the Frenchay dysarthria assessment - 2.

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive evaluation of dysarthria is required to make an accurate differential diagnosis with other communication disorders and plan effective rehabilitation programs. The Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment-2 (FDA-2) is a valid, reliable and widely used protocol for the assessment of dysarthria. An Italian version of the FDA-2 is currently lacking. AIM: To perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the FDA-2 in Italian and to validate the Italian version of the FDA-2. DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation center. POPULATION: 69 patients with dysarthria and 112 healthy controls. METHODS: The FDA-2 was translated and cross-culturally adapted to Italian. The validation study was carried out in 4 steps: (1) 42 audio-recorded samples of FDA-2 items from 11 patients with dysarthria were independently assessed by 7 speech and language pathologists for interrater reliability and re-assessed after 6 weeks for intrarater reliability; (2) 11 patients were simultaneously assessed by 3 speech and language therapists for interrater reliability of the whole Italian version of the FDA-2 and re-assessed within 24 hours for test-retest reliability; (3) the Italian version of the FDA-2 was administered to 112 healthy volunteers to gain normative data; (4) 49 patients with different types of dysarthria were assessed using the Italian version of the FDA-2, the Therapy Outcome Measure impairment scale and the Robertson Profile for the validity analysis. RESULTS: Interrater and intrarater reliability ranged from good to excellent (ICC >0.75) except for 3 audio-recorded items. The overall protocol demonstrated excellent (ICC >0.9) inter-rater and test-retest reliability for all the sections and the total score. Normative data were gained for 6 age groups. For the validity analysis, a statistically significant difference was found between dysarthric patients and healthy subjects for all sections and the total score. The FDA-2 significantly correlated to the therapy outcome measure (r=0.75) and the Robertson Profile (r=0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of the FDA-2 yield satisfactory reliability and validity, comparable to the psychometric properties of the original version. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Speech and language pathologists can rely on a valid and reliable tool in Italian for the assessment of dysarthria in both clinical and research practice.

The Falls Efficacy Scale International is a valid measure to assess the concern about falling and its changes induced by treatments.

OBJECTIVE: To test with the Rasch analysis the psychometric properties of the Falls Efficacy Scale International, a questionnaire for measuring concern about falling. DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study, before-after rehabilitation. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation. SUBJECTS: A total of 251 neurological patients with balance impairment. INTERVENTIONS: Physiotherapy and occupational therapy aimed at reducing the risk of falling. MAIN MEASURES: Participants (median age, first-third quartile: 74.0, 65.5-80.5 years; stroke and polyneuropathy: 43% and 21% of the sample, respectively) received a balance assessment (Falls Efficacy Scale International included) pre- and post-rehabilitation. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate the Falls Efficacy Scale International. Differential item functioning, which assesses the measures' stability in different conditions (e.g. before vs. after treatment) and in different groups of individuals, was tested for several variables. RESULTS: Patients suffered a moderate balance impairment (Mini-BESTest median score; first-third quartile: 15; 11-19), mild-moderate concern about falling (Falls Efficacy Scale International: 28; 21-37) and motor disability (Functional Independence Measure, motor domain: 70.0; 57.0-76.5). Falls Efficacy Scale International items fitted the Rasch model (range of infit and outfit mean square statistics: 0.8-1.32 and 0.71-1.45, respectively) and the questionnaire's reliability was satisfactory (0.87). No differential item functioning was found for treatment, gender, age and balance impairment. Differential item functioning was found for diagnosis and disability severity, but it is shown that it is not such as to bias measures. CONCLUSIONS: Falls Efficacy Scale International ordinal scores can be turned into interval measures, i.e. measures of the type of temperature. Being differential item functioning-free for treatment, these measures can be safely used to compare concern about falling before and after rehabilitation, such as when interested in assessing the rehabilitation effectiveness.

The McNemar Change Index worked better than the Minimal Detectable Change in demonstrating the change at a single subject level.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the agreement between the Rasch Change Index (RCI), minimal detectable change (MDC), and McNemar Change Index (McCI), three statistics for demonstrating the patient's improvement/deterioration. METHODS: The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest (MB)) (a balance scale developed with the Rasch analysis) was administered before and after rehabilitation to 315 neurological patients. The MB RCI was chosen as the criterion standard for detecting the patient's improvement. Positive likelihood ratios and negative likelihood ratios (PLRs and NLRs, respectively) were used to evaluate the MDC and McCI accuracy in identifying the patient's improvement. Three different MB MDCs were assessed. RESULTS: One-hundred patients improved their MB in accordance with the RCI. All three MDCs and the McCI were solid in ruling out the patient's improvement (NLR <0.2). The McCI and the largest MDC were also good in detecting the patient's improvement (PLR>5), whereas the smaller MDCs were not. Of the four indices, McCI was the most robust in case of missing items. CONCLUSION: A patient stable in accordance with the MDCs or McCI is actually stable as per the criterion standard. To be reasonably sure that the patient is actually improved, larger MDC values or the McCI should be preferred, and the McCI is preferable if there are missing items.

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation of a post-stroke pediatric patient considering the ICF perspective.

PURPOSE: There is a general lack of evidence on the efficacy of rehabilitation training methods after childhood stroke. The aim of the current paper is to provide an example of a multidisciplinary assessment and intensive patient-centered rehabilitation program that was devised following the Clinical Guidelines for Childhood Stroke Diagnosis, Management and Rehabilitation, based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. METHOD: The case of a 13-year-old teenager with physical, linguistic, cognitive and emotional impairments after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in left middle cerebral artery territories is presented and his neurorehabilitation program is described. RESULTS: After an intensive and comprehensive rehabilitation period, the patient showed significant improvement involving language abilities, cognitive flexibility, logical reasoning and motor independence. A 6-month post-stroke follow-up evaluation showed further gains in spontaneous language, improved motivation and collaboration, reduction of impulsiveness and better general motor stability. CONCLUSION: This case highlights how an intensive, patient-centered, interdisciplinary rehabilitation approach can lead to good improvement across different domains, maximizing the spontaneous recovery in children and adolescents after AIS.

Interaction Between Recovery of Motor and Language Abilities After Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the nature of the interaction between motor and language recovery in patients with motor impairment and aphasia following left hemispheric stroke and to investigate prognostic factors of best recovery, that is, the significant recovery of both functions simultaneously. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Specialized inpatient rehabilitation facility. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=435) with left hemispheric stroke in the postacute phase with motor impairment and aphasia. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients who reached the minimal clinically important difference in the motor-FIM (M-FIM) were classified as motor responders, patients who reached a significant change in Aachen Aphasia Test were classified as language responders, and patients who reached a simultaneous and significant improvement in both functions were classified as motor and language responders. RESULTS: Of the sample 45% were motor responders, 58% were language responders, and 35% were motor and language responders. Responder groups showed lower motor impairment and less severe aphasia at admission and greater improvement in both functions at discharge compared with nonresponder groups. Premorbid autonomy, dysphagia, apraxia, and number of rehabilitative sessions were also significantly different between groups. A logistic regression model identified M-FIM, repetition abilities, and number of sessions of speech and language therapy as independent predictors of best response (ie, motor and language responders). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence about a possible interaction between motor and language recovery after stroke. The improvement in one function was never associated with deterioration in the other. The results actually suggest a synergic effect between the amelioration of the 2 functions, with an overall increased efficiency when the 2 recovery pathways are combined.

Predictors of Oral Feeding Resumption after Stroke in a Rehabilitation Hospital: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is common after stroke, requiring exclusive enteral feeding in 20% of patients. Recovery of oral feeding is associated with increased quality of life, better functional outcomes, and decreased mortality rates. However, evidence is heterogeneous and not conclusive on which factors are predictive of oral feeding recovery for stroke patients in rehabilitation units. AIM: To investigate predictors of complete oral feeding recovery. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Intensive inpatient rehabilitation hospital. POPULATION: Poststroke dysphagic individuals with enteral feeding. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of demographic, clinical, rehabilitation, and swallowing factors. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis were used to compare variables between the oral feeding recovery group and the enteral feeding group at discharge. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients were included in the analysis. A total of 61.9% of the sample population resumed complete oral intake at discharge. There were statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in Functional Independence Measure cognitive score, clinical swallow evaluation, and instrumental swallow evaluation at admittance, and dysphagia rehabilitation. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified the absence of aspiration signs with liquids associated with a higher probability of the resumption of complete oral feeding (odds ratio [OR] 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-11.89). Age between 73 and 79 years (OR .96; 95% CI .01-.58), the presence of aspiration and/or penetration (OR .22; 95% CI .07-.72), and the presence of residue (OR .14; 95%CI .04-.43) during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing presented lower probability of returning to complete oral feeding. CONCLUSION: Several demographic and swallowing characteristics predicted oral feeding recovery. Absence of dysphagia signs documented on fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing was the strongest predictor of complete oral feeding resumption.