RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effects of socio-economic deprivation on the oncological outcomes of surgically treated upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. METHODS: From January 1998 to December 2012, 161 patients underwent nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract cancer at our tertiary medical centre. We included 124 patients where complete data were available for further analysis. This study also analysed the impact of the reported risk factors such as grade, stage, multifocality in addition to socio-economic deprivation on the long-term oncological outcomes after nephroureterectomy. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four (77 %) patients with complete data for socio-economic status were analysed in this study. The median age of the cohort was 73 years (interquartile range 45-86). There were 20, 18, 17, 40 and 29 patients in different socio-economic categories ranging from 1 to 5, respectively. The median duration of follow-up was 68 months (9-174). A statistically higher grade (p value 0.005) and higher stage (p value 0.0005) disease was seen in patients from less deprived categories on both univariate and multivariate analyses. The cancer-specific mortality and follow-up recurrences, however, did not significantly differ between the different socio-economic categories on multivariate analysis (p value 0.13; 0.6) and on univariate and multivariate analyses. A higher number of patients with multifocal disease and concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) had disease recurrences which were statistically significant (p values 0.026 and 0.014, respectively) on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A lower recurrence-free survival was observed in patients with multifocal disease and those with concomitant CIS following nephroureterectomy for clinically localized disease. Long-term follow-up did not show any significant differences in cancer-specific survival between different deprivation categories.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia , Classe Social , Neoplasias Ureterais/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Ureterais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ureterais/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A relatively unknown associations exists between the detection, progression and rate of interventions in small renal masses in the context of socioeconomic status. The study explored the impact of socioeconomic status on the detection, progression and intervention rate in SRMs. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A population-based cohort of patients with SRMs was identified using various hospital databases in well-defined geographical area between January 2007 and December 2011. A list of patients with unique 10-digits Community Health Index (CHI) number and their follow-up was recorded on a pre-designed electronic database sheet. Correlation between the socioeconomic status and detection, progression and pattern of interventions of small renal masses was the primary outcome. The postcode of each patient was identified and linked to the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) scoring system, and a deprivation category number assigned to each patient, allowing potential links to become apparent between small renal masses and deprivation. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen patients were diagnosed with small renal masses in 150,820 abdominal imaging carried out in a population of 117,600. The detection of SRMs in relation to SIMD status showed no statistically significant differences across different categories. Similarly, interventions, type of surgery and progression remained unaffected by socioeconomic status. The group on active surveillance showed slow or no-growth at a mean follow-up of more than 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of small renal masses is very small compared with the amount of imaging investigations of abdomen in 5 years in this cohort. Detection, progression and rate of intervention did not differ in different socioeconomic strata of the cohort. The majority of small renal masses on active surveillance did not change or grew in size very slowly when observed over time.