Radiograph prescription practices of dentists in Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND: With the advent of new ionizing radiation technologies, consideration must be given to the use of radiography in clinical practice. The authors aimed to determine how general dentists obtain oral and maxillofacial images and whether dentists' demographic characteristics and practice environments affect imaging decisions. METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study using an electronic survey to collect information from general dentists in Ontario, Canada's most populous province. RESULTS: The authors received 1,332 responses from 9,052 general dentists registered to practice in Ontario. A total of 57.2% of dentists used a nonindividualized approach to obtaining images for new adult dentate patients. Using clinical case scenarios, the authors found that 18.8% through 55.1% of dentists did not follow evidence-based guidelines when obtaining images. Overprescribing imaging was 5.8 times more common than underprescribing. Seeing patients after images were obtained (odds ratio [OR], 5.5), owning a panoramic and a cone-beam computed tomography imaging system (OR, 4.4), and the belief that images should be obtained to screen for occult pathoses (OR, 3.5) were the factors most strongly associated with overprescription. CONCLUSIONS: Radiography prescription practices varied considerably among general dentists in Ontario and did not conform to established guidelines. Factors other than patient needs appeared to influence imaging practices. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Overprescription of imaging by general dentists can result in unnecessary radiation exposure and financial costs to patients. To mitigate this, changes are needed in dental education, continuing education courses, and regulatory requirements.

The use of radiographic imaging technologies by general dentists in Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional digital imaging technologies, the methods used by general dentists to limit patient exposure to ionizing radiation, and the impact of dentists' education on imaging technologies and patient dose-reducing techniques. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional, web-based survey of all general dentists in Ontario was conducted. RESULTS: Responses from 1332 (14.7%) of the 9052 registered general dentists in Ontario were included in the analysis. Approximately 89% reported using digital intraoral technology, 81.1% reported owning panoramic imaging systems, 71.2% reported making referrals for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and 9.5% reported including CBCT in their practices. CBCT was most commonly used for dental implant treatment planning (85.8%), followed by endodontics (45.4%), evaluation of pathology (39.6%), and surgical assessment for impacted teeth or difficult extractions (36.8%). Approximately 32.7% used only collimators with a long focal point-receptor distance and 8% used only rectangular collimation; 86.9% reported using a thyroid collar when imaging patients. Differences in educational backgrounds correlated with differences in the use of imaging and dose-reducing techniques. CONCLUSIONS: There is widespread adoption of digital imaging technologies by general dentists in Ontario, including CBCT. Greater implementation of long and/or rectangular collimation could markedly reduce the ionizing radiation dose to patients. Changes in dental education curricula and continuing education course offerings may address these issues.