Intractable Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Undefined Type of Pancreatic Fistula Managed by Puestow-Like Procedure.

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a very complex and highly challenging operation for surgeons worldwide. It is the surgical procedure of choice for the management of benign and malignant diseases of the periampullary region. Although mortality rate following this complicated surgery has fallen to 1-3%, morbidity rate following PD remains high, with almost 30-40% of patients developing at least one complication. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most common complications following PD. Therefore, Pancreatico-enteric anastomosis has been regarded as the "Achilles heel" of the modern, one-stage PD procedure. According to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS), three types of POPF are recognized nowadays: biochemical leak, previously known as grade A POPF, grade B and grade C, with the latter being the most dangerous. Most POPFs, especially of the biochemical leak and grade B heal with non-operative management to recur later and present as an intra-abdominal abscess or pseudocyst, necessitating management by means of interventional radiology, endoscopy or surgery. These types of fistulas are undefined and occasionally intractable. Herein, we present two patients who presented with the aforementioned type of pancreatic fistula following duct occlusion PD. The first patient, a 53-year-old female patient, suffered from intolerance to oral feeding, severe weight loss and recurrent hospital admission, while the second patient, a 72-year-old patient, suffered from recurrent bouts of abdominal sepsis. Their management involved step-up approach, starting with non-operative management, followed by percutaneous drainage and operative treatment in the form of Puestow-like procedure (longitudinal pancreatojejunostomy), as a recourse due to the inadequacy of preceding therapeutic modalities.

Magnetic resonance imaging for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: can clinical scores predict when imaging is needed?

PURPOSE: Advanced imaging may augment the diagnostic milieux for presumed acute appendicitis (AA) during pregnancy, however it is not clear when such imaging modalities are indicated. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of clinical scoring systems with the findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of AA in pregnant patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study between 2019 and 2021 was performed in two tertiary level centers. Pregnant patients presenting with suspected AA and non-diagnostic trans-abdominal ultrasound who underwent MRI as part of their evaluation were identified. Patient demographics, parity, gestation, presenting signs, and symptoms were documented. The Alvarado and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score for each patient were calculated and correlated with clinical and MRI findings. Univariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with AA on MRI. RESULTS: Of the 255 pregnant patients who underwent MRI, 33 (13%) had findings of AA. On univariate analysis, presentation during the second/third trimester, migration of pain, vomiting and RLQ tenderness correlated with MRI findings of AA. Whilst 5/77 (6.5%) of patients with an Alvarado score ≤4 had signs of AA on MRI, a score of ≥5 had a sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of 84.8%, 36.6%, 94.0% and 17.2%. For an AIR score ≥ 5, this was 78.8%, 41.5%, 93.0%, and 16.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst clinical scoring systems may be useful in identifying which pregnant patients require MRI to be performed when AA is suspected, the low sensitivity implies further research is needed to refine the use of this valuable resource.

Distal Tumor Spread in Rectal Cancer-How Low Should We Go?

BACKGROUND: Distal tumor spread (DTS) is an adverse prognostic factor in rectal cancer correlating with advanced stage disease. We aimed to assess prevalence and location of distal tumor spread and impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients who underwent proctectomy for rectal cancer. METHODS: The pathology database at our institution was queried for all patients who underwent proctectomy with curative intent for rectal cancer from 1/2008 to 12/2016. Specimen slides were re-evaluated by a single expert rectal cancer pathologist to verify diagnosis and measure the distance to the distal resection margin. Main outcome measures were 3-year overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS: 275 consecutive patients were identified. 109/111 patients with clinical stage 3 disease received preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. DTS was found in 13 (4.7%) specimens, 6 with intra-mural and 7 with extra-mural distal tumor spread. DTS was found only in patients with clinical stage 3 disease. Length of DTS from the distal end of the tumor ranged from 0 to 30 mm; in only 4 specimens DTS was >10 mm. A positive distal resection margin was found in 5/275 (1.8%) specimens. CONCLUSION: A macroscopically tumor-free margin may suffice in patients with pre-treatment stage 1 or 2 disease. Furthermore, a 1 cm margin is adequate in most patients with stage 3 disease.

Resection of Extrapulmonary Lymphangiomyoma and Post-Operative Management Considerations.

Background: Lymphangiomyomatosis is a rare disease involving the lymph vessels, causing obstruction and cystic formation with an incidence of 3-8 per million women. The disease might be sporadic or inherited. Lymphangiomyomatosis mostly affects the pulmonary system, whereas extrapulmonary Lymphangiomyomatosis may present in various site, occasionally as a localized abdominal mass. The diagnostic process might entail surgical resection to obtain a specimen for pathology that may also help to achieve a long-term control of the disease. Methods: Herein, we present a case of a 45 years old female, who suffered from pulmonary symptoms, and during her workup an abdominal mass was found. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy with resection of a left retroperitoneal bilobar mass. Results: Histopathological report revealed Lymphangiomyoma. She had a complication of a lymphatic leakage that required a second laparotomy with satisfactory clinical outcome. Conclusions: Surgeons should be aware of the pathological lymphatics and manage post-operative complications by a trial of conservative.

Anorectal Malignancies Presenting as a Perianal Abscess or Fistula.

BACKGROUND: Acute anorectal abscess and fistula are common conditions that usually presents as a painful lump close to the anal margin. Tumors in the distal rectum and in the perianal region may mimic the symptoms and signs of anorectal sepsis, thereby leading to a delay in diagnosis and management. The purpose of this study was to describe patients presenting with acute perianal abscess or fistula who were subsequently diagnosed with anorectal cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, review of all cases presenting with acute perianal abscess or fistula who were subsequently found to have anorectal carcinoma on biopsy in two tertiary centers. We analyzed the data focusing on the clinical features, laboratory values, clinical staging of the tumors, the subsequent management, the pathological staging, and the outcome of each patient. RESULTS: Overall, 3219 patients presenting with anorectal abscess or fistula were reviewed. Cancer was diagnosed in 16 (.5%) patients, 12 with adenocarcinoma of the rectum and 4 with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. In 5 patients (31.2%), cancer was diagnosed in the setting of chronic perianal fistula, 4 of them had Crohn's disease. In 10 patients (62.5%), cancer was not diagnosed during the initial evaluation of the acute symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: A high index of suspicion is required to make the diagnosis of perianal tumors when assessing patients presenting with perianal sepsis, particularly those with Crohn's disease, a long history of persistent perianal disease, and an advanced age. In most cases, proper drainage followed by proximal diversion are the surgical treatment of choice in the acute setting.

A National Inpatient Sample Analysis of Racial Disparities After Segmental Colectomy for Inflammatory Colorectal Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities and poor access to care are common among African Americans (AA), potentially adversely affecting surgical outcomes in inflammatory bowel conditions. We aimed to analyze the effect of race on outcomes in patients undergoing segmental colectomy for inflammatory bowel conditions. METHODS: Retrospective review of data from the National Inpatient Sample between 2010 and 2015 identified patients who underwent segmental colectomy without ostomy for Crohn's or diverticular disease. AA patients were compared with Caucasians using a multivariable analysis model. Primary outcomes of interest were overall complications, mortality, and extended hospital stay. RESULTS: 38,143 admissions were analyzed; AA patients constituted 8% of the overall cohort. Diagnoses included Crohn's (11%) and diverticular disease (89%). After multivariable analysis, AA patients had significantly higher overall risk of complications (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.15-1.40) and extended hospital stay (OR = 1.59; 95% CI, 1.45-1.75) than Caucasians. On bivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in mortality between AA and Caucasian patients. AA patients had significantly higher rates of Medicaid insurance (14% vs 6%, P < .001), lower rates of private insurance (35% vs 47%, P < .001), and were less likely to undergo surgery at a private hospital (31% vs 41%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: AA patients requiring segmental colectomy for inflammatory colorectal conditions experience significantly higher rates of postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, and lower rates of private insurance. Direct correlation between insurance status and postoperative outcomes could not be established, but we speculate such great disparity in outcomes may stem from these socioeconomic differences.

Indications for, and outcomes of, end ileostomy revision procedures.

AIM: Ileostomy complications have been reported in >70% of cases. Older studies have shown ileostomy revision to be required in 23%-38% of patients over a 5-10 year period. There is a paucity of recent data addressing ileostomy revision surgery. We aimed to review end ileostomy revisions in a tertiary centre and analyse indications, procedures performed, outcomes and risks for such surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective review in a single institution colorectal referral practice. All patients aged >17 years who underwent a revision of an ileostomy at our institution from 2008 to 2019 were included. Indication for ileostomy revision, operative technique (parastomal vs. intra-abdominal) and outcomes including length of stay, readmission rates, wound complications, medical complications and rate of stoma re-revision were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients who underwent 72 end ileostomy revision procedures were included; 20 (27.8%) were re-revision procedures. The majority (76.4%) had their original ileostomy created for inflammatory bowel disease. Indications for ileostomy revision were stoma retraction (36.1%), prolapse (22.2%), stenosis (18.1%) and parastomal hernia (29.2%). Of stoma revisions, 55.6% were performed by a parastomal approach vs. 44.4% by an intra-abdominal approach. Procedures were a combination of laparotomy, laparoscopy or both. The average length of stay was statistically significantly lower in the parastomal approach revision group (2.3 days) compared to the intra-abdominal approach revision group (10.3 days) (P < 0.001). Readmission and wound complication rates were 6.9% and 15.3%, respectively, in the intra-abdominal approach group alone. Medical complication rates were 20.8%. CONCLUSIONS: End ileostomy complications are common and surgical treatment may result in significant morbidity, readmission and reoperation. Patients should be counselled about these possibilities.

Initial Experience with Transition from Open to Robotic-assisted Proctectomy for Patients with Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The learning curve for transition from open to laparoscopic proctectomies is difficult. Most surgeons have considerable laparoscopic experience prior to performing robotic-assisted procedures. There are data regarding the transition from open to robotic proctectomies. Minimally invasive anterior resection for rectal cancer has gained widespread popularity in recent years, especially when using a robotic platform. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the experience to the transition from open to robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a computerized database. All patients who had a robotic-assisted proctectomy between December 2016 and March 2019 were included and were compared to patients who underwent an open anterior resection in the same time period. A single experienced colorectal surgeon with no prior experience in colorectal laparoscopic surgery performed the procedures. RESULTS: During the study period, 55 patients underwent robotic-assisted proctectomy and 55 had an open proctectomy. Patients had similar pre-operative demographic and clinical characteristics with the majority of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The surgical time was significantly lower in the open surgery group (168 minutes vs. 310 minutes, P = 0.005). Both the surgical and pathological outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups, with good short-term oncologic outcomes and low complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: The transition from open to robotic-assisted proctectomy is feasible and safe and provides a good alternative for undertaking a minimally invasive surgery for the experienced open colorectal surgeon.

Management of Adult Intussusception-A Case Series Experience from a Tertiary Center.

BACKGROUND: The management of intussusception is controversial. Clinical presentation, with the aid of imaging modalities, enables a better selection of patients for the appropriate treatment algorithm. Conservative management versus surgical intervention with bowel resection is considered accordingly. METHODS: Retrospective review of a computerized database of patients who were admitted with intussusception between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020, in a single tertiary center in Israel. Patients who were treated conservatively were compared to those who underwent surgery. Patients who underwent bowel resection were compared to those that had surgery without a resection. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were diagnosed with intussusception, and 49 were operated. Bowel resection was performed in 32 cases. 20/76(26%) were successfully managed conservatively. Patients with a lead point (OR = 5.59) and colonic involvement (OR = 13.72) had a higher likelihood for resection. The likelihood of bowel resection was found to be significantly lower with proximal small bowel intussusception (OR = 0.071). CONCLUSION: Young patients presenting with intussusception may be treated conservatively when adequate criteria are met in order to avoid unnecessary surgical interventions.

Perineal reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal resection: Differences among minimally invasive, open, or open with a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap approaches.

BACKGROUND: Perineal wound complications after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for cancer are common with no consensus on optimal reconstructive technique. We compared short- and long-term results of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with open surgery ± vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective observational study of 204 consecutive patients with advanced low rectal cancer who underwent extralevator abdominoperineal resection from January 2010 to August 2020. Main outcome measures were short-term results, wound complications, and incisional, parastomal, and perineal hernia rates. RESULTS: Fifty-five (27%) patients had a laparoscopic approach, 80 (39%) open, and 69 (33%) open + vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. The groups had similar median length of follow up (P = .75). Patients' age and radiation, intraoperative and postoperative complications, mortality, and readmission rates were similar among the 3 groups. Perineal wound infection and dehiscence rates were not influenced by surgical approach. Laparoscopy resulted in higher perineal (7.3 vs 2.5 vs 0%; P = .047) and parastomal (23.6 vs 13.8 vs 5.8%; P = .016) hernia rates than did open or open + vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Patients who underwent an open approach had a higher body mass index and rate of prior surgeries and preoperative ostomies. Laparoscopic and open approaches had significantly shorter operative times (300 vs 303 vs 404 minutes, respectively; P < .001) and shorter length of stay (7.6 vs 10.8 vs 11.12, respectively; P = .006) compared to open with a flap approach. CONCLUSION: Open and open + vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap approaches for reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection had lower parastomal and perineal hernias rates but similar postoperative morbidity as did the laparoscopic approach.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Days of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common emergencies treated by general surgeons. The treatment of choice in the majority of cases is laparoscopic appendectomy. In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a concern for a delayed referral of patients and thus a more advanced presentation of the disease leading to a prolonged and complicated course. METHODS: Retrospective review of a computerized database of patients who were admitted with acute appendicitis and underwent laparoscopic appendectomy during the COVID pandemic in a single tertiary center in Israel. Patients were compared with those who were admitted and operated for appendicitis in the same period in the previous year. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy in the study period in 2020, compared with 109 who had surgery in 2019. During the COVID pandemic 41 patients presented with complicated appendicitis versus 22 patients in 2019 (P=0.0174). The placement of peritoneal drains was more prevalent during the pandemic, 5.5% versus 11.4%, and the use of stapler device for appendicular stump closure (P=0.0105). CONCLUSIONS: During the first stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a significant increase in the rate of complicated appendicitis. Patients should be strongly encouraged not to refrain from medical treatment and go to the emergency room with the persistence of symptoms.

Gracilis Muscle Interposition for Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula: Experience With 119 Consecutive Patients.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of complex anal fistula is challenging, often mandating multiple procedures. The gracilis muscle has been used to treat perineal fistulas and to repair perineal defects. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to report the results of gracilis muscle interposition for complex anal fistula, including prognostic factors for success. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective database for patients who underwent gracilis muscle interposition for complex anal fistula from 2000 to 2018. SETTING: Patient demographics, operative data, and postoperative outcome were obtained from medical records. Office visits were used for follow-up. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent gracilis muscle interposition for complex anal fistula were included. Patients who underwent gracilis muscle interposition for reasons other than complex anal fistula were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the healing of complex anal fistula following gracilis muscle interposition and following additional procedures, when needed. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients (60 men, 59 women; median age: 56 (21-85) years) were included. The initial success rate of gracilis muscle interposition was 42%; the final success rate if additional procedures were undertaken was 92%. Overall success rate was 32.2% in women and 51.6% in men. Univariate analysis revealed that sex (p = 0.0315) and bed rest >3 days (p = 0.0078) were significant poor prognostic factors for failure, whereas the multivariate logistic regression model showed that length of bed rest >3 days was a significant poor prognostic factor for failure. In the female subgroup, multivariate analysis showed that bed rest ≥3 days was a significant poor prognostic factor, whereas in the male population there was no significant prognostic factor. LIMITATION: This study was limited by its retrospective nature and the heterogeneity of patients. CONCLUSION: Although initial success is <50%, the ultimate success after gracilis muscle interposition and other subsequent procedures is >90%. Patients must be preoperatively counseled that additional procedures will probably be required to achieve successful fistula closure. Furthermore, prolonged bed rest should be avoided after gracilis muscle interposition. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B551. INTERPOSICIN DEL MSCULO GRACILIS PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DE LA FSTULA ANAL COMPLEJA EXPERIENCIA CON PACIENTES CONSECUTIVOS: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento de la fístula anal compleja es un desafío que a menudo requiere de múltiples procedimientos quirúrgicos. El músculo gracilis se ha utilizado para tratar fístulas y reparar defectos perineales.OBJETIVO:Informar los resultados de la interposición del músculo gracilis para la fístula anal compleja, incluyendo los factores pronósticos para un tratamiento exitoso.DISEÑO:Se efectuó un análisis retrospectivo obtenido de una base de datos prospectiva para pacientes sometidos a interposición del músculo gracilis por fístula anal compleja del 2000 al 2018.METODO:Los datos demográficos de los pacientes, la información del procedimiento quirúrgico y los resultados postoperatorios se obtuvieron de los expedientes clínicos; el seguimiento se llevó a cabo por medio de visitas al consultorio.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes sometidos a interposición del músculo gracilis por fístula anal compleja; Se excluyeron los pacientes que se sometieron a interposición del músculo gracilis por motivos distintos a la fístula anal compleja.CRITERIOS DE EVALUACION DE LOS RESULTADOS:Curación de una fístula anal compleja después de la interposición del músculo gracilis y procedimientos adicionales, cuando fueron necesarios.RESULTADOS:Se estudiaron un total de 119 pacientes [60 hombres, 59 mujeres; con media de edad de 56 (21-85) años]. La tasa de éxito inicial de la interposición del músculo gracilis fue del 42%; La tasa de éxito final cuando realizaron procedimientos adicionales fue del 92%. La tasa de éxito global fue del 32,2% en mujeres y del 51,6% en hombres. El análisis univariado reveló que el género (p = 0,0315) y el reposo en cama > 3 días (p = 0,0078) en forma significativa fueron factores de pronóstico bajo para el fracaso, mientras que el modelo de regresión logística multivariable mostró que la duración del reposo en cama> 3 días fue un factor de pronóstico significativamente bajo para fracaso. En el subgrupo de mujeres, el análisis multivariado mostró que el reposo en cama ≥3 días fue un factor de pronóstico significativamente bajo, mientras que en la población masculina no hubo un factor pronóstico significativo.LIMITACIÓN:Carácter retrospectivo y heterogenicidad de los pacientes.CONCLUSIÓN:Aunque el éxito inicial es <50%, el éxito final después de la interposición del músculo gracilis y otros procedimientos posteriores es > 90%. Se debe aconsejar a los pacientes antes de la operación que probablemente se requieran procedimientos adicionales para lograr el cierre exitoso de la fístula. Además, debe evitarse el reposo prolongado en cama después de la interposición del músculo gracilis. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B551.

Isolated Type Immunoglobulin G4 Sclerosing Cholangitis: The Misdiagnosed Cholangiocarcinoma.

Immunoglobulin G4 sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC), firstly described in 2004, is the biliary manifestation of a recently described multisystem immune-mediated disease known as IgG4-related disease. IgG4-SC is a unique and rare type of cholangitis of unknown etiology and its precise prevalence rate is still unclear. It is characterized by bile duct wall thickening and high levels of systemic serum IgG4 plasma cells. Differential diagnoses for IgG4-SC include benign (primary sclerosing cholangitis) as well as malignant (extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma) diseases. Discrimination between these entities is very important, due to the fact that they have different biological behaviors and different therapeutic strategies. The rare IgG4-SC subgroup with its puzzling manifestations carries a hefty diagnostic challenge for the treating physicians, and inaccurate diagnosis can lead to unnecessary morbid surgical procedures. With the paucity and relative weakness of available data in the current literature, one needs to carefully review all available parameters. A low threshold of suspicion is required to try and prevent missing IgG4-SC. IgG4-SC is highly responsive to steroid treatment, especially during the early inflammatory phase, while delay in management could lead to fibrosis and organ dysfunction. On the other hand, cholangiocarcinoma is treated by means of surgery and/or chemotherapeutic agents.

Early postoperative outcomes of diverting loop ileostomy closure surgery following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) formation reduces the consequences of anastomotic leak and may also decrease the incidence of this severe complication, DLI closure can result in significant complications. The laparoscopic approach in colorectal surgery has numerous benefits, including reduced length of stay (LOS), less wound infection, and better cosmesis. The aim of this study was to determine whether a laparoscopic approach at the time of the ileostomy creation has a beneficial effect on the outcomes of ileostomy closure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of an IRB-approved prospective database was performed for all patients who underwent DLI closure between 2010 and 2017. Patients' demographics, operative reports, and postoperative course were reviewed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software and included descriptive statistics, Chi-square for categorical variables, and Student's t tests for continuous variables. Skewed variables were compared using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Regression analysis for overall complications and LOS were preformed to further assess the impact of laparoscopy. RESULTS: We identified 795 patients (363 females) who underwent DLI reversal surgery. The surgical approach in the index operation was laparoscopy in 65% of patients. Conversion to laparotomy at the ileostomy closure occurred in 6.1% of patients. The overall complication rate was lower and the LOS was shorter for patients who underwent DLI closure following laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopy at the index operation was also associated with a lower incidence of postoperative ileus and a lower estimated blood loss (EBL) at the time of DLI reversal. Multivariate regression analysis found laparoscopy to have significant benefits compared to laparotomy for overall complications and for LOS. CONCLUSION: Ileostomy closure following laparoscopic colorectal surgery offers benefits including reductions in LOS and overall complications.

Re-operation surgery following IPAA: is there a role for laparoscopy?

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for mucosal ulcerative colitis and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Some patients require re-operation, including pouch revision, advancement, or excision. Re-operative procedures are technically demanding and usually performed only by experienced colorectal surgeons in a small number of referral centers. There is a paucity of data regarding feasibility, safety, and outcomes of laparoscopic re-operative IPAA surgery. This study aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic approach for re-operative IPAA, trans-abdominal surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of IRB-approved prospective database for patients who underwent trans-abdominal re-operative IPAA from 2011 to 2018. Patient demographics and operative reports were reviewed to classify type of re-operation into pouch excision, revision, or advancement and further classify as laparoscopic, laparoscopic converted to open, or open surgery. Main outcome measures were post-operative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients met the inclusion criteria: 19 underwent attempted laparoscopic re-operative IPAA surgery, 12 of whom underwent successful laparoscopic surgery while 7 were converted to laparotomy, for an overall laparoscopic intent to treat 63% success rate. The remaining operations (n = 57) were performed through midline laparotomy. Length of stay (LOS) for patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery was significantly shorter (5.5 vs 9.7 days, p < 0.001) as were abdominal superficial surgical site infections (SSI) (0% vs 18%, p < 0.001) and deep SSI (0% vs 17%, p < 0.001). Laparotomy was performed by 6 colorectal surgeons at our institution while laparoscopy was successfully performed only by the senior author. There was no significant difference in overall complications, re-admission, re-operation, or mortality. CONCLUSION: Re-operative, trans-abdominal, laparoscopic IPAA is both feasible and safe and has clear benefits compared to laparotomy in terms of LOS and superficial and deep SSI. However, this approach needs to be undertaken only by very experienced, high-volume laparoscopic IPAA surgeons.

Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: Preliminary Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Administration of chemotherapeutic regimens such as FOLFOX or CAPEOX with chemoradiation in the neoadjuvant setting, termed total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT), was introduced in recent years. By increasing the complete pathologic and clinical responses, patients with locally advanced rectal cancer may have better oncologic outcomes and potentially abstain from undergoing a proctectomy. METHODS: All patients who underwent TNT at a single National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accredited referral center were included. A retrospective analysis was performed using a computerized Institutional Review Board-approved database. Patient demographics, diagnostic workup, treatment regimens, and surgical and pathological reports were reviewed. Complete pathological response was the primary outcome. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential factors predisposing to complete pathological response. RESULTS: Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria, 14(46.6%) of whom had complete pathologic response. There was no difference in baseline demographic characteristics between patients who achieved complete pathological response and those who did not. Pathology revealed a 92% intact mesorectum rate in the complete pathologic response group and a mean of 24 harvested lymph nodes in the entire study cohort. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses failed to demonstrate statistically significant factors predicting complete pathologic response, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tumor size, and posttreatment MRI lymph node positivity. CONCLUSION: TNT is safe and efficient for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. It increases complete pathological and clinical response rates and may more widely evolve to be the treatment of choice in this group of patients in the near future.