The Creation of a Biocontainment Unit at a Tertiary Care Hospital. The Johns Hopkins Medicine Experience.

In response to the 2014-2015 Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa, Johns Hopkins Medicine created a biocontainment unit to care for patients infected with Ebola virus and other high-consequence pathogens. The unit team examined published literature and guidelines, visited two existing U.S. biocontainment units, and contacted national and international experts to inform the design of the physical structure and patient care activities of the unit. The resulting four-bed unit allows for unidirectional flow of providers and materials and has ample space for donning and doffing personal protective equipment. The air-handling system allows treatment of diseases spread by contact, droplet, or airborne routes of transmission. An onsite laboratory and an autoclave waste management system minimize the transport of infectious materials out of the unit. The unit is staffed by self-selected nurses, providers, and support staff with pediatric and adult capabilities. A telecommunications system allows other providers and family members to interact with patients and staff remotely. A full-time nurse educator is responsible for staff training, including quarterly exercises and competency assessment in the donning and doffing of personal protective equipment. The creation of the Johns Hopkins Biocontainment Unit required the highest level of multidisciplinary collaboration. When not used for clinical care and training, the unit will be a site for research and innovation in highly infectious diseases. The lessons learned from the design process can inform a new research agenda focused on the care of patients in a biocontainment environment.

Electronic-eye faucets: Legionella species contamination in healthcare settings.

OBJECTIVE: To compare heterotrophic plate counts (HPCs) and Legionella species growth from electronic and manual faucet water samples. DESIGN: Proportions of water samples with growth and colony-forming units were compared using Fisher's exact test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, respectively. SETTING: Two psychiatric units and 1 medical unit in a 1,000-bed university hospital. METHODS: Water samples were collected from 20 newly installed electronic faucets and 20 existing manual faucets in 3 hospital units. Manual faucets were located in rooms adjacent to the electronic faucets and received water from the same source. Water samples were collected between December 15, 2008, and January 29, 2009. Four electronic faucets were dismantled, and faucet components were cultured. Legionella species and HPC cultures were performed using standard methods. RESULTS: Nearly all electronic faucets (19/20 [95%]) grew Legionella species from at least 1 water sample, compared with less than half (9/20 [45%]) of manual faucets ([Formula: see text]). Fifty-four (50%) of 108 electronic faucet water cultures grew Legionella species, compared with 11 (15%) of 75 manual faucet water cultures ([Formula: see text]). After chlorine dioxide remediation, 4 (14%) of 28 electronic faucet and 1 (3%) of 30 manual faucet water cultures grew Legionella species ([Formula: see text]), and 8 (29%) electronic faucet and 2 (7%) manual faucet cultures had significant HPC growth ([Formula: see text]). All 12 (100%) of the internal faucet components from 2 electronic faucets grew Legionella species. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic faucets were more commonly contaminated with Legionella species and other bacteria and were less likely to be disinfected after chlorine dioxide remediation. Electronic faucet components may provide points of concentrated bacterial growth.