Prevalence and prognostic impact of cachexia among older patients with cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional survey (NutriAgeCancer).

BACKGROUND: Nutritional impairment is common in cancer patients and is associated with poor outcomes. Only few studies focused on cachexia. We assessed the prevalence of cachexia in older cancer patients, identified associated risk factors, and evaluated its impact on 6 month overall mortality. METHODS: A French nationwide cross-sectional survey (performed in 55 geriatric oncology clinics) of older cancer patients aged ≥70 referred for geriatric assessment prior to treatment choice and initiation. Demographic, clinical, and nutritional data were collected. The first outcome was cachexia, defined as loss of more than 5% of bodyweight over the previous 6 months, or a body mass index below 20 kg/m2 with weight loss of more than 2%, or sarcopenia (an impaired Strength, Assistance with walking, Rise from chair, Climb stairs and Falls score) with weight loss of more than 2%. The second outcome was 6 month overall mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1030 patients included in the analysis [median age (interquartile range): 83 (79-87); males: 48%; metastatic cancer: 42%; main cancer sites: digestive tract (29%) and breast (16%)], 534 [52% (95% confidence interval: 49-55%)] had cachexia. In the multivariate analysis, patients with breast (P < 0.001), gynaecologic (P < 0.001), urinary (P < 0.001), skin (P < 0.001), and haematological cancers (P = 0.006) were less likely to have cachexia than patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancers (including liver and pancreatic cancers; P = 0.052), with previous surgery for cancer (P = 0.001), with metastases (P = 0.047), poor performance status (≥2; P < 0.001), low food intake (P < 0.001), unfeasible timed up-and-go test (P = 0.002), cognitive disorders (P = 0.03) or risk of depression (P = 0.005), were more likely to have cachexia. At 6 months, 194 (20.5%) deaths were observed. Cachexia was associated with 6 month mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-2.11) independently of age, in/outpatient status, cancer site, metastatic status, cancer treatment, dependency, cognition, and number of daily medications. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of older patients with cancer managed in geriatric oncology clinics had cachexia. The factors associated with cachexia were upper gastrointestinal tract cancer, metastases, poor performance status, poor mobility, previous surgery for cancer, cognitive disorders, a risk of depression, and low food intake. Cachexia was independently associated with 6 month mortality.

The obesity paradox for mid- and long-term mortality in older cancer patients: a prospective multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity are associated with adverse health outcomes. However, substantial literature suggests that they are associated with longer survival among older people. This "obesity paradox" remains controversial. In the context of cancer, the association between overweight/obesity and mortality is complicated by concomitant weight loss (WL). Sex differences in the relation between BMI (in kg/m2) and survival have also been observed. OBJECTIVES: We studied whether a high BMI was associated with better survival, and whether the association differed by sex, in older patients with cancer. METHODS: We studied patients aged ≥70 y from the ELCAPA (Elderly Cancer Patients) prospective open cohort (2007-2016; 10 geriatric oncology clinics, Greater Paris urban area). The endpoints were 12- and 60-mo mortality. We created a variable combining BMI at cancer diagnosis and WL in the previous 6 mo, and considered 4 BMI categories-underweight (BMI < 22.5), normal weight (BMI = 22.5-24.9), overweight (BMI = 25-29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥ 30)-and 3 WL categories-<5% (minimal), 5% to <10% (moderate), and ≥10% (severe). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted in men and women. RESULTS: A total of 2071 patients were included (mean age: 81 y; women: 48%; underweight: 30%; normal weight: 23%; overweight: 33%; obesity: 14%; predominant cancer sites: colorectal (18%) and breast (16%); patients with metastases: 49%). By multivariate analysis, obese women with WL < 5% had a lower 60-mo mortality risk than normal-weight women with WL < 5% (adjusted HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.86; P = 0.012). Overweight/obese women with WL ≥ 5% did not have a lower mortality risk than normal-weight women with WL < 5%. Overweight and obese men did not have a lower mortality risk, irrespective of WL. CONCLUSIONS: By taking account of prediagnosis WL, only older obese women with cancer with minimal WL had a lower mortality risk than their counterparts with normal weight.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02884375.

Depressive Symptom Profiles and Survival in Older Patients with Cancer: Latent Class Analysis of the ELCAPA Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The expression of depressive symptoms in older people with cancer is heterogeneous because of specific features of age or cancer comorbidity. We aimed to identify depressive symptom profiles in this population and describe the associated features including survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients ≥70 years who were referred to geriatric oncology clinics were prospectively included in the ELCAPA study. In this subanalysis, depressive symptoms were used as indicators in a latent class analysis. Multinomial multivariable logistic regression and Cox models examined the association of each class with baseline characteristics and mortality. RESULTS: For the 847 complete-case patients included (median age, 79 years; interquartile range, 76-84; women, 47.9%), we identified five depressive symptom classes: "no depression/somatic only" (38.8%), "no depression/pauci-symptomatic" (26.4%), "severe depression" (20%), "mild depression" (11.8%), and "demoralization" (3%). Compared with the no depression/pauci-symptomatic class, the no depression/somatic only and severe depression classes were characterized by more frequent comorbidities with poorer functional status and higher levels of inflammation. "Severe" and "mild" depression classes also featured poorer nutritional status, more medications, and more frequent falls. Severe depression was associated with poor social support, inpatient status, and increased risk of mortality at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.62, 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.48) and 3 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.10). CONCLUSION: A data-driven approach based on depressive symptoms identified five different depressive symptom profiles, including demoralization, in older patients with cancer. Severe depression was independently and substantially associated with poor survival. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Older patients with cancer present with distinct profiles of depressive symptomatology, including different severity levels of depression and the demoralization syndrome. Clinicians should use a systematic assessment of depressive symptoms to adequately highlight these distinct profiles. Geriatric and oncological features are differently associated with these profiles. For instance, severe depression was associated with more frequent comorbidities with poorer functional, poor nutritional status, polypharmacy, frequent falls, inpatient status and poor social support. Also, severe depression was independently and substantially associated with poor survival so that the identification and management of depression should be considered a high priority in this population.

How to Optimize Cancer Treatment in Older Patients: An Overview of Available Geriatric Tools.

Cancer is a disease of older people, but this age group has often been excluded from clinical trials of cancer, which leads to poor transportability of standardized treatments in older cancer patients. One of the main reasons for the exclusion is the heterogeneity of older people in several domains: social environment, comorbidities, dependency, functional status, nutritional status, cognition status, and mood status. Comprehensive geriatric assessment aims to assess this heterogeneity and has identified frequent health problems often unknown before therapeutic decisions, which allows for targeted geriatric interventions with or without follow-up and appropriate cancer treatment selection. Several tools and scores have been developed for a complementary approach. These tools have the following characteristics: they screen for vulnerability to select patients who may benefit from a comprehensive geriatric assessment; are predictive tools for survival, postoperative complications, or chemotherapy-related toxicity; are decisional algorithms for cancer treatment; or define a core set of geriatric data to be collected in clinical cancer trials. Here, we present an overview of the geriatric tools that were published in PubMed from 2000 to 2017, that could help in the therapeutic decision-making for older cancer patients.

[Geriatric assessment and prognostic scores in older cancer patient: Additional support to the therapeutic decision?] / L'évaluation gériatrique et les scores pronostiques chez le patient âgé atteint de cancer : une aide à la décision thérapeutique ?

Cancer is a disease of the elderly as demonstrated by the epidemiological evolution of Western countries. Indeed, two third of cancers newly diagnosed occur over 65 years. However, older cancer patients have been often excluded from clinical trials in oncology and the extrapolation of cancer treatments in this population remains difficult in practice. Scientific societies recommend that a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) be performed in patients aged 70 and over and selected using screening tools for frailty such as the G8 index. The CGA allows to detect aging-related vulnerabilities in various domains (comorbidities, polypharmacy, autonomy, nutrition, mobility, cognition, mood, social) and associated with adverse outcomes during cancer treatment (reduced overall survival, perioperative complications, toxicity-related chemotherapy). The CGA is allow to elaborate a personalized treatment plan in geriatric oncology. However, to date, no algorithms based on CGA is validated to guide therapeutic decision in geriatric oncology. The collaboration between geriatrician and oncologist remains essential to elaborate an appropriate therapeutic strategy and limit the situations of over- and under-treatment. This article presents the set of tools and scores used in geriatric oncology to guide the therapeutic decision.

Preferences about information and decision-making among older patients with and without cancer.

Background: information of older patients with cancer is crucial to ensure optimal care. Objectives: to compare older patients with and without cancer regarding their preferences about medical information, decision-making and surrogate designation. Design: an intention-to-act questionnaire was completed by patients ≥70 y enroled in the ELderly CAncer PAtients cohort between January and June 2013 and by patients in the same age group enroled in a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2005 in acute geriatric wards. Setting: Henri-Mondor Teaching Hospital in the Paris conurbation, France. Results: the group with cancer had 133 patients [mean age, 79.6 ± 6.5 y; 54.9% women]. The main tumour sites were colorectal [24.1%], breast [23.3%] and prostate [15.8%]; 34.8% had metastases. All these patients wanted full information, 74.2% wanted to participate in decisions about their care, 87.2% would designate a family member to serve as a surrogate in life-threatening situations and 15% had already designated a surrogate. Compared to patients without cancer, those with cancer more often wanted to receive information in a life-threatening situation [93.6% versus 79.2%; P < 0.001]. Factors independently associated with patients wanting their informed consent to be obtained for all interventions were having children [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.24; 3.66; P = 0.006], higher Mini Mental State Examination score [aORper point, 1.09; 1.02; 1.17], younger age in the group without cancer [aOR>82 y vs. ≤82 y, 0.50; 0.29-0.88] and being cancer-free [≤82 y, aOR, 0.30; 0.14-0.63; >82 y, aOR, 0.41; 0.17-0.97]. Conclusion: older patients with cancer expressed a strong preference for receiving information and participating in decisions about their care.

Association of chylothorax and direct pleura involvement in a case of Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia.

An 82-year-old male was hospitalised for dyspnoea, hypoxaemia and general fatigue; a predominant left chylothorax was revealed. Previously, he had been diagnosed with Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia (WM). Chylothorax complications in patients with WM are rare events and only six such cases have so far been reported. The most common malignant causes of chylothorax are through mediastinal adenopathy. Direct infiltration of the pleura by tumour cells is the most likely cause with this patient, and for this reason, we believe that this case is an instructive one. Chemotherapy induced rapid and persistent improvement after 10-month follow-up.

Physicians' perceptions of cancer care for elderly patients: a qualitative sociological study based on a pilot geriatric oncology program.

The aim of this study was to document physicians' perceptions of cancer care for elderly patients within an oncogeriatric coordination pilot unit (UPCOG) created in Paris, France. We focused on how physicians apply new cancer care practices, how they establish new teamwork, and their experience of oncogeriatrics in everyday practice. Qualitative methods were used, including a literature review, observation of working sessions in the oncogeriatric pilot unit, and semi-structured interviews with 28 physicians. The results show how physicians' differing perceptions of geriatric oncology can hinder routine collaboration.

Loss of autonomy among elderly patients after a stay in a medical intensive care unit (ICU): a randomized study of the benefit of transfer to a geriatric ward.

In order to evaluate changes in the functional autonomy of elderly patients after a stay in a medical intensive care unit (ICU), and the impact of post-ICU management in geriatric ward, we included in a randomized controlled trial 45 patients aged>or=75 years. They were assessed for functional autonomy before ICU stay, just after ICU discharge, just after hospital discharge, and 6 months later. The patients were randomly divided into two post-ICU management groups: "geriatric ward" and "standard care". Autonomy was usually recovered rapidly, but the degree of recovery depended on the patient's previous autonomy (p<0.0001). At the last assessment, 41% of the patients had recovered their previous autonomy. The mean Barthel indexes were 81.5+/-30.4 in the geriatric management arm and 70.5+/-33.4 in the standard management arm (p=0.4). The study was prematurely ended due to insufficient recruitment flow. These results underline the rapid loss of autonomy after a stay in a medical ICU. Early specific intervention to improve the autonomy of elderly patients seems an attractive solution that could be assessed by randomized controlled trial. Above all, our results should also serve as a basis for further controlled randomized studies in this setting.

Clinical usefulness in geriatric patients of combining CHADS2 and HEMORR2HAGES scores to guide antithrombotic prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Two scores exist to assess the benefits and risks of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: CHADS2 [for Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age over 75, Diabetes mellitus; and 2 points for a history of Stroke] and HEMORR2HAGES [for Hepatic or renal failure, Ethanol abuse, Malignancy, Older (age over 75), Reduced platelet count or function, 2 points for Rebleeding risk Hypertension (uncontrolled), Anemia, Genetic factors, Excessive fall risk (including neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders) and history of Stroke]. The potential value of using both scores routinely was studied in order to guide the choice of antithrombotic therapy for geriatric patients. METHODS: Retrospective calculation of CHADS2 and HEMORR2HAGES scores and discharge treatment were collected for all patients with atrial fibrillation during a six-month period. All files were analysed when there were differences between therapeutic choices and the results of analysis of combining the two scores. RESULTS: 83 patients were identified. Their mean age was 89.2±4.9 years and 30% of them were on oral anticoagulants on discharge. Usual prescription habits of oral anticoagulants correlated strongly with each of the scores and with the difference between the two scores. The clinical usefulness of using the two scores seemed poor since they indicated that two-thirds of the patients had a similar risk of hemorrhagic and ischemic events. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this preliminary study, the CHADS2 and HEMORR2HAGES scores are associated with the prescription of oral anticoagulants, but their routine use may not significantly change the choice of antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.

[Antibiotics given subcutaneously to elderly]. / Antibiotiques par voie sous-cutanée chez la personne âgée.

AIM: To find out data of antibiotics efficiency and tolerance given subcutaneously (SC) to elderly. METHOD: A literature review based on subcutaneous route of antibiotic has been done in PubMed and Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Seventeen studies about ten antibiotics have been selected. According to HAS recommendations, methodology of these articles is poor: 3 are level B and 14 level C. Only amikacin, ceftriaxon and thiamphenicol have an official mention about SC route. Our literature review indicates that other antibiotics have been injected by SC route sometimes with local complication: gentamicin, netilmicin, tobramycin, sisomicin, cefepim, ampicillin, teicoplanin and ertapenem. Aminoside SC administration seems to be contra-indicated in clinical practice because of skin necrosis. However for other antibiotics, studies reveal poor evidence-based medicine and non specific geriatric patient inclusion. For these reasons, SC route for elderly isn't recommended. CONCLUSION: Antibiotics given SC are little documented despite the great interest for elderly. Reasons of administration are often non official mention engaging prescriber responsibility.

Does a geriatric oncology consultation modify the cancer treatment plan for elderly patients?

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to describe the treatment plan modifications after a geriatric oncology clinic. Assessment of health and functional status and cancer assessment was performed in older cancer patients referred to a cancer center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2004 and May 2005, 105 patients 70 years old or older referred to a geriatric oncology consultation at the Institut Curie cancer center were included. Functional status, nutritional status, mood, mobility, comorbidity, medication, social support, and place of residence were assessed. Oncology data and treatment decisions were recorded before and after this consultation. Data were analyzed for a possible correlation between one domain of the assessment and modification of the treatment plan. RESULTS: Patient characteristics included a median age of 79 years and a predominance of women with breast cancer. About one half of patients had an independent functional status. Nearly 15% presented severe undernourishment. Depression was suspected in 53.1% of cases. One third of these patients had >2 chronic diseases, and 74% of patients took > or =3 medications. Of the 93 patients with an initial treatment decision, the treatment plan was modified for 38.7% of cases after this assessment. Only body mass index and the absence of depressive symptoms were associated with a modification of the treatment plan. CONCLUSION: The geriatric oncology consultation led to a modification of the cancer treatment plan in more than one third of cases. Further studies are needed to determine whether these modifications improve the outcome of these older patients.

Tolerability of an equimolar mix of nitrous oxide and oxygen during painful procedures in very elderly patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although an equimolar mix of nitrous oxide-oxygen (N(2)O/O(2)) [Kalinox] is widely used as an analgesic, there have been few specific studies of this product in the elderly. In this article, we investigate the tolerability of this equimolar mix in very elderly patients undergoing painful procedures. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study of patients hospitalised in the geriatric short-stay unit of a teaching hospital between July 2001 and September 2003. All patients aged >/=80 years who were scheduled for invasive care procedures were eligible for inclusion. Sixty-two patients were recruited and underwent a total of 68 procedures. The procedures were divided into four classes based on the degree of pain they were expected to cause and their duration. Patients received the equimolar N(2)O/O(2) mix (Kalinox) for 5 minutes before the beginning of the procedure and throughout its duration. The inhaled treatment was administered via a high-concentration mask. Assessments were carried out during the inhalation and over the 15 minute period following inhalation. The primary endpoint of the study was tolerability of the equimolar N(2)O/O(2) mix, and all adverse events were recorded. Secondary endpoints were the efficacy of the product (assessed on a verbal rating scale and/or the Doloplus scale), its ease of use and its acceptability to patients and staff. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (22.6%) each reported at least one adverse event: impaired hearing (n = 1), altered perception of the environment (n = 8), anxiety (n = 1), headache (n = 3) and drowsiness at the end of the procedure (n = 2). All these disorders subsided rapidly after treatment was completed. CONCLUSION: This study shows the favourable tolerability of the equimolar N(2)O/O(2) mix in very elderly subjects, which makes this product a valuable tool for the management of acute pain in this age group.

Initiation of warfarin therapy in elderly medical inpatients: a safe and accurate regimen.

PURPOSE: Elderly patients are at high risk of over-anticoagulation when treated with warfarin, especially during treatment induction. We developed a simple low-dose regimen for starting warfarin therapy in elderly inpatients. The daily maintenance dosage is predicted from the international normalized ratio (INR) measured the day after the third daily intake of a 4-mg dose. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to evaluate the accuracy and safety of this regimen. METHODS: We studied 106 elderly (age >or=70 years) inpatients (mean [+/- SD] age, 85 +/- 6 years; range, 71 to 97 years) who had a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0. Accuracy in predicting the daily maintenance dose from INR value on day 3 was evaluated. RESULTS: The predicted daily maintenance warfarin dose (3.1 +/- 1.6 mg/d) correlated closely with the actual maintenance dose (3.2 +/- 1.7 mg/d; R(2) = 0.84). The predicted dose was equal to the actual dose in 77 patients (73%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64% to 81%) and within 1 mg in 101 patients (95%; 95% CI: 91% to 99%). The mean time needed to achieve a therapeutic INR was 6.7 +/- 3.3 days (median, 6.0 days); the mean time needed to achieve the maintenance dose was 9.2 +/- 4.5 days (median, 7.0 days). None of the patients had an INR >4.0 during this period. One fatal bleeding event was recorded in a patient with an INR in the therapeutic range. CONCLUSION: Our warfarin induction regimen was simple, safe, and accurate in predicting the daily maintenance warfarin dose in elderly hospitalized patients.

Critically ill old and the oldest-old patients in intensive care: short- and long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine characteristics and outcome of the old, very old and oldest-old ICU patients DESIGN. This is a cohort study. SETTING: The study was set in a ten-bed medical ICU in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS. There were 410 patients classified in three subgroups: old, 75-79 years ( n=184; 44.4%), very old, 80-84 ( n=137, 33.4%) and the oldest-old, >or=85 ( n=91; 22.2%). MEASUREMENTS: Underlying medical conditions, organ dysfunction, severity of illness, length of stay, use of mechanical ventilation, therapeutic activity and nosocomial infections were recorded. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for ICU and long-term mortality. RESULTS: Characteristics at ICU admission did not differ among the three groups. ICU length of stay, therapeutic activity, mechanical ventilation and nosocomial infection(s) decreased with age. ICU survival rates for those below 75, 75-79, 80-84 and over 85 years were 80, 68, 75 and 69%, respectively; survival rates at 3 months were 54, 56 and 51%, respectively. APACHE II score [odds ratio (OR): 1.11] was identified as the only factor associated with ICU mortality, and age (OR: 2.17, for patients >or=85 years old and 1.82, for patients 80-84 years old) and limitation of activity before admission (OR: 1.74) as factors associated with long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: In a population of patients >or=75 years old, very old age is not directly associated with ICU mortality. After ICU discharge, deaths occurred predominantly during the first 3 months: age and prior limitation of activity were associated with the risk of dying.