Improving Anticoagulation Care for Pediatric Oncology Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Background: Cancer is associated with increased venous thromboembolism in children. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in this cohort include using central venous catheters, mass effect from underlying malignancy, chemotherapy, and surgery. Anticoagulation management in this cohort is challenging, given recurrent episodes of thrombocytopenia, the need for invasive procedures, and coagulopathy. A quality improvement (QI) initiative was developed to improve hematology consultation services and provide documentation of an individualized anticoagulation care plan for this high-risk cohort. Methods: Through the use of QI methods, interviews of stakeholders, expert consensus, and review of baseline data, a multidisciplinary team was organized, and key drivers relevant to improving access to hematology consultations and documentation of individualized anticoagulation care plans were identified. We used a Plan-Do-Study-Act model to improve hematology consultations and documentation of anticoagulation care plan (process measure). Outcome measures were bleeding and thrombosis recurrence/progression. Results: Seventeen patients with oncologic and venous thromboembolism diagnoses were included as baseline data. Slightly over half of these patients [53% (n = 9)] had a hematology consultation, and 7 (43.8%) had documentation of an anticoagulation care plan. After implementing QI methods, all 34 patients (100%) received hematology consultations and documentation of an anticoagulation care plan, and this measure was sustained for 1 year. Bleeding and thrombosis rates were similar in the baseline and post-QI cohorts. Conclusions: QI interventions proved effective in sustaining access to hematology consultations and providing anticoagulation care plans for patients with concomitant improved anticoagulation plan documentation for patients.

A regional anticoagulation program improves safety and outcomes for both children and adults.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based anticoagulation programs usually serve a local, adult patient population. Here we report outcomes for a regional combined pediatric-adult program. AIMS: The aims of this study were: (1) Compare the pre- vs. post-implementation quality of therapy (% time in therapeutic range (%TTR) and compliance). (2) Assess anticoagulant-relevant outcomes (bleeding and thrombotic complications). METHODS: Data were collected for the years 2014-2019. Rosendaal linear interpolation was used to calculate %TTR. Bleeding complications were categorized using ISTH-SSC standard nomenclature and new thrombotic events were reviewed. RESULTS: The patients were divided into a long-term warfarin group (N = 308), 80.2% of whom had cardiac-related therapeutic indications (median age 24y), and a second group (N = 114) comprised of short-term and non-warfarin long-term anticoagulation (median age 16y). Median %TTR for those on long-term warfarin was 78.9%. The incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events was 1.65 and 2.43 /100 person-years of warfarin use, respectively. Thromboembolism (TE) incidence was 0.78/100 patient-years of warfarin use. Neither bleeding nor thrombosis was associated with %TTR (p = 0.48). Anticoagulant indication was the only variable associated with bleeding risk (p = 0.005). The second group had no on-therapy TE events but 7.9% experienced bleeding. Complete data were available for a randomly sampled pre-program warfarin group (N = 26). Median %TTR improved from 17.5 to 87% pre- vs. post-implementation. Similarly, compliance (defined as ≥ 1 INR/month) improved by 34.3%. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this program significantly improved and sustained %TTR and compliance. The lack of association between bleeding and thrombosis events and %TTR may be related to the high median %TTR (> 70%) achieved by this approach.

Drive-Through Anticoagulation Clinic During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

An innovative approach to anticoagulation management during the COVID-19 pandemic was used at our center that allowed patients to stay in their vehicle while our anticoagulation advanced practice registered nurse obtained blood for point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) testing while education and counseling were completed. A significant improvement in the median percentage of INR within the therapeutic range was observed among the patients who used the drive-through clinic. A small group of patients improved compliance to anticoagulation monitoring. Clinical care models, such as this clinic approach may improve patient compliance and adherence to anticoagulation beyond the pandemic needs.

Thrombosis Prevention and Anticoagulation Management in the Pediatric Patient with Congenital Heart Disease.

Thrombosis is one of the most frequent complications affecting children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Palliative and reparative cardiac surgeries are some of the main players contributing to the thrombosis risk in this patient population. Additional risk factors related to the CHD itself (e.g., cardiac dysfunction, arrhythmias, and polycythemia in cyanotic cardiac disorders) can contribute to thrombogenicity alone or combined with other factors. Thrombotic complications have been recognized as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Here, we provide an overview of the pathophysiology and risk factors for thrombosis as well as the indications for and use of different anticoagulation, antiplatelet, and thrombolytic agents. In addition, we describe some of most common thrombotic complications and their management in the pediatric CHD population.

Treatment-Related Outcomes in Paget-Schroetter Syndrome-A Cross-Sectional Investigation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate treatment-related outcomes, namely radiological clot resolution, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and health related quality-of-life (HRQoL) scores, in children with Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS) undergoing multidisciplinary management, including anticoagulation and decompressive rib-resection surgery, with or without thrombolytic therapy. STUDY DESIGN: We identified all patients treated for PSS at our institution between the years 2010 and 2017. Baseline clinical and radiologic data were abstracted from medical records. Two validated survey instruments to quantify PTS and HRQoL were mailed to eligible patients. Standard statistical methods were used to summarize these measures. RESULTS: In total, 22 eligible patients were identified; 10 were treated with thrombolysis followed by anticoagulation and rib resection, and 12 were treated with anticoagulation and rib resection alone. Nineteen patients responded to the survey instruments. Median age at deep vein thrombosis diagnosis and survey completion were 16.3 and 20.4 years, respectively. Nineteen of 22 patients had thrombus resolution on radiologic follow-up. Fourteen of 19 survey respondents reported signs/symptoms of PTS of which the majority (12/14) reported mild PTS. Aggregate total, physical, and psychosocial HRQoL scores reported were 90.6, 96.7, and 93.3, respectively. Thrombolytic therapy was not associated with a significant improvement in radiologic, clinical or HRQoL outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with PSS had complete thrombus resolution on imaging. Only 11% of survey respondents reported moderate PTS. The entire cohort reported excellent HRQoL scores. The role for thrombolytic therapy in the management of childhood PSS remains incompletely elucidated.