Identifying social outcomes of importance for childhood cancer survivors: an e-Delphi study.

PURPOSE: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at risk of deficits in their social outcomes, a key aspect of overall health and quality of life. Social outcomes of import are ill-defined leading to potential gaps in research and service provision. In this study, we undertook a preliminary consensus seeking exercise to support the development of a framework of the important social outcomes for CCS. METHODS: A modified e-Delphi study was conducted with four groups: CCS, health professionals, social workers and teachers. Round 1, developed from a literature review, included 34 questions rated for importance on a 7-point Likert scale. Rounds 2 and 3 presented items not achieving consensus, additionally proposed items and in round 3, a ranking question. RESULTS: Survey 1 was completed by 38 participants, 31 (82%) completed survey 2 and 28 (76%) completed survey 3. A total of 36 items were prioritised across 6 domains (education, independence, work, relationships, community, lifestyle), together forming the final list of social outcomes. Of these, 22 items met consensus for importance. Items rated most important were "having autonomy" and "avoiding social isolation". Quantitative and qualitative results reflected that social outcomes for survivors and general public should be the same. CONCLUSION: We have generated initial consensus on important social outcomes for CCS, highlighting the need for these to be matched to those of the general population. It suggests strategies are required to ensure autonomy and appropriate support for independence and relationships are provided through long-term aftercare and beyond. Further work is needed to validate and develop these findings into a framework to support appropriate social aftercare for CCS.

Following treatment for childhood cancer, survivors may face problems with their social health. These are the parts of life, besides physical and mental health, that help people to lead full, happy and satisfied lives. Social health is important as it affects all areas of our lives and includes many areas such as education, work and relationships. It is essential that we understand what the most important areas of social health are for childhood cancer survivors so that we can support these. This will help survivors lead the lives they want as adults. In this study, 38 childhood cancer survivors, children's cancer doctors and nurses, social workers and teachers took part in a series of questionnaires designed to collect their views about social health for survivors. Participants established 22 areas of social health to be very important. 'Having autonomy' and 'avoiding social isolation' were selected as the most important. Participants felt that the aspects of social health which are important to survivors are the same outcomes as for the wider public. However, survivors may face many barriers to doing well in these areas. To fully identify the important areas of social health for childhood cancer survivors, we need to undertake further work to understand the views of other important groups, such as parents or carers. We also need to explore the barriers survivors face in achieving good social health.

Socio-economic and ethnic disparities in childhood cancer survival, Yorkshire, UK.

BACKGROUND: Establishing the existence of health inequalities remains a high research and policy agenda item in the United Kingdom. We describe ethnic and socio-economic differences in paediatric cancer survival, focusing specifically on the extent to which disparities have changed over a 20-year period. METHODS: Cancer registration data for 2674 children (0-14 years) in Yorkshire were analysed. Five-year survival estimates by ethnic group (south Asian/non-south Asian) and Townsend deprivation fifths (I-V) were compared over time (1997-2016) for leukaemia, lymphoma, central nervous system (CNS) and other solid tumours. Hazard ratios (HR: 95% CI) from adjusted Cox models quantified the joint effect of ethnicity and deprivation on mortality risk over time, framed through causal interpretation of the deprivation coefficient. RESULTS: Increasing deprivation was associated with significantly higher risk of death for children with leukaemia (1.11 (1.03-1.20)) and all cancers between 1997 and 2001. While we observed a trend towards reducing differences in survival over time in this group, a contrasting trend was observed for CNS tumours whereby sizeable variation in outcome remained for cases diagnosed until 2012. South Asian children with lymphoma had a 15% reduced chance of surviving at least 5 years compared to non-south Asian, across the study period. DISCUSSION: Even in the United Kingdom, with a universally accessible healthcare system, socio-economic and ethnic disparities in childhood cancer survival exist. Findings should inform where resources should be directed to provide all children with an equitable survival outcome following a cancer diagnosis.

Systematic review of the use of translated patient-reported outcome measures in cancer trials.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used in clinical trials to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of interventions. Inclusion of participants from different ethnic backgrounds is essential for generalisability of cancer trial results. PRO data collection should include appropriately translated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to minimise missing data and sample attrition. METHODS: Protocols and/or publications from cancer clinical trials using a PRO endpoint and registered on the National Institute for Health Research Portfolio were systematically reviewed for information on recruitment, inclusion of ethnicity data, and use of appropriately translated PROMs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders to explore barriers and facilitators for optimal PRO trial design, diverse recruitment and reporting, and use of appropriately translated PROMs. RESULTS: Eighty-four trials met the inclusion criteria, only 14 (17%) (n = 4754) reported ethnic group data, and ethnic group recruitment was low, 611 (13%). Although 8 (57%) studies were multi-centred and multi-national, none reported using translated PROMs, although available for 7 (88%) of the studies. Interviews with 44 international stakeholders identified a number of perceived barriers to ethnically diverse recruitment including diverse participant engagement, relevance of ethnicity to research question, prominence of PROs, and need to minimise investigator burden. Stakeholders had differing opinions on the use of translated PROMs, the impact of trial designs, and recruitment strategies on diverse recruitment. Facilitators of inclusive research were described and examples of good practice identified. CONCLUSIONS: Greater transparency is required when PROs are used as primary or secondary outcomes in clinical trials. Protocols and publications should demonstrate that recruitment was accessible to diverse populations and facilitated by trial design, recruitment strategies, and appropriate PROM usage. The use of translated PROMs should be made explicit when used in cancer clinical trials.

Systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the efficacy and safety of probiotics in people with cancer.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Probiotics are living microorganisms that confer a health benefit on the host when administered. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of probiotics in adult and paediatric patients diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken (PROSPERO registration: CRD42016050252). Randomised controlled trials (RCT), identified through screening multiple databases were included for analysis of efficacy. Non-randomised controlled trials and case reports were included for safety analysis. Outcomes included the reduction in the incidence and severity of diarrhoea, and adverse events. Where possible, data were combined for meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Planned subgroup analyses were not possible through marked heterogeneity of study characteristics. RESULTS: Twenty one studies (N = 2982 participants) were included for assessment of efficacy. Probiotics may reduce the incidence of diarrhoea in patients with cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.78, 95% prediction interval (PI) 0.3-0.92, I-sq 36.9%, 5 studies] and the duration of pyrexia [standardised mean difference 0.39 days, 95% CI 0.35-0.43, I-sq 0.01%, 5 studies]. Twenty five studies (N = 2242) were included in the safety analysis. Five case reports showed probiotic-related bacteraemia/fungaemia/positive blood cultures. Definitions and reporting of adverse events were variable and inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: There remain insufficient studies to assess the true effect of probiotics in people with cancer. Meta-analysis suggests probiotics may be beneficial but further studies are still required. Improved reporting of outcomes and adverse events in clinical trials are required to improve accuracy and confidence of conclusions drawn in future updates.

Male and female experiences of having fertility matters raised alongside a cancer diagnosis during the teenage and young adult years.

Discussion and management of potential reproductive health sequelae of adolescent cancer are essential and challenging components of care for the multidisciplinary team. Despite this, research has been limited to specific experiences (e.g. sperm banking) or fertility-related concerns of adult survivors. This grounded theory study of 38 male and female survivors of adolescent cancer aged 16-30 years drew on in-depth single interviews to map the range of experiences of being advised that treatment might affect fertility. Strong support for being told at around diagnosis was found regardless of gender, age, incapacity or availability of fertility preservation services. Age and life stage appeared less significant for impact than the perceived level of threat to personal and social well-being. Women were more likely to achieve lower levels of comprehension about the physiological impact, to report later distress from lack of fertility preservation services and to revisit more frequently those decisions made by the few offered fertility preservation. Men found decision making about sperm banking straightforward on the whole and reported satisfaction with having the choice regardless of outcome. Findings suggest that young people can cope with this information alongside diagnosis especially when professional and parental support is proportionate to the particular impact on them.

Diagnosing childhood cancer in primary care--a realistic expectation?

The burden of childhood cancer for Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) is unknown. PCTs in Yorkshire are representative of England and Wales and show little heterogeneity in the incidence rates of childhood cancer. Each PCT will expect three to five newly diagnosed children per year. A single GP is likely to see an incident case once every 20 years.

Geographic mobility following cancer treatment in Yorkshire, UK.

Long term cure and maximising reintegration into society are major goals of childhood cancer treatment. Whether reintegration had occurred was assessed using geographic mobility as an objective proxy. Age, sex, and socioeconomic status were identified as being independently associated with mobility whereas diagnosis and relapse were not.

Hospital attendance patterns in long term survivors of cancer.

AIMS: To identify attendance patterns in a childhood cancer long term follow up clinic, in order to inform decision making strategies for efficient, cost effective local and national surveillance of survivors. METHODS: Cross-sectional review of 385 individuals >5 years from completion of cancer therapy in childhood or adolescence, attending a regional paediatric oncology and haematology centre. RESULTS: Attenders were younger than non-attenders in the <18 age group; no differences were found for > or =18 year age group. Those attending clinic were more recently off treatment; no significant difference existed for those <7 years from completion of therapy. A greater proportion of attenders were in the most affluent socioeconomic groups with a greater proportion of non-attenders in the lower groups. Those in full time education or training were more likely to attend and those unemployed were less likely. Multiple regression analysis confirmed a significant trend in reduction in attendance with increasing social deprivation, and that attenders were more than twice as likely to be in full time education or training. CONCLUSIONS: Following cancer treatment in childhood and adolescence, attendance at long term follow up programmes is determined by social factors including education, employment, and deprivation.

Epidemiology of central nervous system tumors in children and young adults (0-29 years), Yorkshire, United Kingdom.

The authors describe the incidence and survival of 480 patients diagnosed under 30 years with a CNS tumor in Yorkshire, UK, between 1990 and 2001. The effect on survival from deprivation and other prognostic factors was examined. Young adults (aged 15-29) were significantly less likely to develop CNS tumors than children (p = .001), largely because of an excess of medulloblastoma and ependymoma in the pediatric age range. No significant temporal trends in incidence were present apart from young adults with "other CNS" tumors showing an average annual increase of 10.7% (95% CI 1.3-21.0%; p = .03). Young adults had significantly lower survival rates than children (hazard ratio = 1.52, 95% CI 1.10-2.10). The highest risk of death was observed for patients from the most affluent areas. The overall burden of CNS tumors appears to be relatively constant, but the significantly poorer survival for young people needs further rapid investigation.

Patterns of childhood cancer by ethnic group in Bradford, UK 1974-1997.

The highly urbanised northern English city of Bradford contains a diverse population from different ethnic backgrounds, including a high proportion of south Asians. We aimed to identify the effect of ethnic group on the incidence and temporal trends of childhood cancer in Bradford. Children (0-14 years) from the district of Bradford, who were diagnosed with a malignancy between 1974 and 1997, were selected from a population-based register. Each child was classified as south Asian (Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi), or not, based on their full name using 2 computer algorithms and individual inspection. Mid-year population estimates were used to calculate incidence rates and differences were assessed using Poisson regression. The study included 318 children, of whom 81 (25%) were south Asian. The incidence of all cancers in south Asian children (14.9 per 100,000 person years, 95% CI 11.6-18.2) was higher than non-south Asian children (12.0, 10.5-13.5) although not significantly so (P=0.14). Comparisons by diagnostic subgroup showed no major differences apart from significantly higher rates of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in south Asian children (1.9 versus 0.7, P=0.02). The age-specific incidence peaks of all childhood cancers and leukaemias were present in south Asian children aged 5-9 years compared with 0-4 years olds in the non-south Asian population. Non-significant increases of 1.4 and 1.5% in the average annual incidence of all cancers were seen for south Asians and non-south Asians respectively, with a significant rise for non-south Asians with leukaemia of 3.0% (P=0.04). Our timely study shows patterns of occurrence of childhood cancer that differ with respect to ethnic group. Differences are particularly apparent in the excess of AML and incidence peak in 5-9 year olds in south Asian children.

Applicability of the Health Utilities Index to a population of childhood survivors of central nervous system tumours in the U.K.

This paper describes the application of a multi-attribute, preference-linked health status and health-related quality of life measurement system--the Health Utilities Index (developed in Canada)--to a group of subjects in the U.K. Children who had survived tumours of the central nervous system (n = 30, age 6-16 years) formed the study group. Respondents (children, parents, physicians and physiotherapists) found the activity (completion of a 15-item questionnaire) to be acceptable and not burdensome (it was accomplished easily by all children > or = 10 years of age). Instrumental reliability was established by acceptable intra- and interobserver agreement and construct validity was supported by strong similarities between the results obtained in this study and those reported from a similar group of children in Canada. The greatest burden of morbidity was reported for the attributes of emotion and cognition (each affected in > 50% of the children). Pain was surprisingly prevalent (affected in approximately one-third of children). The finding of a large number of unique health states emphasises the complex morbidity burden experienced by these children who self-reported poorer overall health (as reflected in utility scores) than did the proxy respondents. The information obtained from this study is readily interpretable and clinically useful. The results of this study also illustrate that extreme caution must be exercised in undertaking linguistic modifications to established instruments for, in this instance, these resulted in a loss of the ability to detect the most severe emotional morbidity and reduced the comparability of results between studies. With this provision, the Health Utilities Index is evidently applicable in the U.K. and the original version has been recommended for use in brain tumour studies by the U.K. CCSG (the U.K. Children's Cancer Study Group).

School behaviour and health status after central nervous system tumours in childhood.

This study was designed to assess the overall morbidity burden of survival from central nervous system (CNS) tumours and its impact on return to a normal lifestyle. School behaviour and health status of 27 children after treatment for CNS tumours, of 25 of their school-aged siblings, plus age- and sex-matched controls is reported. Spinetta school behaviour, Lansky play-performance and Health Utilities Index (mark II and III) assessments have been made. Patients had reduced mobility and increased pain levels. They demonstrated a reluctance to participate in organized physical activities. Impaired cognition, emotion and self-esteem were reported. They worried more than controls but attended school willingly, interacted normally with their peers and viewed the future confidently. Their siblings were reluctant to express openly concern for others or feelings of joy. Teachers were reliable proxies for most attributes, notable exceptions being speech and emotion. This is the first study to have assessed the school behaviour of a cohort solely composed of survivors of childhood CNS tumours. The good social reintegration is reassuring and likely to reflect a high level of psychosocial support. However, the results presented identify these young people as a 'special educational needs' group as defined by the 1981 and 1993 Education Acts.

Influence of proxy respondents and mode of administration on health status assessment following central nervous system tumours in childhood.

Central nervous system (CNS) tumours account for 20% of childhood cancers. Survivors often experience severe physical, neuropsychological and social sequelae of the disease and its treatment. Health status assessment in these individuals is an essential clinical outcome measure, yet little consensus exists regarding the optimum methodology. The influence of proxy respondents (parents, physiotherapists and doctors) and mode of administration (home and clinic) in which assessments is performed has been evaluated in a cohort of 37 survivors of childhood CNS tumours. A health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire, incorporating the Mark II and III Health Utilities Indices, was completed at home and in clinic by patients and parents. Doctors and physiotherapists completed this questionnaire plus Lansky Play-Performance and Karnofsky Performance scores. No significant differences between raters for single attribute scores occurred either at home or in clinic, although a wide range of agreement (kappa = 0.05-1.00, percentage agreement 53-100%) between observers was revealed. Most agreement occurred between parents and patients: this was greatest on home completion (kappa = 0.48-1.00, percentage agreement 53-100%). Doctors and physiotherapists agreed less on subjective attributes (emotion, cognition and pain). Better if responses were classified as normal and abnormal. Inter-observer agreement was greater for the HRQOL questionnaire than for Karnofsky and Lansky scores. Home completion of questionnaires provides a reliable, acceptable and convenient method of assessing health status.