Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 8267-8274, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34445918

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Optimal post-cesarean pain control is important. With the rising opioid epidemic it is imperative to maximize non-opioid based primary approaches to post-cesarean pain control. In 2018, we implemented a standardized post-cesarean analgesia regimen. OBJECTIVE: To determine if implementation of a standardized postoperative analgesic regimen decreases opioid use following cesarean birth. STUDY DESIGN: A standardized postoperative analgesia protocol was implemented in June 2018, which included scheduled oral acetaminophen (975 mg every 6 h) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (ketorolac 15 mg IV every 6 h for 5 doses followed by ibuprofen 600 mg oral every 6 h) with opioids available for breakthrough pain. There was no prior standardized protocol. A before-and-after study design was used to compare oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for nine months prior to and nine months after this protocol was implemented, excluding the two month period of protocol rollout. Women with opioid use disorder or postoperative intubation were excluded. The primary outcome was the cumulative MME used in the first 72 h postoperatively. Total dose at 12, 24, and 48 h were also compared. RESULTS: Of 2340 women who underwent cesarean birth during the study period (1 July 2017 - 30 April 2019), 2001 women met inclusion criteria (914 before 10 April 2018 (pre-protocol) and 1087 after 17 June 2018 (post-protocol)). Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar, including gestational age at delivery, maternal body mass index (BMI), planned versus unplanned cesarean birth, and type of intraoperative anesthesia used. The cumulative opioid dose in the first 72 h postoperatively was 216.3 ± 84.3 MME prior to implementation compared to 171.5 ± 91.5 MME following implementation (p < .001). The average cumulative MME use was higher in the pre-protocol period compared to post-protocol at all time periods: 12 h (57.3 ± 23.8 vs 48.6 ± 26.2 MME, p < .001), 24 h (98.1 ± 34.1 vs 82.1 ± 38.8 MME, p < .001), and 48 h (165.8 ± 58.3 vs 134.9 ± 66.2 MME, p < .001). The average pain scores were lower in the pre-protocol group (3 vs 3.3, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Scheduled administration of acetaminophen and NSAIDs following cesarean birth significantly decreased the cumulative dose of opioids used in the first 72 h postoperatively.


Assuntos
Analgesia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Acetaminofen , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Medição da Dor/métodos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides , Período Pós-Parto , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 3(1): 100281, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33451596

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity increases the risk of opioid-related morbidity. Lidocaine patches have been shown to reduce postoperative pain after noncesarean surgeries. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether the application of lidocaine patches around the cesarean incision in women with obesity reduces the total dose of opioids administered in the first 24 hours after cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a pilot single-blind randomized controlled trial of 61 women with obesity undergoing cesarean delivery at a community tertiary referral hospital staffed by academic physicians. After cesarean delivery, the allocated patches (either 5% lidocaine patches or placebo patches) were applied superior and lateral to the incision dressing and remained in place for 12 hours. The average cumulative opioid dose received within the first 24 hours after cesarean delivery was measured in morphine milligram equivalents. We also assessed pain and patient satisfaction. A sample size of 60 (30 per group) was determined to be adequate to inform a future appropriately powered randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome of morphine milligram equivalents was compared using the Student t test, and pain scores were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Of the 146 women screened between February 2019 and September 2019, 61 consented and were analyzed: 30 women were allocated to lidocaine patch and 31 were allocated to placebo (hydrocolloid patch). Women who were allocated to the lidocaine patch used an average of 87.0 (standard deviation, 35.8) morphine milligram equivalents of opioids in the first 24 hours compared with an average of 83.9 (standard deviation, 27.5) morphine milligram equivalents among women who were allocated to the placebo patch (P=.702). Women who were allocated to the lidocaine vs placebo patches reported median pain scores of 3.0 (interquartile range, 2.1-4.9) and 3.5 (interquartile range, 2.5-5.0), respectively (P=.217). The time to the first dose of opioids, total number of opioid doses, and total morphine milligram equivalents in 48 hours and for the entire hospital stay did not differ. Patient satisfaction with both patches was high and not statistically different. CONCLUSION: This pilot suggests that 5% lidocaine patches applied superior and lateral to the cesarean incision are not effective at reducing the average total dose of morphine milligram equivalents administered in the first 24 hours after cesarean delivery among women with obesity, and they did not seem to improve median pain scores. An appropriately powered randomized trial would not be expected to demonstrate reduction in opioid use or pain.


Assuntos
Lidocaína , Dor Pós-Operatória , Feminino , Humanos , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/complicações , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos Piloto , Gravidez , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA