Are EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors effective in elderly patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer?

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib changed dramatically the history of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring EGFR mutations. However, not enough data are available on the efficacy of these targeted drugs in elderly patients. The aim of this study is to analyse the available clinical data evaluating the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapies in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutations. A literature-based meta-analysis of the results of randomized clinical trials was undertaken. Relevant publications from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and abstracts from American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings were searched. Progression-free survival (PFS), as a measure of the efficacy of treatment, was the primary outcome investigated. The pooled analysis revealed an overall significant improvement in PFS (HR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69; p = 0.0004) with the use of EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The data stratification per age subgroups showed that EGFR TKIs were more effective in prolonging PFS in elderly patients, with HR 0.39 (p = 0.008), in comparison with young patients (HR = 0.48; p = 0.04). The results of this study suggest that EGFR TKIs have a significant effect in slowing down diseases progression in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, therefore representing a valid therapeutic option in this age group.

CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Notwithstanding the continuous progress made in cancer treatment in the last 20 years, and the availability of new targeted therapies, metastatic Breast Cancer (BC) is still incurable. Targeting the cell cycle machinery has emerged as an attractive strategy to tackle cancer progression, showing very promising results in the preclinical and clinical settings. The first selective inhibitors of CDK4/6 received breakthrough status and FDA approval in combination with letrozole (February 2015) and fulvestrant (February 2016) as first-line therapy in ER-positive advanced and metastatic BC. Considering the success of this family of compounds in hormone-positive BC, new possible applications are being investigated in other molecular subtypes. This review summarizes the latest findings on the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2 positive BC.

Low-Dose Oral Ethinylestradiol With Concomitant Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid for Advanced Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of low-dose oral ethinylestradiol (EE) and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue with concomitant low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) as a thromboprophylactic agent for advanced castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients received an EE dose of 150 µg daily (50 µg 3 times daily) and an ASA dose of 100 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the prostate-specific antigen response. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were enrolled. A PSA response was observed in 19 patients (59.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-76%). The median progression-free survival was 9.4 months (95% CI, 6.5-14.1 months). The treatment was generally well tolerated and no grade 3-4 toxicity was observed. Only 1 patient interrupted EE because of a cardiac event and 1 patient experienced grade 2 nausea and vomiting. No major bleeding occurred. CONCLUSION: Low-dose EE with concomitant low-dose ASA is safe, showing potential activity in patients with advanced CRPC, and should be investigated further.

Is still there a role for IL-2 for solid tumors other than melanoma or renal cancer?

AIM: IL-2 is one of the first immunomodulating cytokines to be tested in the treatment of cancer patients. The effects of this agent in the treatment of solid tumors other than renal cancer and melanoma are poorly understood. MATERIALS & METHODS: We have carried out a meta-analysis of randomized studies. We fixed the response rate as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The pooled risk ratio for an objective response with IL-2 plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.12-1.81; p = 0.004), in favor of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Further investigation in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer or other solid malignancies with IL-2 is required, alone or in combination with chemotherapy.

New molecular therapies in patients with advanced Hepatocellular Cancer in second line of treatment: Is a real defeat?: Results from a literature based meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Several new biological agents have been investigated as second line of treatment in advanced Hepatocellular Cancer (HCC). We performed a meta-analysis to assess the effect of targeted therapies in advanced HCC patients beyond the first line of treatment. A literature-based metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials was undertaken. The primary outcome was the overall survival. The secondary endpoints were the progression-free survival (PFS), the response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) and the safety. Pooled analysis of targeted agents revealed a modest increase in overall survival compared with control arm (Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.93, 95%CI: 0.83-1.04; P=0.21). On the counterpart, all the secondary endpoints were in favoured to the targeted agents-based treatment (PFS: HR=0.68, 95% CI:0.56-0.83; P=0.0002; RR: 3.50,95% CI 1.81-6.76; P=0.0002, DCR: RR:1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.32; P=0.002). To date, there is a clinical need of a more efficacious second line of therapy in treatment of the advanced HCC. This study showed some activity of the new targeted therapies in second line of treatment in advanced HCC.

Targeting the androgenic pathway in elderly patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: The novel hormonal drugs have recently entered in the armamentarium of therapies for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). First reports are available for their use in elderly men with CRPC. METHOD: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has been performed. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) University Meeting were searched for data on the use of new hormonal treatment in elderly patients with CRPC. RESULTS: Nine studies for a total of 3512 elderly patients were available for meta-analysis. Six studies reported outcomes of patients aged >75 years old while 2 studies reported on patients aged >70 years old. The pooled analysis of the androgen synthesis inhibitors revealed significantly increased overall survival (OS) due to antiandrogen agents compared with placebo or placebo and prednisone (hazard ratio (HR) for death: HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.67-0.82; P < 0.00001). Moreover, the new antiandrogenic therapy significantly improved the progression-free survival (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31-0.65; P < 0.0001). The incidence of any grade ≥3 adverse effect was only moderately higher during with the antiandrogenic therapy as compared to the control arms (response rate = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.88-1.20; P = 0.72). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that agents targeting the androgen axis (i.e., enzalutamide, abiraterone) significantly prolonged OS in elderly men with CRPC.

Apatinib for the treatment of gastric cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Apatinib, a small-molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, has demonstrated encouraging anti-cancer activity in gastric cancer within both in vitro and in vivo models. AREAS COVERED: Apatinib's efficacy, tolerability and safety have been evaluated in one Phase II and one Phase III study in metastatic/advanced gastric cancer. In this review, we focus on the mechanism of action of apatinib, its pharmacokinetic profile and its clinical activity in the treatment of advanced/metastatic gastric cancer. Expert commentary: Unfortunately, as yet, there is no definitive biomarker data for apatinib in gastric cancer.

A Phase II study of olaparib in breast cancer patients: biological evaluation from a 'window of opportunity' trial.

The OLTRE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02681562) is an open-label, 'window of opportunity' Phase II controlled trial to evaluate the biological activity of olaparib in locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer compared with other subtypes of locally advanced breast cancer patients carrying germinal BRCA mutation receiving olaparib with the same treatment approach. The primary end point is to investigate the correlation between baseline gene and protein expression profile in order to identify possible predictive markers of response to olaparib. The OLTRE trial is expected to identify the surrogate markers of the biological activity of olaparib in the treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

No Advantage in Survival With Targeted Therapies as Maintenance in Patients With Limited and Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Literature-Based Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a lethal disease with a very restricted armamentarium of active treatments. In the new era of targeted therapies, several attempts based on the combination of chemotherapy with new compounds has been made but with a low rate of success. The idea of using the new targeted therapies as maintenance treatment after their combination with chemotherapy has been pursued. The aim of the present study was to analyze the available clinical data regarding the effect of the targeted agents as maintenance therapy on survival in patients with SCLC. A literature-based meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, in accordance with the preferences for reported items in systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, was performed. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and a search of abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings were searched for relevant studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Nine studies, with a total of 1385 patients, were included. The pooled analysis revealed that the new targeted therapies did not improve survival compared with the control arm (placebo, hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.15; P = .69). However, a small advantage in the 1-year OS rate (risk ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.63; P = .21) was observed. Maintenance with targeted therapies failed to improve the survival of patients with SCLC with an increased rate of toxicity. The detected survival advantage suggests that perhaps the maintenance approach could be used to increase the 1-year OS rate. However, this finding requires confirmation in further studies, perhaps of patients selected according to their tumor biologic profile.

A Phase Ib Open-Label Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Everolimus in Combination With Eribulin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancers.

BACKGROUND: The VERITAS (A Phase 1B open-label study to assess the safety and tolerability of everolimus in combination with eribulin in triple-negative breast cancers) trial (EudraCT number: 2014-000135-17) is a phase Ib, open label, multicenter, dose-escalation, safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study based on the combination of everolimus with eribulin in sequential cohorts of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The primary objective of the study is to identify the recommended dose of everolimus in combination with eribulin. Secondary endpoints include the assessment of pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of the experimental treatment. The sample size is based on the Bayesisan approach with regards to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) observed. An average sample size of approximately 12 patients is deemed reasonable based on simulations. CONCLUSION: The VERITAS trial is expected to determine the recommended dose of everolimus in combination with eribulin in TBNC. This study may open the way for further analysis of this combination in phase II studies in this orphan disease of active drug combination such as the TNBC subset.

Breast cancer circulating biomarkers: advantages, drawbacks, and new insights.

As of today, the level of individualization of cancer therapies has reached a level that 20 years ago would be considered visionary. However, most of the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapy-predictive procedures which aim to improve the overall level of personalization are based on the evaluation of tumor tissue samples, therefore requiring surgical operations with consequent low compliance for patients and high costs for the hospital. Hence, the research of a panel of circulating indicators which may serve as source of information about tumor characteristics and which may be obtainable by a simple withdrawal of peripheral blood today represents a growing field of interest. This review aims to objectively summarize the characteristics of the currently available breast cancer circulating biomarkers, also providing an overview about the multitude of novel potential soluble predictors which are still under evaluation. Specifically, the usefulness of a so-called "liquid biopsy" will be discussed in terms of improvements of diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy-prediction, but an overview will be given also on the potentiality of the molecular characterization arising from the isolation of circulating biomarkers and cells. Although this review will focus on the specific case of the breast, in the future liquid biopsies will hopefully be available for virtually any type of neoplasms.

Immune-related strategies driving immunotherapy in breast cancer treatment: a real clinical opportunity.

Because its original use as a treatment for hematologic disease, more recently immunotherapy has emerged as a novel effective therapeutic strategy for solid malignancies, such as melanoma and prostate carcinoma. For breast carcinoma, an immunologic therapeutic approach has not been well evaluated, even though there is evidence to suggest it would be a successful novel strategy, especially taking into account the high mortality rate of the most aggressive variants of this heterogeneous disease. Here, we briefly describe the most recently awarded immune-based therapies with a consolidated or potential implication for the treatment of solid malignancies. We focus on immune checkpoints and on the clinical potential of their abrogation, with a further overview of novel vaccine-based approaches and the most relevant immunotherapeutic techniques. We aim to provide an exhaustive review of the most promising immune-therapeutic agents that may have implications for breast cancer treatment.